{"id": 1795187493, "node_id": "I_kwDODLZ_YM5rAGMl", "number": 12, "title": "Switch to pyproject.toml", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2023-07-09T01:06:56Z", "updated_at": "2023-07-09T01:19:43Z", "closed_at": "2023-07-09T01:19:42Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "First of my CLI tools to use https://til.simonwillison.net/python/pyproject", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/12/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1246826792, "node_id": "I_kwDODLZ_YM5KUREo", "number": 10, "title": "When running `auth` command, don't overwrite an existing auth.json file", "user": {"value": 11887, "label": "ashanan"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-05-24T16:42:20Z", "updated_at": "2022-09-07T15:07:38Z", "closed_at": "2022-08-22T16:17:19Z", "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "Ran the `auth` command in the same directory I'd previously set up an auth.json file for `twitter-to-sqlite` and it was completely overwritten. Not the biggest issue, but still unexpected. Ideally, for me, the keys would just be added to the existing file, but getting a warning and a chance to back out would be a good solution as well.", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/10/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1345452427, "node_id": "I_kwDODLZ_YM5QMfmL", "number": 11, "title": "-a option is used for \"--auth\" and for \"--all\"", "user": {"value": 2467, "label": "fernand0"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-08-21T10:50:48Z", "updated_at": "2022-08-21T21:11:57Z", "closed_at": "2022-08-21T21:11:57Z", "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "I'm not sure which option is best, instead of -a -all.", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/11/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 750141615, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTI2ODQ3ODIz", "number": 7, "title": "Fixed conflicting CLI flags", "user": {"value": 8944, "label": "tlockney"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-11-24T23:25:12Z", "updated_at": "2022-08-21T21:11:56Z", "closed_at": "2022-08-21T21:11:56Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": "dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/pulls/7", "body": "The `-a` used for the auth credentials and the shortened form of the `--all` flags were in conflict on the `fetch` command. To be consistent with other `-to-sqlite` libraries in the Dogsheep ecosystem, I removed the shortened form of the `--all` flag.", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/7/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null} {"id": 503234169, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMyMzQxNjk=", "number": 2, "title": "Track and use the 'since' value", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2019-10-07T05:02:59Z", "updated_at": "2020-03-27T22:22:30Z", "closed_at": "2020-03-27T22:22:30Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Pocket says:\r\n\r\n> Whenever possible, you should use the since parameter, or count and and offset parameters when retrieving a user's list. After retrieving the list, you should store the current time (which is provided along with the list response) and pass that in the next request for the list. This way the server only needs to return a small set (changes since that time) instead of the user's entire list every time.\r\n\r\nAt the bottom of https://getpocket.com/developer/docs/v3/retrieve", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/2/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 503233021, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMyMzMwMjE=", "number": 1, "title": "Use better pagination (and implement progress bar)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2019-10-07T04:58:11Z", "updated_at": "2020-03-27T22:13:57Z", "closed_at": "2020-03-27T22:13:57Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Right now we attempt to load everything at once - which caps out at 5,000 items and is really slow.\r\n\r\nWe can do better by implementing pagination using count and offset.", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/1/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 589402939, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1ODk0MDI5Mzk=", "number": 4, "title": "Store authentication information as \"pocket_access_token\" etc", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-03-27T20:43:22Z", "updated_at": "2020-03-27T20:43:59Z", "closed_at": "2020-03-27T20:43:59Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The `pocket_` prefix will mean that the same `auth.json` file can be used for other Dogsheep tools without Pocket over-riding a value set by some other tool.", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/4/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}