id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1487738738,I_kwDOBm6k_c5YrRdy,1942,Option for plugins to request that JSON be served on the page,9599,open,0,,3268330,1,2022-12-10T01:08:53Z,2022-12-10T01:11:30Z,,OWNER,,"Idea came from a conversation with @hydrosquall - what if a Datasette plugin could say ""I'd like the JSON for a page to be included in a variable on the HTML page""? `datasette-cluster-map` already needs this - the first thing it does when the page loads is `fetch()` a JSON representation of that same data. This idea fits with my overall goals to unify the JSON and HTML context too. Refs: - #1711",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1942/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1486036269,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ykx0t,1941,Mechanism for supporting key rotation for DATASETTE_SECRET,9599,open,0,,,1,2022-12-09T05:24:53Z,2022-12-09T05:25:20Z,,OWNER,,"Currently if you change `DATASETTE_SECRET` all existing signed tokens - both cookies and API tokens and potentially other things too - will instantly expire. Adding support for key rotation would allow keys to be rotated on a semi-regular basis without logging everyone out / invalidating every API token instantly. Can model this on how Django does it: https://github.com/django/django/commit/0dcd549bbe36c060f536ec270d34d9e7d4b8e6c7",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1941/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1434094365,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Veosd,1881,Tool for simulating permission checks against actors,9599,closed,0,,,9,2022-11-03T04:43:20Z,2022-12-09T01:38:21Z,2022-11-04T00:13:05Z,OWNER,,"In working on this issue: - #1855 I realized that if I'm going to make actors more complicated (the proposed `_r` key for additional restricted permissions) I really need an interactive tool for simulating these checks, similar to the https://latest.datasette.io/-/allow-debug tool.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1881/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1483250004,I_kwDOBm6k_c5YaJlU,1936,Fix /db/table/-/upsert in the API explorer,9599,open,0,,3268330,2,2022-12-08T00:59:34Z,2022-12-08T01:36:02Z,,OWNER,,"Split from: - #1931 - #1878 This is a bit tricky because the code needs to figure out what the primary keys are for an item, and whether or not `rowid` should be included.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1936/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1432013704,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWsuI,1878,/db/table/-/upsert API,9599,closed,0,,8711695,8,2022-11-01T20:01:18Z,2022-12-08T01:12:18Z,2022-12-08T01:12:17Z,OWNER,,Equivalent to `sqlite-utils upsert`: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/python-api.html#upserting-data,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1878/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1473814539,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5EMVug,1931,/db/table/-/upsert,9599,closed,0,,8711695,8,2022-12-03T07:01:44Z,2022-12-08T01:12:17Z,2022-12-08T01:12:16Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1931,"Refs #1878 Still todo: - [x] Support `""return"": true` properly for upserts (with tests) - [x] Require both `insert-row` and `update-row` permissions - [x] Tests are going to need to cover both rowid-only and compound primary key tables, including all of the error states - [x] Documentation ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1931.org.readthedocs.build/en/1931/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1931/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1479920517,I_kwDOBm6k_c5YNcuF,1934,Return number of ignored/replaced items from /-/insert,9599,open,0,,3268330,0,2022-12-06T19:01:58Z,2022-12-06T19:02:03Z,,OWNER,,"Idea from here: - https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/516",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1934/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1473481262,I_kwDOBm6k_c5X04ou,1928,Hacker News Datasette write demo,9599,closed,0,,,7,2022-12-02T21:17:41Z,2022-12-02T23:47:11Z,2022-12-02T21:43:19Z,OWNER,,"Idea is to have my existing scraper at https://github.com/simonw/scrape-hacker-news-by-domain also write to my private Datasette Cloud account, then create an atom feed from it. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1928/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1175690070,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE5tW,1676,"Reconsider ensure_permissions() logic, can it be less confusing?",9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2022-03-21T17:14:57Z,2022-12-02T01:23:40Z,,OWNER,,"> Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/docs/internals.rst#await-ensure_permissionsactor-permissions > >> This method allows multiple permissions to be checked at onced. It raises a `datasette.Forbidden` exception if any of the checks are denied before one of them is explicitly granted. >> >> This is useful when you need to check multiple permissions at once. For example, an actor should be able to view a table if either one of the following checks returns `True` or not a single one of them returns `False`: > > That's pretty hard to understand! I'm going to open a separate issue to reconsider if this is a useful enough abstraction given how confusing it is. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1675#issuecomment-1074177827_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1676/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1471969984,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XvHrA,1926,Release notes for 1.0a1 (and release it),9599,closed,0,,7867486,1,2022-12-01T21:18:12Z,2022-12-01T22:06:13Z,2022-12-01T22:06:12Z,OWNER,,"Mainly CORS support and a few small bug fixes. Changes: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/1.0a0...99da46f7258225fc6fd8e94ddc20859ccccc4109",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1926/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1214859703,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IaUm3,1719,Refactor `RowView` and remove `RowTableShared`,9599,closed,0,,,3,2022-04-25T18:06:24Z,2022-12-01T21:15:19Z,2022-04-25T18:33:44Z,OWNER,,"> The `RowTableShared` class is making this a whole lot more complicated. > > I'm going to split the `RowView` view out into an entirely separate `views/row.py` module. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1715#issuecomment-1108875068_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1719/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1215174094,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IbhXO,1720,Design plugin hook for extras,9599,closed,0,,,14,2022-04-26T00:08:10Z,2022-12-01T21:15:19Z,2022-04-26T20:20:27Z,OWNER,,"Refs: - #262 - #1709 I realized that this is a really natural plugin hook - and if I design it as a hook I can implement Datasette's core extras as default plugins.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1720/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1212823665,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ISjhx,1715,Refactor TableView to use asyncinject,9599,closed,0,,,13,2022-04-22T21:43:39Z,2022-12-01T21:15:18Z,2022-04-28T22:26:56Z,OWNER,,"I've been working on a dependency injection mechanism in a separate library: - https://github.com/simonw/asyncinject I think it's ready to try out with Datasette to see if it's a pattern that will work here. I'm going to attempt to refactor `TableView` to use it. There are two overall goals here: - Use `asyncinject` to add parallel execution of some aspects of the table page - most notably I want to be able to execute the `count(*)` query, the `select ...` query, the various faceting queries and the facet suggestion queries in parallel - and measure if doing so is good for performance. - Use it to execute different output formats (possibly with some changes to the existing `register_output_renderer()` plugin hook). I want CSV and JSON to use the same mechanism that plugins use. Stretch goal is to get this working with streaming data too, see: - #1101",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1715/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1469973742,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XngTu,1922,Make sure CORS works for write APIs,9599,closed,0,,7867486,13,2022-11-30T17:15:55Z,2022-12-01T18:47:00Z,2022-12-01T18:47:00Z,OWNER,,"Split from: - #1850",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1922/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1470509936,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XpjNw,1924,Docs for replace:true and ignore:true options for insert API,9599,closed,0,,7867486,4,2022-12-01T01:33:25Z,2022-12-01T18:15:15Z,2022-12-01T02:08:02Z,OWNER,,Equivalent to https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#insert-replacing-data,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1924/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1470320227,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xo05j,1923,latest.datasette.io Cloud Run deploys failing,9599,closed,0,,,3,2022-11-30T22:49:34Z,2022-11-30T23:04:56Z,2022-11-30T23:04:56Z,OWNER,,"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3587402085/jobs/6038106719v ``` Warning: ""service_account_key"" has been deprecated. Please switch to using google-github-actions/auth which supports both Workload Identity Federation and Service Account Key JSON authentication. For more details, see https://github.com/google-github-actions/setup-gcloud#authorization Error: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud failed with: failed to execute command `gcloud --quiet auth activate-service-account *** --key-file -`: /opt/hostedtoolcache/gcloud/275.0.0/x64/lib/googlecloudsdk/core/console/console_io.py:544: SyntaxWarning: ""is"" with a literal. Did you mean ""==""? if answer is None or (answer is '' and default is not None): ERROR: gcloud failed to load: module 'collections' has no attribute 'MutableMapping' ```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1923/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1469044738,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj9gC,1918,API explorer should list mutable databases first,9599,closed,0,,7867486,1,2022-11-30T04:53:33Z,2022-11-30T05:22:07Z,2022-11-30T05:07:56Z,OWNER,,"https://latest.datasette.io/-/api hides `ephemeral` down at the bottom, would be more interesting if it was at the top. Related: - #1915 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1918/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1469062686,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XkB4e,1919,Intermittent `test_delete_row` test failure ,9599,open,0,,,1,2022-11-30T05:18:46Z,2022-11-30T05:20:56Z,,OWNER,,"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3580503393/jobs/6022689591 ``` delete_response = await ds_write.client.post( ""/data/{}/{}/-/delete"".format(table, delete_path), headers={ ""Authorization"": ""***"".format(write_token(ds_write)), }, ) > assert delete_response.status_code == 200 E assert 404 == 200 E + where 404 = .status_code /home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/tests/test_api_write.py:396: AssertionError =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED tests/test_api_write.py::test_delete_row[compound_pk_table-row_for_create2-pks2-article,k] - assert 404 == 200 + where 404 = .status_code ``` This passes most of the time, but very occasionally fails - in this case in Python 3.7 It seems to only fail for the `article,k` compound primary key test.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1919/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1469015001,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj2PZ,1916,GET requests against POST endpoints should not 500 error,9599,closed,0,,7867486,1,2022-11-30T04:04:43Z,2022-11-30T05:15:19Z,2022-11-30T05:15:19Z,OWNER,,"![CF37BA4D-0677-4DDD-A339-EAF163BB63B7](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/204705025-6f88e9f7-757d-45e8-a89c-ab97e84781e8.png) ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1916/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1469043836,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj9R8,1917,Don't allow writable API to edit the `_memory` database,9599,closed,0,,7867486,2,2022-11-30T04:51:59Z,2022-11-30T05:07:56Z,2022-11-30T05:07:55Z,OWNER,,"It shows up on https://latest.datasette.io/-/api (once you are signed in as root) - but there's no point in creating tables in it because they likely won't persist from one request to the next, as it's not a shared named database. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1917/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1468709531,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xirqb,1915,Interactive demo of Datasette 1.0 write APIs,9599,closed,0,,,6,2022-11-29T21:16:03Z,2022-11-30T04:05:46Z,2022-11-30T04:05:46Z,OWNER,,"I'm going to try to get this working on https://latest.datasette.io/ - it already has a way for people to sign in as root, but none of the databases there are writable. So I'm going to build a plugin which adds a writable named in-memory database. And some kind of mechanism for clearing out that database on a regular basis - maybe tables in that database get deleted automatically an hour after they are created? (Would be neat to display their time-left-until-deleted too)",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1915/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1421529723,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UutJ7,1850,Write API in Datasette core,9599,closed,0,,8658075,13,2022-10-24T22:13:24Z,2022-11-29T20:11:20Z,2022-11-29T20:11:20Z,OWNER,,"I need this for Datasette Cloud, and in thinking it through I realized that it's really time Datasette grew a default write API as well. I'm going to mostly model this off `sqlite-utils`, since I've spent a bunch of time iterating on a pseudo-JSON API for that over the past few years (piping JSON to stdin etc). I want this for Datasette 1.0. I'm going to be building it in the new [1.0-dev](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/tree/1.0-dev) branch, which is automatically deployed to https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/ running on Cloud Run. API features to build: - [x] #1852 - [x] #1856 - [x] #1857 - [x] #1858 - [x] #1859 - [x] #1871 - [x] #1888 - [x] #1868 - [x] #1851 - [x] #1863 - [x] #1864 - [x] #1866 - [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882 - [x] #1862 - [x] #1874 - [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1887 - [x] #1877 Bumped to later on: - #1855 - #1878 - #1873 - #1875 - Make sure CORS works - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1889 - Alter a table - `sqlite-utils transform` style (more powerful than straight ALTER) - Execute SQL against a write connection - Maybe even multiple write SQL statements bundled in a single transaction - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1867 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1850/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1468603401,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XiRwJ,1913,Release Datasette 1.0a0,9599,closed,0,,8658075,9,2022-11-29T19:41:42Z,2022-11-29T20:10:35Z,2022-11-29T20:10:35Z,OWNER,,"I attempted the release just now - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/1.0a0 - and got an unexpected test failure: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3577355358/attempts/1 ``` > assert delete_response.status_code == 200 E assert 404 == 200 E + where 404 = .status_code /home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/tests/test_api_write.py:396: AssertionError =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED tests/test_api_write.py::test_delete_row[compound_pk_table-row_for_create2-pks2-article,k] - assert 404 == 200 + where 404 = .status_code ``` I hit ""retry"" on that test but I expect it to fail again. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1913/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1432012302,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWsYO,1877,Refactor and tidy up final write API code,9599,closed,0,,,1,2022-11-01T20:00:11Z,2022-11-29T19:44:16Z,2022-11-29T19:44:07Z,OWNER,,"- `views/table.py` has got a bit too big - I think the write classes should be pulled out into a separate module. - [x] There's duplicate logic for deciding if the table and database exist and checking permissions",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1877/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1450312343,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WcgKX,1892,Merge 1.0-dev branch back to main,9599,closed,0,,8658075,3,2022-11-15T20:04:25Z,2022-11-29T19:40:23Z,2022-11-29T19:40:23Z,OWNER,,"I'm committed enough to the 1.0 work now that I'm ready for the `main` branch to reflect that instead. If I need to make any dot-releases against 0.63 I can do those from a branch.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1892/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1468592292,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5D6nzE,1912,Merge 1.0-dev (with initial write API) back into main,9599,closed,0,,,1,2022-11-29T19:31:21Z,2022-11-29T19:39:37Z,2022-11-29T19:39:36Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1912,"See: - #1892 ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1912.org.readthedocs.build/en/1912/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1912/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1450303205,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wcd7l,1891,1.0a0 release notes,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-11-15T19:58:20Z,2022-11-29T19:23:41Z,2022-11-29T19:23:41Z,OWNER,,"This release will mainly help preview the new Datasette write API: - #1850",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1891/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1425029275,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U8Dib,1864,Delete a single record from an existing table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-10-27T04:53:22Z,2022-11-29T18:54:04Z,2022-11-29T18:54:04Z,OWNER,,"API design: ``` POST /db/table/row-pks/-/delete Or... DELETE /db/table/row-pks/-/delete ``` I'm just going to do `POST` for the moment, like I did here: - #1874 Permission: `delete-row` Still needed: - [ ] Tests for rowid tables - [ ] Tests for compound primary keys",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1864/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1468519699,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh9UT,1911,`/db/-/create` should support creating tables with compound primary keys,9599,closed,0,,8658075,2,2022-11-29T18:30:47Z,2022-11-29T18:50:58Z,2022-11-29T18:48:05Z,OWNER,,"Found myself needing this to write the tests for: - #1864 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1911/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1425029242,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U8Dh6,1863,Update a single record in an existing table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,16,2022-10-27T04:53:17Z,2022-11-29T18:08:53Z,2022-11-29T18:06:37Z,OWNER,,"API design: ``` POST /db/table/row-pks/-/update { ""field"": ""updated_value"" } ``` Only the fields that you pass will be updated. Maybe this is the wrong design though? The design for insert currently looks like this: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1294224185 ``` POST /db/table/-/insert Authorization: Bearer xxx Content-Type: application/json { ""row"": { ""id"": 1, ""name"": ""New name"" } } ``` I could use the same format for `/-/update`, but in this case the API doesn't require you to pass every field so `""row""` doesn't seem like the right key. I think I'll go with this: ``` POST /db/table/1/-/update Authorization: Bearer xxx Content-Type: application/json { ""update"": { ""name"": ""New name"" } } ``` The benefit of having an `""update""` key is that it allows me to use other keys in the future. Maybe a `""alter"": true` key to indicate that new columns should be added if they are missing.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1466952626,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xb-uy,1909,Option to sort facets alphabetically,9599,open,0,,,1,2022-11-28T19:18:14Z,2022-11-28T19:19:26Z,,OWNER,,"Suggested here: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/discussions/1908",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1909/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1455928469,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx7SV,1903,Refactor all error classes into a datasette.exceptions module,9599,open,0,,3268330,2,2022-11-18T22:44:45Z,2022-11-20T22:35:01Z,,OWNER,,"While working on this issue: - #1896 I realized that Datasette has error classes scattered around a fair bit, including some in the `datasette.utils.asgi` module for some reason. I should clean these up.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1903/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1456012874,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WyP5K,1905,`publish heroku` failing due to old Python version,9599,closed,0,,,4,2022-11-19T00:01:45Z,2022-11-19T01:12:05Z,2022-11-19T00:52:29Z,OWNER,,"Reported on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/823971286941302908/1042814317118115901 ``` -----> Building on the Heroku-22 stack -----> Determining which buildpack to use for this app -----> Python app detected -----> Using Python version specified in runtime.txt ! Requested runtime 'python-3.8.10' is not available for this stack (heroku-22). ! For supported versions, see: https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/python-support ! Push rejected, failed to compile Python app. ! Push failed ▸ Build failed ``` ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1905/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1456013930,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WyQJq,1906,Extract publish Heroku support to a plugin,9599,open,0,,3268330,0,2022-11-19T00:02:51Z,2022-11-19T00:03:10Z,,OWNER,,"> This is a strong argument for extracting the Heroku support out to a plugin - it would allow this to be fixed with a plugin release without needing to push a full release of Datasette itself. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1905#issuecomment-1320678715_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1906/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1455932972,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx8Ys,1904,Datasette Lite tests failing due to httpx upgrade,9599,closed,0,,8658075,0,2022-11-18T22:49:31Z,2022-11-18T22:57:48Z,2022-11-18T22:52:22Z,OWNER,,"Same problem as this one: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-lite/issues/56 Caused this failure: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3500765964",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1904/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1452364777,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WkVPp,1896,Extract logic for resolving a URL to a database / table / row,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-11-16T22:25:20Z,2022-11-18T22:57:47Z,2022-11-18T22:56:55Z,OWNER,,"> In trying to write this I realize that there's a lot of duplicated code with delete row, specifically around resolving the incoming URL into a row (or a database or a table). > > Since this is so common, I think it's worth extracting the logic out first. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1317755263_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1896/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1454532488,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WsmeI,1902,Document {% block crumbs %} for plugin authors,9599,open,0,,3268330,0,2022-11-18T06:16:30Z,2022-11-18T06:16:39Z,,OWNER,,"> For `datasette-copyable` I want to show breadcrumbs that take database/instance permissions into account, so I'm removing `{% block nav %}` entirely and replacing it with this: > > ```html+jinja > {% block crumbs %} > {{ crumbs.nav(request=request, database=database, table=table) }} > {% endblock %} > ``` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1901#issuecomment-1319588163_ I should document this.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1902/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1452457263,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wkr0v,1897,Serve schema JSON to the SQL editor to enable autocomplete,9599,closed,0,,,9,2022-11-16T23:47:45Z,2022-11-18T05:33:20Z,2022-11-18T02:54:43Z,OWNER,,"See: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1893#issuecomment-1317831555 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1897/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1447388809,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRWaJ,1887,Add a confirm step to the drop table API,9599,closed,0,,8658075,2,2022-11-14T04:59:53Z,2022-11-15T19:59:59Z,2022-11-14T05:18:51Z,OWNER,,"> In playing with the API explorer just now I realized it's way too easy to accidentally drop a table using it. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1871#issuecomment-1313097057_ Added drop table API in: - #1874",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1887/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1429030341,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VLUXF,1874,API to drop a table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-10-30T21:55:11Z,2022-11-15T19:59:53Z,2022-11-14T05:45:06Z,OWNER,,"`POST /db/table/-/drop` Require `drop-table` permission.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1874/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1425011030,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U7_FW,1862,"Create a new table from one or more records, `sqlite-utils` style",9599,closed,0,,8658075,5,2022-10-27T04:25:02Z,2022-11-15T19:59:47Z,2022-11-15T06:42:09Z,OWNER,,"It's interesting to also think about what the form-based UI for this could look like - since that would involve users creating new columns of different types on the fly. Will need the `create-table` permission.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1862/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1435294468,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VjNsE,1882,`/db/-/create` API for creating tables,9599,closed,0,,8658075,12,2022-11-03T21:44:32Z,2022-11-15T19:59:43Z,2022-11-15T06:00:41Z,OWNER,,"> It really feels like this should be accompanied by a `/db/-/create` API for creating tables. I had to add that to `sqlite-utils` eventually (initially it only supported creating by passing in an example document): > > https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#cli-create-table _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1862#issuecomment-1299073433_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1426001541,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U_w6F,1866,API for bulk inserting records into a table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,12,2022-10-27T17:19:25Z,2022-11-15T19:59:34Z,2022-10-30T06:04:07Z,OWNER,,"Similar to https://github.com/simonw/datasette-insert/blob/0.8/README.md#inserting-data-and-creating-tables I expect this to become by far the most common way that data gets into a Datasette instance - more so than the individual row API in: - #1851 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1866/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1421544654,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UuwzO,1851,API to insert a single record into an existing table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,22,2022-10-24T22:24:21Z,2022-11-15T19:59:18Z,2022-10-28T00:59:25Z,OWNER,,Controlled by a new `insert-row` permission.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1426195437,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAgPt,1868,Design URLs for the write API,9599,closed,0,,8658075,5,2022-10-27T19:55:30Z,2022-11-15T19:59:14Z,2022-10-27T20:07:01Z,OWNER,,"My original design for this issue: - #1851 Was `POST /db/table` with JSON of `{""insert"": {...}}`.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1868/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1447439985,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRi5x,1888,API explorer should take immutability into account,9599,closed,0,,8658075,1,2022-11-14T06:00:14Z,2022-11-15T19:59:10Z,2022-11-14T06:04:48Z,OWNER,,"Refs: - #1871 I noticed the API explorer doesn't show any links on https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/-/api because the `fixtures` database is immutable. It should still show read examples there.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1888/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1427293909,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VEsbV,1871,API explorer tool,9599,closed,0,,8658075,24,2022-10-28T13:49:11Z,2022-11-15T19:59:05Z,2022-11-14T04:59:59Z,OWNER,,The API will be much easier to develop if there's a page that helps you execute JSON POSTs against it.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1871/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1423369494,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1uUW,1859,datasette create-token CLI command,9599,closed,0,,8658075,3,2022-10-26T03:12:59Z,2022-11-15T19:59:00Z,2022-10-26T04:31:39Z,OWNER,,The CLI equivalent of the `/-/create-token` page.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1859/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1423364990,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1tN-,1858,`max_signed_tokens_ttl` setting for a maximum duration on API tokens,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-10-26T03:05:53Z,2022-11-15T19:58:52Z,2022-10-27T03:15:05Z,OWNER,,"It's currently possible to use `/-/create-token` to create a token that lasts forever. Some administrators may wish to have a maximum expiry instead. I should support that with a setting.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1858/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1423347412,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1o7U,1857,Prevent API tokens from using /-/create-token to create more tokens,9599,closed,0,,8658075,1,2022-10-26T02:38:09Z,2022-11-15T19:57:11Z,2022-10-26T02:57:26Z,OWNER,,"> It strikes me that users should NOT be able to use a token to create additional tokens. > > The current design actually does allow that, since the `dstok_` Bearer token can be used to authenticate calls to the `/-/create-token` page. > > So I think I need a mechanism whereby that page can only allow access to users authenticated by cookie. > > Not obvious how to do that though, since Datasette's authentication actor system is designed to abstract that detail away! _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1291417100_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1857/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1423336122,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1mK6,1856,allow_signed_tokens setting for disabling API signed token mechanism,9599,closed,0,,8658075,3,2022-10-26T02:20:55Z,2022-11-15T19:57:05Z,2022-10-26T02:58:35Z,OWNER,,"Had some design thoughts here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291272280 I liked this option the most: --setting allow_create_tokens off",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1856/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1421552095,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Uuynf,1852,Default API token authentication mechanism,9599,closed,0,,8658075,30,2022-10-24T22:31:07Z,2022-11-15T19:57:00Z,2022-10-26T02:19:54Z,OWNER,,"API authentication will be via `Authorization: Bearer XXX` request headers. I'm inclined to add a default token mechanism to Datasette based on tokens that are signed with the `DATASETTE_SECRET`. Maybe the root user can access `/-/create-token` which provides a UI for generating a time-limited signed token? Could also have a `datasette token` command for creating such tokens at the command-line. Plugins can then define alternative ways of creating tokens, such as the existing https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-auth-tokens plugin. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1289706439_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1432037325,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWyfN,1879,Make it easier to fix URL proxy problems,9599,open,0,,,5,2022-11-01T20:19:23Z,2022-11-01T20:33:52Z,,OWNER,,"This came up on Discord again today: figuring out how to run Datasette behind a proxy that might hide the incoming Host: header (and strip HTTPS) is really hard! https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/823971286941302908/1037012475322847263",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1879/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1431786951,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VV1XH,1876,SQL query should wrap on SQL interrupted screen,9599,closed,0,,,2,2022-11-01T17:14:01Z,2022-11-01T17:22:33Z,2022-11-01T17:22:33Z,OWNER,,"Just saw this: ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1876/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1426253476,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAuak,1869,Release 0.63,9599,closed,0,,,3,2022-10-27T20:53:01Z,2022-10-27T22:24:38Z,2022-10-27T22:11:33Z,OWNER,,"Most of the release notes are already written: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.63a0 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.63a1",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1869/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1342430983,I_kwDOBm6k_c5QA98H,1786,Adjust height of textarea for no JS case,9599,closed,0,,,4,2022-08-18T01:15:15Z,2022-10-27T21:50:12Z,2022-08-18T16:06:09Z,OWNER,,"Datasette Lite: https://lite.datasette.io/?sql=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/simonw/1f8a91123ccefd8844187225b1832d7a/raw/5069075b86aa79358fbab3d4482d1d269077d632/recipes.sql#/data?sql=select+id%2C+name%2C+ingredients%2C+%28%0A++select+json_group_array%28value%29+from+json_each%28ingredients%29%0A++where+value+in+%28select+value+from+json_each%28%3Ap0%29%29%0A%29+as+matching_ingredients%0Afrom+recipes%0Awhere+json_array_length%28matching_ingredients%29+%3E+0%0Aorder+by+json_array_length%28matching_ingredients%29+desc&p0=%5B%22sugar%22%2C+%22cheese%22%5D ![46F8101E-8CE3-4F61-B200-F865E6B5DBCC](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/185270723-f55513b0-b561-434d-9d7c-4fe5be9756e0.jpeg) ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1786/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1425682079,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U-i6f,1865,Stop syncing main to master,9599,closed,0,,,1,2022-10-27T13:55:38Z,2022-10-27T13:58:27Z,2022-10-27T13:56:13Z,OWNER,,"I think it's been long enough now that I can drop the code that syncs the main branch to master. I originally added this for people who might be using `datasette publish ... --branch master` - which might only have been me anyway!",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1865/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 639072811,MDU6SXNzdWU2MzkwNzI4MTE=,849,Rename master branch to main,9599,closed,0,,3268330,10,2020-06-15T19:05:54Z,2022-10-27T13:57:08Z,2020-09-15T20:37:14Z,OWNER,,"I was waiting for consensus to form around this (and kind-of hoping for `trunk` since I like the tree metaphor) and it looks like `main` is it. I've seen convincing arguments against `trunk` too - it indicates that the branch has some special significance like in Subversion (where all branches come from trunk) when it doesn't. So `main` is better anyway.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/849/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1424980545,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U73pB,1861,"request.headers.get(""Content-Type"") fails",9599,open,0,,,0,2022-10-27T03:39:12Z,2022-10-27T03:39:12Z,,OWNER,,"Turns out this is case-sensitive, needs to be: request.headers.get(""content-type"") != ""application/json"" That's not great usability. It should be case insensitive.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1861/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1420174670,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UpiVO,1849,NoneType' object has no attribute 'actor',9599,closed,0,,,5,2022-10-24T04:02:15Z,2022-10-26T21:13:40Z,2022-10-26T21:13:40Z,OWNER,,"``` File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/datasette/templates/_crumbs.html"", line 3, in template {% set items=crumb_items(request=request, database=database, table=table) %} File ""jinja2/async_utils.py"", line 65, in auto_await return await t.cast(""t.Awaitable[V]"", value) File ""datasette/app.py"", line 638, in _crumb_items actor=request.actor, action=""view-instance"", default=True ``` From Sentry.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1849/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 642297505,MDU6SXNzdWU2NDIyOTc1MDU=,857,Comprehensive documentation for variables made available to templates,9599,closed,0,,3268330,1,2020-06-20T03:19:43Z,2022-10-26T02:58:17Z,2022-10-26T02:58:17Z,OWNER,,"Needed for the Datasette 1.0 release, so template authors can trust that Datasette is unlikely to break their templates.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/857/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1422973111,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U0Ni3,1854,Flaky test: test_serve_localhost_http,9599,closed,0,,,3,2022-10-25T19:37:35Z,2022-10-25T19:53:02Z,2022-10-25T19:53:02Z,OWNER,,Failing on Python 3.10 at the moment: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3323629947/jobs/5494340302,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1854/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1422915587,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Uz_gD,1853,Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11,9599,closed,0,,,7,2022-10-25T18:44:31Z,2022-10-25T19:28:56Z,2022-10-25T19:05:16Z,OWNER,,"Related: - #1768 I think this base image looks right: [3.11.0-slim-bullseye](https://hub.docker.com/layers/library/python/3.11.0-slim-bullseye/images/sha256-244c0b0e6e7608a16f87382fc8a5ef3c330d042113a9a7b6fc15a95360181651?context=explore)",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1420090659,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UpN0j,1848,Private database page should show padlock on every table,9599,closed,0,,,3,2022-10-24T02:28:38Z,2022-10-24T02:50:29Z,2022-10-24T02:42:34Z,OWNER,,"Following: - #1829 https://latest.datasette.io/_internal looks like this: But those queries and tables are private too, and should also show the padlock icon.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1848/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1396948693,I_kwDOBm6k_c5TQ77V,1829,Table/database that is private due to inherited permissions does not show padlock,9599,closed,0,,,8,2022-10-04T23:14:16Z,2022-10-24T02:23:46Z,2022-10-24T02:11:37Z,OWNER,,"I noticed that a table page that is private because the database or instance is private, e.g. this one: Is not displaying the padlock icon that indicates the table is not visible to the public. Same issue for the database page too, which in this case is private due to `view-instance`.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1829/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1408561039,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5Axrpb,1842,check_visibility can now take multiple permissions into account,9599,closed,0,,,3,2022-10-14T00:06:04Z,2022-10-24T02:11:36Z,2022-10-24T02:11:36Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1842,"Refs #1829 - [x] Fix table page - [x] Fix database page - [x] Fix query page - [x] Fix row page - [x] Tests - [x] Updated documentation for `check_visibility` method, to cover the new `permissions=` keyword argument Also this fix is currently only applied on the table page - needs to be applied on database, row and query pages too. ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1842.org.readthedocs.build/en/1842/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1842/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1420055377,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UpFNR,1847,Both _local_metadata and _metadata_local?,9599,closed,0,,,2,2022-10-24T01:43:08Z,2022-10-24T01:53:13Z,2022-10-24T01:53:13Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this in the debugger against the `datasette` object while running tests (`pytest -k test_permissions_cascade` to be exact): ``` (Pdb) [p for p in dir(self) if p.startswith('_') and '__' not in p] ['_actor', '_asset_urls', '_connected_databases', '_crumb_items', '_local_metadata', '_metadata', '_metadata_local', '_metadata_recursive_update', '_permission_checks', '_plugins', '_prepare_connection', '_refresh_schemas', '_refresh_schemas_lock', '_register_custom_units', '_register_renderers', '_root_token', '_routes', '_secret', '_settings', '_show_messages', '_startup_hook_calculation', '_startup_hook_fired', '_startup_invoked', '_threads', '_versions', '_write_messages_to_response'] ``` ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1847/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1410305897,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UD49p,1845,Reconsider the Datasette first-run experience,9599,open,0,,,3,2022-10-15T22:21:31Z,2022-10-16T08:54:53Z,,OWNER,,"Had a really interesting conversation today about how hard it is to get from ""I installed Datasette"" to ""I've done something useful with it"": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33216789#33218590 Spending some time focusing on that first-run experience feels very worthwhile.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1845/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1409679008,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UBf6g,1844,Update screenshots in documentation to match latest designs,9599,closed,0,,,18,2022-10-14T18:01:18Z,2022-10-14T23:51:46Z,2022-10-14T19:57:17Z,OWNER,,"https://docs.datasette.io/en/0.62/full_text_search.html has this out-of-date screenshot: ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1844/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1397084281,I_kwDOBm6k_c5TRdB5,1831,If user can see table but NOT database/instance nav links should not display,9599,closed,0,,,10,2022-10-05T02:16:31Z,2022-10-13T21:52:04Z,2022-10-13T21:52:04Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this bug while building this plugin: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-public This is a public table, but the two links in the nav go to forbidden pages: Those nav links shouldn't be shown at all.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1831/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1406860394,I_kwDOBm6k_c5T2vxq,1841,Drop format_bytes for Jinja filesizeformat filter,9599,open,0,,,0,2022-10-12T22:06:34Z,2022-10-12T22:06:34Z,,OWNER,,"Turns out this isn't necessary: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/5aa359b86907d11b3ee601510775a85a90224da8/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L849-L858 I can use this instead: https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/3.1.x/templates/#jinja-filters.filesizeformat",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1841/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 912864936,MDU6SXNzdWU5MTI4NjQ5MzY=,1362,Consider using CSP to protect against future XSS,9599,open,0,,,17,2021-06-06T15:32:20Z,2022-10-08T18:42:09Z,,OWNER,,The XSS in #1360 would have been a lot less damaging if Datasette used CSP to protect against such vulnerabilities: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CSP,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1362/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1399933513,I_kwDOBm6k_c5TcUpJ,1833,Ability to submit long queries by POST,9599,open,0,,,0,2022-10-06T16:03:26Z,2022-10-06T16:18:00Z,,OWNER,,"Datasette doesn't limit URL lengths but some common web proxies do - the one in front of Google Cloud Run for example limits to 8KB total for incoming request headers: https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/quotas#https-lb-header-limits This means longer SQL queries can break! Need an optional mechanism for submitting queries by POST instead.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1833/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1386917344,PR_kwDOBm6k_c4_prjN,1823,Keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods,9599,open,0,,,3,2022-09-27T00:44:59Z,2022-10-05T04:37:54Z,,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1823,"Refs #1822 ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1823.org.readthedocs.build/en/1823/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1823/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1397193691,I_kwDOBm6k_c5TR3vb,1832,__bool__ method on Results,9599,closed,0,,,2,2022-10-05T04:18:12Z,2022-10-05T04:32:33Z,2022-10-05T04:32:33Z,OWNER,,"Wrote this code today: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-public/blob/1401bfae50e71c1dfd2bfb6954f2e86d5a7ab21b/datasette_public/__init__.py#L41 ```python results = await db.execute( ""select 1 from _public_tables where table_name = ?"", [table_name] ) if len(results): return True ``` Would be nice if I could use `if results` there instead.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1832/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1396977994,I_kwDOBm6k_c5TRDFK,1830,Add documentation for writing tests with signed actor cookies,9599,open,0,,,0,2022-10-04T23:51:26Z,2022-10-04T23:51:26Z,,OWNER,,"I use this pattirn in a lot of plugin tests, e.g. https://github.com/simonw/datasette-edit-templates/blob/087f6a6cabc20020f2b0524f11aa3a7836320848/tests/test_edit_templates.py#L55-L58 ```python actor = ds.sign({""a"": {""id"": ""root""}}, ""actor"") response1 = await ds.client.get( ""/-/edit-templates/_footer.html"", cookies={""ds_actor"": actor} ) ``` I should add this to the documentation on this page: https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/testing_plugins.html",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1830/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 447469253,MDU6SXNzdWU0NDc0NjkyNTM=,485,Improvements to table label detection ,9599,open,0,9599,,10,2019-05-23T06:19:49Z,2022-10-03T00:04:42Z,,OWNER,,"Label detection doesn't work if the primary key is called pk rather than id, so this page doesn't work: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/roadside_attraction_characteristics Code is here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cccea85be6aaaeadb31f3b588ec7f732628815f5/datasette/app.py#L644-L653",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/485/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1393903845,I_kwDOBm6k_c5TFUjl,1828,word-wrap: anywhere resulting in weird display,9599,closed,0,,,2,2022-10-02T21:25:03Z,2022-10-02T23:01:17Z,2022-10-02T23:01:17Z,OWNER,,"e.g. on https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/commits This is from a change introduced here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/bf8d84af5422606597be893cedd375020cb2b369 in #1805 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/bf8d84af5422606597be893cedd375020cb2b369/datasette/static/app.css#L447-L450",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1828/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1122427321,I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5uG5,1624,Index page `/` has no CORS headers,9599,open,0,,,2,2022-02-02T21:56:10Z,2022-09-28T16:54:22Z,,OWNER,,"Compare the following: ``` % curl -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures' HTTP/1.1 200 OK link: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures.json; rel=""alternate""; type=""application/json+datasette"" cache-control: max-age=5 referrer-policy: no-referrer access-control-allow-origin: * access-control-allow-headers: Authorization access-control-expose-headers: Link content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 x-databases: _memory, _internal, fixtures, extra_database Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:55:49 GMT Server: Google Frontend Transfer-Encoding: chunked % curl -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/' HTTP/1.1 200 OK link: https://latest.datasette.io/.json; rel=""alternate""; type=""application/json+datasette"" content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 x-databases: _memory, _internal, fixtures, extra_database Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:55:52 GMT Server: Google Frontend Transfer-Encoding: chunked ```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1624/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 732674148,MDU6SXNzdWU3MzI2NzQxNDg=,1062,Refactor .csv to be an output renderer - and teach register_output_renderer to stream all rows,9599,open,0,,3268330,5,2020-10-29T21:25:02Z,2022-09-28T14:09:54Z,,OWNER,,This can drive the upgrade of the `register_output_renderer` hook to be able to handle streaming all rows in a large query.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1062/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1386854246,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sqbdm,1822,Switch to keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods,9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2022-09-26T23:20:38Z,2022-09-27T00:44:04Z,,OWNER,,"This is a good idea, and one that needs to happen before Datasette 1.0: > While you are adding features, would you be future-proofing your APIs if you switched over some arguments over to keyword-only arguments or would that be too disruptive? > > Thinking out loud: > > ``` > async def render_template( > self, templates, *, context=None, plugin_context=None, request=None, view_name=None > ): > ``` _Originally posted by @jefftriplett in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256781274_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1822/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1384273985,I_kwDOBm6k_c5SglhB,1817,Expose `sql` and `params` arguments to various plugin hooks,9599,open,0,,,7,2022-09-23T20:34:45Z,2022-09-27T00:27:53Z,,OWNER,,"On Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/996877076982415491/1022784534363787305 > Hi! I'm attempting to write a plugin that would provide some statistics on text fields (most common words, etc). I would want this information displayed in the table pages, and (ideally) also updated when users make custom queries from the table pages. > > It seems one way to do this would be to use the extra_template_vars hook, and make the appropriate SQL query there. So extra_template_vars would create a variable that is a list of most common words, and this is displayed on the page, possibly above the regular table view. > > Is there a way that the plugin code can access the SQL query (or even the data) that was used to produce the table view? I can see that TableView class constructs the SQL query, but I can't seem to find a way to access that information from the objects that are available to extra_template_vars. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1817/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1386734383,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sp-Mv,1821,Release Datasette 0.63a0,9599,closed,0,,,1,2022-09-26T21:15:27Z,2022-09-26T22:06:39Z,2022-09-26T22:06:39Z,OWNER,,"> - The [prepare_jinja2_environment(env, datasette)](https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/plugin_hooks.html#plugin-hook-prepare-jinja2-environment) plugin hook now accepts an optional `datasette` argument. Hook implementations can also now return an `async` function which will be awaited automatically. ([#1809](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1809)) > - `--load-extension` option now supports entrypoints. Thanks, Alex Garcia. ([#1789](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1789)) > - New tutorial: [Cleaning data with sqlite-utils and Datasette](https://datasette.io/tutorials/clean-data). > - Facet size can now be set per-table with the new `facet_size` table metadata option. ([#1804](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1804)) > - `truncate_cells_html` setting now also affects long URLs in columns. ([#1805](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1805)) > - `Database(is_mutable=)` now defaults to `True`. ([#1808](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1808)) > - Non-JavaScript textarea now increases height to fit the SQL query. ([#1786](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1786)) > - More detailed command descriptions on the [CLI reference](https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/cli-reference.html#cli-reference) page. ([#1787](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1787)) > - Datasette no longer enforces upper bounds on its depenedencies. ([#1800](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1800)) > - Facets are now displayed with better line-breaks in long values. Thanks, Daniel Rech. ([#1794](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1794)) > - The `settings.json` file used in [Configuration directory mode](https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/settings.html#config-dir) is now validated on startup. ([#1816](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1816))",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1821/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1217759117,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IlYeN,1727,Research: demonstrate if parallel SQL queries are worthwhile,9599,open,0,,,32,2022-04-27T18:54:21Z,2022-09-26T14:48:31Z,,OWNER,,"I added parallel SQL query execution here: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1723 My hunch is that this will take advantage of multiple cores, since Python's `sqlite3` module releases the GIL once a query is passed to SQLite. I'd really like to prove this is the case though. Just not sure how to do it! Larger question: is this performance optimization actually improving performance at all? Under what circumstances is it worthwhile?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1727/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1378640768,I_kwDOBm6k_c5SLGOA,1816,Validate settings.json on startup in configuration directory mode,9599,closed,0,,,2,2022-09-19T23:35:18Z,2022-09-20T01:15:48Z,2022-09-20T01:15:48Z,OWNER,,"> It might have been useful for Datasette to show an error when started against a `settings.json` file that contains an invalid setting though. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1814#issuecomment-1251677554_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1816/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1378636455,I_kwDOBm6k_c5SLFKn,1815,"`datasette publish provider .` to publish whole directory, similar to configuration directory mode",9599,open,0,,,0,2022-09-19T23:28:59Z,2022-09-19T23:29:11Z,,OWNER,,"> I haven't done this with any of my other `datasette publish` tools, but I do think it's a good idea. Being able to publish the entire directory - with templates and plugins and metadata - does seem very useful to me. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-fly/issues/23#issuecomment-1251673489_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1815/reactions"", ""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1373595927,I_kwDOBm6k_c5R32kX,1809,`prepare_jinja2_environment()` hook should take `datasette` argument,9599,closed,0,,,11,2022-09-14T21:15:46Z,2022-09-17T03:39:05Z,2022-09-17T03:38:33Z,OWNER,,"That plugin hook's current signature is: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/610425460b519e9c16d386cb81aa081c9d730ef0/datasette/hookspecs.py#L28-L30 As a result in the first alpha release of `datasette-edit-templates` I had to include this horrific hack: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-edit-templates/blob/087f6a6cabc20020f2b0524f11aa3a7836320848/datasette_edit_templates/__init__.py#L72-L75 ```python @hookimpl def prepare_jinja2_environment(env): # TODO: This should ideally take datasette, but that's not an argument yet datasette = inspect.currentframe().f_back.f_back.f_back.f_back.f_locals[""self""] ```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1809/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1374626873,I_kwDOBm6k_c5R7yQ5,1810,Featured table(s) on the homepage,9599,open,0,,,4,2022-09-15T14:30:49Z,2022-09-15T15:51:25Z,,OWNER,,"Many Datasette instances mainly exist to serve a single table - for example: - https://global-power-plants.datasettes.com/global-power-plants/global-power-plants - https://laion-aesthetic.datasette.io/laion-aesthetic-6pls/images It would be neat if the / homepage of those instances could be configured to highlight that specific table. Or maybe more than one?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1810/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1368030952,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Rin7o,1808,Database() constructor currently defaults is_mutable to False,9599,closed,0,,,5,2022-09-09T16:02:41Z,2022-09-09T16:37:57Z,2022-09-09T16:19:25Z,OWNER,,"This is surprising. It caused a bug in `datasette-upload-dbs` because I didn't expect it to do that. > I think this is an API design flaw in Datasette itself, but I can fix it here first. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-upload-dbs/issues/6#issuecomment-1242150394_ Code in question: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/bf8d84af5422606597be893cedd375020cb2b369/datasette/database.py#L29-L32",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1808/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1366915240,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ReXio,1807,Plugin ecosystem needs to avoid crashes due to no available databases,9599,open,0,,,1,2022-09-08T19:54:34Z,2022-09-08T20:14:05Z,,OWNER,,"Opening this here to track the issue first reported in: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-upload-dbs/issues/5 Plugins that expect to be able to write to a database need to not crash in situations where no writable database is available.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1807/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 507454958,MDU6SXNzdWU1MDc0NTQ5NTg=,596,Handle really wide tables better,9599,open,0,,,9,2019-10-15T20:05:46Z,2022-09-07T00:58:41Z,,OWNER,,"If a table has hundreds of columns the Datasette UI starts getting unwieldy. Addressing this would be neat. One option would be to only select the first 30 columns by default and provide a UI for selecting more.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1363440999,I_kwDOBm6k_c5RRHVn,1804,Ability to set a custom facet_size per table,9599,closed,0,,,6,2022-09-06T15:11:40Z,2022-09-07T00:21:56Z,2022-09-06T18:06:53Z,OWNER,,"Suggestion from Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/823971286941302908/1016725586351247430 > Is it possible to limit the facet size per database or even per table? This is a really good idea, it could be done in `metadata.yml`.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1804/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1362402998,I_kwDOBm6k_c5RNJ62,1802,Tests reliably failing on Python 3.7,9599,closed,0,,,15,2022-09-05T19:21:16Z,2022-09-06T00:40:20Z,2022-09-06T00:40:20Z,OWNER,," https://github.com/simonw/datasette/runs/8194907739?check_suite_focus=true I thought this might be an intermittent failure but attempts to re-run the tests have not made it pass. End of that trace is: ``` /home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/datasette/app.py:234: in __init__ self._refresh_schemas_lock = asyncio.Lock() /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.7.13/x64/lib/python3.7/asyncio/locks.py:161: in __init__ self._loop = events.get_event_loop() _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = def get_event_loop(self): """"""Get the event loop for the current context. Returns an instance of EventLoop or raises an exception. """""" if (self._local._loop is None and not self._local._set_called and isinstance(threading.current_thread(), threading._MainThread)): self.set_event_loop(self.new_event_loop()) if self._local._loop is None: raise RuntimeError('There is no current event loop in thread %r.' > % threading.current_thread().name) E RuntimeError: There is no current event loop in thread 'MainThread'. ```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1802/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1362567197,PR_kwDOBm6k_c4-ZxWD,1803,Workaround for test failure: RuntimeError: There is no current event loop,9599,closed,0,,,1,2022-09-06T00:31:06Z,2022-09-06T00:40:19Z,2022-09-06T00:40:19Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1803,"Closes #1802 ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1803.org.readthedocs.build/en/1803/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1803/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 903986178,MDU6SXNzdWU5MDM5ODYxNzg=,1344,Test Datasette Docker images built for different architectures,9599,open,0,,,10,2021-05-27T16:52:29Z,2022-09-06T00:07:58Z,,OWNER,,"Continuing on from #1319 - now that we have the ability to build Datasette's Docker image against multiple architectures we should test that it works. We can do this with QEMU emulation, see https://twitter.com/nevali/status/1397958044571602945",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1344/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1362363685,I_kwDOBm6k_c5RNAUl,1800,Remove upper bound dependencies as a default policy,9599,closed,0,,,3,2022-09-05T18:23:45Z,2022-09-05T18:39:52Z,2022-09-05T18:35:41Z,OWNER,,"https://iscinumpy.dev/post/bound-version-constraints/ has convinced me not to use upper bound dependencies unless I'm certain they are needed. Relevant PR: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1799 Also: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ba35105eee2d3ba620e4f230028a02b2e2571df2/setup.py#L45-L46 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ba35105eee2d3ba620e4f230028a02b2e2571df2/setup.py#L48-L49 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ba35105eee2d3ba620e4f230028a02b2e2571df2/setup.py#L51-L55 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ba35105eee2d3ba620e4f230028a02b2e2571df2/setup.py#L57-L59 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ba35105eee2d3ba620e4f230028a02b2e2571df2/setup.py#L75-L78 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ba35105eee2d3ba620e4f230028a02b2e2571df2/setup.py#L81-L82 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1800/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1362367821,PR_kwDOBm6k_c4-ZGW6,1801,"Don't use upper bound dependencies, refs #1800",9599,closed,0,,,1,2022-09-05T18:29:28Z,2022-09-05T18:35:41Z,2022-09-05T18:35:41Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1801,"See https://iscinumpy.dev/post/bound-version-constraints/ ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1801.org.readthedocs.build/en/1801/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1801/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 849978964,MDU6SXNzdWU4NDk5Nzg5NjQ=,1293,Show column metadata plus links for foreign keys on arbitrary query results,9599,open,0,,,51,2021-04-04T22:59:42Z,2022-09-02T17:34:09Z,,OWNER,,"Related to #620. It would be _really_ cool if Datasette could magically detect the source of the data displayed in an arbitrary query and, if that data represents a foreign key, display it as a hyperlink. Compare https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable To https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select+pk%2C+created%2C+planet_int%2C+on_earth%2C+state%2C+city_id%2C+neighborhood%2C+tags%2C+complex_array%2C+distinct_some_null+from+facetable+order+by+pk+limit+101 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1293/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,reopened 1353088849,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Qpn9R,1795,Consider automatically cleaning up curly quotes in searches,9599,open,0,,,0,2022-08-27T16:35:25Z,2022-08-27T16:35:25Z,,OWNER,,"If your phone helpfully adds curly quotes for you then phrase searches against FTS won't work: “Rebecca Sugar” In regular (not `?_searchmode=raw` search mode Datasette could clean these up for you to help avoid that mistake.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1795/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1348394901,PR_kwDOBm6k_c49qmC2,1792,Test `--load-extension` in GitHub Actions,9599,closed,0,,,3,2022-08-23T18:43:29Z,2022-08-24T00:11:46Z,2022-08-24T00:11:45Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1792,"Refs: - #1789 ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1792.org.readthedocs.build/en/1792/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1792/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1345561209,I_kwDOBm6k_c5QM6J5,1790,A better HTML title for canned query pages,9599,open,0,,,0,2022-08-21T18:27:46Z,2022-08-21T18:27:46Z,,OWNER,,"https://scotrail.datasette.io/scotrail/assemble_sentence?terms=This+train+is+formed+of%2Cbomb+which Current title is: `scotrail: with phrases as ( select key, value from json_each('["' || replace(:terms, ',', '","') || '"]')),matches as (select phrases.key, phrases.value, ( select File from announcements where announcements.Transcription like '%' || trim(phrases.value) || '%' order by length(announcements.Transcription) limit 1 ) as Filefrom phrases),results as ( select key, announcements.Transcription, announcements.mp3 from announcements join matches on announcements.File = matches.File order by key)select 'Combined sentence:' as mp3, group_concat(Transcription, ' ') as Transcription, -1 as keyfrom results unionselect mp3, Transcription, keyfrom resultsorder by key` I think a better title would be: `scotrail: assemble_sentence, terms = This train is formed of,bomb which`",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1790/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,