html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753587963,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,753587963,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzU4Nzk2Mw==,154364,dracos,2021-01-03T09:02:50Z,2021-01-03T10:00:05Z,NONE,"> but I'm already commited to requiring support for () => {} arrow functions

Don't think you are :) (e.g. gzipped, using arrow functions in my example saves 2 bytes over spelling out function). On FMS, past month, looking at popular browsers, looks like we'd have 95.41% arrow support, 94.19% module support, and 4.58% (mostly IE9/IE11/Safari 9) supporting neither.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429,JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752882797,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,752882797,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjg4Mjc5Nw==,154364,dracos,2020-12-31T08:07:59Z,2020-12-31T15:04:32Z,NONE,"If you're using arrow functions, you can presumably use default parameters, not much difference in support. That would save you 9 bytes. But OTOH you need `""use strict"";` to use arrow functions etc, and that's 13 bytes.

Your latest 250-byte one, with use strict, gzips to 199 bytes. The following might be 292 bytes, but compresses to 204, basically the same, and works in any browser (well, IE9+) at all:

`var datasette=datasette||{};datasette.plugins=function(){var d={};return{register:function(b,c,e){d[b]||(d[b]=[]);d[b].push([c,e])},call:function(b,c){c=c||{};var e=[];(d[b]||[]).forEach(function(a){a=a[0].apply(a[0],a[1].map(function(a){return c[a]}));void 0!==a&&e.push(a)});return e}}}();`

Source for that is below; I replaced the [fn,parameters] because closure-compiler includes a polyfill for that, and I ran `closure-compiler --language_out ECMASCRIPT3`:

```js
var datasette = datasette || {};
datasette.plugins = (() => {
    var registry = {};
    return {
        register: (hook, fn, parameters) => {
            if (!registry[hook]) {
                registry[hook] = [];
            }
            registry[hook].push([fn, parameters]);
        },
        call: (hook, args) => {
            args = args || {};
            var results = [];
            (registry[hook] || []).forEach((data) => {
                /* Call with the correct arguments */
                var result = data[0].apply(data[0], data[1].map(parameter => args[parameter]));
                if (result !== undefined) {
                    results.push(result);
                }
            });
            return results;
        }
    };
})();
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429,JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752888552,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,752888552,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjg4ODU1Mg==,154364,dracos,2020-12-31T08:33:11Z,2020-12-31T08:34:27Z,NONE,"If you could say that all hook functions had to accept one options parameter (and could use object destructuring if they wished to only see a subset), you could have this, which minifies (to all-browser-JS) to 200 bytes, gzips to 146, and works practically the same:

```js
var datasette = datasette || {};
datasette.plugins = (() => {
    var registry = {};
    return {
        register: (hook, fn) => {
            registry[hook] = registry[hook] || [];
            registry[hook].push(fn);
        },
        call: (hook, args) => {
            var results = (registry[hook] || []).map(fn => fn(args||{}));
            return results;
        }
    };
})();
```

`var datasette=datasette||{};datasette.plugins=function(){var b={};return{register:function(a,c){b[a]=b[a]||[];b[a].push(c)},call:function(a,c){return(b[a]||[]).map(function(a){return a(c||{})})}}}();`

Called the same, definitions tiny bit different:

```js
datasette.plugins.register('numbers', ({a, b}) => a + b)
datasette.plugins.register('numbers', o => o.a * o.b)
datasette.plugins.call('numbers', {a: 4, b: 6})
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429,JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy,