id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 836273891,MDU6SXNzdWU4MzYyNzM4OTE=,1266,Documentation for Response.asgi_send(send) method,9599,closed,0,,,1,2021-03-19T18:52:49Z,2021-03-20T21:35:00Z,2021-03-20T21:32:28Z,OWNER,,"I found myself wanting to use this method for https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-passwords/issues/15 - but it's not documented. It should be documented. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/8e18c7943181f228ce5ebcea48deb59ce50bee1f/datasette/utils/asgi.py#L320-L340",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1266/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 836123030,MDU6SXNzdWU4MzYxMjMwMzA=,1265,Support for HTTP Basic Authentication,468612,closed,0,,,3,2021-03-19T15:31:09Z,2021-03-19T22:05:12Z,2021-03-19T21:03:09Z,NONE,,"It would be nice if datasette could support [HTTP Basic Authentication](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication). For now I could ofcourse leverage Nginx for basic authentication, but it would be nice to have support for this in datasette by default or via a plugin like datasette-auth-github. My main usecase is to put the whole datasette instance behind a username/password prompt via Basic Auth and not specific urls.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1265/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 824067604,MDU6SXNzdWU4MjQwNjc2MDQ=,1250,Research: Plugin hook for alternative database connections,9599,closed,0,,,2,2021-03-08T00:28:15Z,2021-03-12T01:01:25Z,2021-03-12T01:01:17Z,OWNER,,"The `Database` class is a natural looking fit for a plugin hook to load custom database connections... potentially even databases other than SQLite. DuckDB (refs #968) could make for a great starting point, since it looks very compatible with the existing SQLite code. The real win would be if this could lead to running Datasette against PostgreSQL. I made some initial explorations in that direction a while ago in #670.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1250/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 797649915,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTY0NjA4MjY0,1211,Use context manager instead of plain open,4488943,closed,0,,,3,2021-01-31T07:58:10Z,2021-03-11T16:15:50Z,2021-03-11T16:15:50Z,CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/1211,"Context manager with open closes the files after usage. Fixes: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1208 When the object is already a pathlib.Path i used read_text write_text functions In some cases pathlib.Path.open were used in context manager, it is basically the same as builtin open. Tests are passing: 850 passed, 5 xfailed, 10 xpassed",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1211/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 794554881,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTQ1NTQ4ODE=,1208,A lot of open(file) functions are used without a context manager thus producing ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.TextIOWrapper,4488943,closed,0,,,2,2021-01-26T20:56:28Z,2021-03-11T16:15:49Z,2021-03-11T16:15:49Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,"Your code is full of open files that are never closed, especially when you deal with reading/writing json/yaml files. If you run python with warnings enabled this problem becomes evident. This probably contributes to some memory leaks in long running datasettes if the GC will not 'collect' those resources properly. This is easily fixed by using a context manager instead of just using open: ```python with open('some_file', 'w') as opened_file: opened_file.write('string') ``` In some newer parts of the code you use Path objects 'read_text' and 'write_text' functions which close the file properly and are prefered in some cases. If you want I can create a PR for all places i found this pattern in. Bellow is a fraction of places where i found a ResourceWarning: ```python update-docs-help.py: 20 actual = actual.replace(""Usage: cli "", ""Usage: datasette "") 21: open(docs_path / filename, ""w"").write(actual) 22 datasette\app.py: 210 ): 211: inspect_data = json.load((config_dir / ""inspect-data.json"").open()) 212 if immutables is None: 266 if config_dir and (config_dir / ""settings.json"").exists() and not config: 267: config = json.load((config_dir / ""settings.json"").open()) 268 self._settings = dict(DEFAULT_SETTINGS, **(config or {})) 445 self._app_css_hash = hashlib.sha1( 446: open(os.path.join(str(app_root), ""datasette/static/app.css"")) 447 .read() datasette\cli.py: 130 else: 131: out = open(inspect_file, ""w"") 132 loop = asyncio.get_event_loop() 459 if inspect_file: 460: inspect_data = json.load(open(inspect_file)) 461 ``` ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1208/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 826613352,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTg4NjAxNjI3,1254,Update Docker Spatialite version to 5.0.1 + add support for Spatialite topology functions,3200608,closed,0,,,6,2021-03-09T20:49:08Z,2021-03-10T18:27:45Z,2021-03-09T22:04:23Z,NONE,simonw/datasette/pulls/1254,"This requires adding the RT Topology library (Spatialite changed to RT Topology from LWGEOM between 4.4 and 5.0), as well as upgrading the GEOS version (which is the reason for switching to `python:3.7.10-slim-buster` as the base image.) `autoconf` and `libtool` are added to build RT Topology, and Spatialite is now built with `--disable-minizip` (minizip wasn't an option in 4.4 and I didn't want to add another dependency) and `--disable-dependency-tracking` which, according to Spatialite, ""speeds up one-time builds""",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1254/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 827341657,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTg5MjYzMjk3,1256,Minor type in IP adress,6371750,closed,0,,,3,2021-03-10T08:28:22Z,2021-03-10T18:26:46Z,2021-03-10T18:26:40Z,CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/1256,127.0.01 replaced by 127.0.0.1,107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1256/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 823035080,MDU6SXNzdWU4MjMwMzUwODA=,1248,duckdb database (very low performance in SQLite),15836677,closed,0,,,1,2021-03-05T12:20:29Z,2021-03-08T00:25:27Z,2021-03-08T00:25:27Z,NONE,,"My sqlite is getting too big to be processed by datasette (more than 10 minutes waiting to load) so I am working with duckdb and is waaaaay faster. I think the fastest embeddable database actually. https://duckdb.org/ Taking into account DuckDb is SQLite based it would be GREAT to use it with datasette. is that possible? Regards and thanks for a superb job",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1248/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 806918878,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTcyMjU0MTAz,1223,Add compile option to Dockerfile to fix failing test (fixes #696),7476523,closed,0,,,2,2021-02-12T03:38:05Z,2021-03-07T12:01:12Z,2021-03-07T07:41:17Z,CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/1223,"This test was failing when run inside the Docker container: `test_searchable[/fixtures/searchable.json?_search=te*+AND+do*&_searchmode=raw-expected_rows3]`, with this error: ``` def test_searchable(app_client, path, expected_rows): response = app_client.get(path) > assert expected_rows == response.json[""rows""] E AssertionError: assert [[1, 'barry c...sel', 'puma']] == [] E Left contains 2 more items, first extra item: [1, 'barry cat', 'terry dog', 'panther'] E Full diff: E + [] E - [[1, 'barry cat', 'terry dog', 'panther'], E - [2, 'terry dog', 'sara weasel', 'puma']] ``` The issue was that the version of sqlite3 built inside the Docker container was built with FTS3 and FTS4 enabled, but without the `SQLITE_ENABLE_FTS3_PARENTHESIS` compile option passed, which adds support for using `AND` and `NOT` within `match` expressions (see https://sqlite.org/fts3.html#compiling_and_enabling_fts3_and_fts4 and https://www.sqlite.org/compile.html). Without this, the `AND` used in the search in this test was being interpreted as a literal string, and so no matches were found. Adding this compile option fixes this. --- I actually ran into this issue because the same test was failing when I ran the test suite on my own machine, outside of Docker, and so I eventually tracked this down to my system sqlite3 also being compiled without this option. I wonder if this is a sign of a slightly deeper issue, that Datasette can silently behave differently based on the version and compilation of sqlite3 it is being used with. On my own system I fixed the test suite by running `pip install pysqlite3-binary`, so that this would be picked up instead of the `sqlite` package, as this seems to be compiled using this option, . Maybe using `pysqlite3-binary` could be installed/recommended by default so a more deterministic version of sqlite is used? Or there could be some feature detection done on the available sqlite version, to know what features are available and can be used/tested?",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1223/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 815955014,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTc5Njk3ODMz,1243,fix small typo,306240,closed,0,,,2,2021-02-25T00:22:34Z,2021-03-04T05:46:10Z,2021-03-04T05:46:10Z,CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/1243,,107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1243/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 818430405,MDU6SXNzdWU4MTg0MzA0MDU=,1247,datasette.add_memory_database() method,9599,closed,0,,,2,2021-03-01T03:48:38Z,2021-03-01T04:02:26Z,2021-03-01T04:02:26Z,OWNER,,"I just wrote this code: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/47eb885cc2c3aafa03645c330c6f597bee9b3b25/tests/test_facets.py#L334-L335 It would be nice if you didn't have to separately instantiate a database object here.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1247/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 817597268,MDU6SXNzdWU4MTc1OTcyNjg=,1246,Suggest for ArrayFacet possibly confused by blank values,9599,closed,0,,,3,2021-02-26T19:11:52Z,2021-03-01T03:46:11Z,2021-03-01T03:46:11Z,OWNER,,I sometimes don't get the suggestion for facet-by-array for columns that contain arrays. I think it may be because they have empty spaces in them - or perhaps it's because the null detection doesn't actually work.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1246/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 718259202,MDU6SXNzdWU3MTgyNTkyMDI=,1005,Remove xfail tests when new httpx is released,9599,closed,0,,3268330,3,2020-10-09T16:00:19Z,2021-02-28T22:41:08Z,2021-02-28T22:41:08Z,OWNER,,"> My `httpx` pull request adding `raw_path` support was just merged: https://github.com/encode/httpx/pull/1357 - but it's not in a release yet. > > I'm going to mark these tests as `xfail` so I can land this change - I'll remove that once an `httpx` release comes out that I can use to get the tests passing. > _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-706263157_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1005/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 814591962,MDU6SXNzdWU4MTQ1OTE5NjI=,1240,Allow facetting on custom queries,7107523,closed,0,,,3,2021-02-23T15:52:19Z,2021-02-26T18:19:46Z,2021-02-26T18:18:18Z,NONE,,"Facets are a tremendously useful feature, especially for people peeking at the database for the first time and still having little knowledge about the details of the data. It is of great assistance to discover interesting features to explore futher in advanced queries. Yet, it seems it's impossible to use facets when running a custom SQL query, be it from the little gear icons in column names, the facet suggestions at the top (hidden when performing a custom query), or by appending a facet code to the URL. Is there a technical limitation, or is this something that could be unlocked easily?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1240/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 817528452,MDU6SXNzdWU4MTc1Mjg0NTI=,1244,Plugin tip: look at the examples linked from the hooks page,9599,closed,0,,,1,2021-02-26T17:18:27Z,2021-02-26T17:30:38Z,2021-02-26T17:27:15Z,OWNER,,"Someone asked ""what are good example plugins I can look at?"" and I realized that the answer is to look through the example links on https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html - but that tip should be written down somewhere on the https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/writing_plugins.html page.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1244/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 813978858,MDU6SXNzdWU4MTM5Nzg4NTg=,1239,JSON filter fails if column contains spaces,9599,closed,0,,,1,2021-02-23T00:18:07Z,2021-02-23T00:22:53Z,2021-02-23T00:22:53Z,OWNER,,"Got this exception: `ERROR: conn=, sql = 'select Address, Affiliation, County, [Has Report], [Latest report notes], [Latest report yes], Latitude, [Location Type], Longitude, Name, id, [Appointment scheduling instructions], [Availability Info], [Latest report] from locations where rowid in (\n select locations.rowid from locations, json_each(locations.Availability Info) j\n where j.value = :p0\n ) and ""Latest report yes"" = :p1 order by id limit 101', params = {'p0': 'Yes: appointment required', 'p1': '1'}: near ""Info"": syntax error`",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1239/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 797651831,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTc2NTE4MzE=,1212,Tests are very slow. ,4488943,closed,0,,,4,2021-01-31T08:06:16Z,2021-02-19T22:54:13Z,2021-02-19T22:54:13Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,"Working on my PR i noticed that tests are very slow. The plain pytest run took about 37 minutes for me. However i could shave of about 10 minutes from that if i used pytest-xdist to parallelize execution. `pytest -n 8` is run only in 28 minutes on my machine. I can create a PR to mention that in your documentation. This will be a simple change to add pytest-xdist to requirements and change a command to run pytest in documentation. Does that make sense to you? After a bit more investigation it looks like python-xdist is not an answer. It creates a race condition for tests that try to clead temp dir before run. Profiling shows that most time is spent on conn.executescript(TABLES) in make_app_client function. Which makes sense. Perhaps the better approach would be look at the app_client fixture which is already session scoped, but not used by all test cases. And/or use conn = sqlite3.connect("":memory:"") which is much faster. And/or truncate tables after each TC instead of deleting the file and re-creating them. I can take a look which is the best approach if you give the go-ahead. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1212/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 811589344,MDU6SXNzdWU4MTE1ODkzNDQ=,1235,Upgrade Python version used by official Datasette Docker image,9599,closed,0,,,2,2021-02-19T00:47:40Z,2021-02-19T01:48:31Z,2021-02-19T01:48:30Z,OWNER,,"Currently uses 3.7.2: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/73bed175631a79e13a521eee82f8451dd0477eb3/Dockerfile#L1 There's a security fix for Python which it would be good to ship in this image (even though I'm reasonably confident it doesn't affect Datasette): https://bugs.python.org/issue42938",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1235/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 811407131,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTc1OTQwMTkz,1232,--crossdb option for joining across databases,9599,closed,0,,,8,2021-02-18T19:48:50Z,2021-02-18T22:09:13Z,2021-02-18T22:09:12Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1232,"Refs #283. Still needs: - [x] Unit test for --crossdb queries - [x] Show warning on console if it truncates at ten databases (or on web interface) - [x] Show connected databases on the `/_memory` database page - [x] Documentation - [x] https://latest.datasette.io/ demo should demonstrate this feature",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1232/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 808843401,MDU6SXNzdWU4MDg4NDM0MDE=,1226,--port option should validate port is between 0 and 65535,9599,closed,0,,,4,2021-02-15T22:01:33Z,2021-02-18T18:41:27Z,2021-02-18T18:41:27Z,OWNER,,"Currently throws an ugly error message: ``` (datasette-graphql) datasette-graphql % datasette fivethirtyeight.db -p 80094 INFO: Started server process [45497] INFO: Waiting for application startup. INFO: Application startup complete. Traceback (most recent call last): File ""/Users/simon/.local/share/virtualenvs/datasette-graphql-n1OSJCS8/bin/datasette"", line 8, in sys.exit(cli()) ... server = await loop.create_server( File ""/Users/simon/.pyenv/versions/3.8.2/lib/python3.8/asyncio/base_events.py"", line 1461, in create_server sock.bind(sa) OverflowError: bind(): port must be 0-65535. ```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1226/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 806743116,MDU6SXNzdWU4MDY3NDMxMTY=,1220,Installing datasette via docker: Path 'fixtures.db' does not exist,30607,closed,0,,,4,2021-02-11T21:09:14Z,2021-02-12T21:35:17Z,2021-02-12T21:35:17Z,NONE,,"Hi, If I run ``` docker run -p 8001:8001 -v `pwd`:/mnt \ 1 ↵ datasetteproject/datasette \ datasette -p 8001 -h 0.0.0.0 fixtures.db ``` I have ``` Error: Invalid value for '[FILES]...': Path 'fixtures.db' does not exist. ``` If I run `test -f fixtures.db && echo ""it exists.""` I have `it exists.`. What's my error? Thank you",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1220/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 806861312,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTcyMjA5MjQz,1222,"--ssl-keyfile and --ssl-certfile, refs #1221",9599,closed,0,,,0,2021-02-12T00:45:58Z,2021-02-12T00:52:18Z,2021-02-12T00:52:17Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1222,,107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1222/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 796234313,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTYyMzQzMTM=,1210,Immutable Database w/ Canned Queries,525780,closed,0,,,2,2021-01-28T18:08:29Z,2021-02-05T11:30:34Z,2021-02-05T11:30:34Z,NONE,,"I have a database that I only want to read from; when instructing datasette to treat the database as immutable my defined canned queries disappear. Are these two features incompatible or have I hit an unintended bug? Thanks for datasette in any way, it's a joy to use!",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1210/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 799693777,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTk2OTM3Nzc=,1214,Re-submitting filter form duplicates _x querystring arguments,9599,closed,0,,,3,2021-02-02T21:13:35Z,2021-02-02T21:28:53Z,2021-02-02T21:21:13Z,OWNER,,"Really nasty bug, caused by #1194 fix in 07e163561592c743e4117f72102fcd350a600909 Navigate to this page: https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/labels?_search=help&_sort=id Click ""Apply"" to submit the form and the resulting URL is https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/labels?_search=help&_sort=id&_search=help&_sort=id That's because the (truncated) HTML for the form looks like this: ```html ... ...
... ```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1214/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 793881756,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTM4ODE3NTY=,1207,"Document the Datasette(..., pdb=True) testing pattern",9599,closed,0,,,1,2021-01-26T02:48:10Z,2021-01-29T02:37:19Z,2021-01-29T02:12:34Z,OWNER,,"If you're writing tests for a Datasette plugin and you get a 500 error from inside Datasette, you can cause Datasette to open a PDB session within the application server code by doing this: ```python ds = Datasette([db_path], pdb=True) response = await ds.client.get(""/"") ``` You'll need to run `pytest -s` to interact with the debugger, otherwise you'll get an error.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1207/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 793027837,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTMwMjc4Mzc=,1205,Rename /:memory: to /_memory,9599,closed,0,,3268330,3,2021-01-25T05:04:56Z,2021-01-28T22:55:02Z,2021-01-28T22:51:42Z,OWNER,,"For consistency with `/_internal` - and because then we don't need to escape the `:` characters. This change would need to be in before Datasette 1.0. I could land it earlier and set up redirects from the old URLs though.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1205/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 770448622,MDU6SXNzdWU3NzA0NDg2MjI=,1151,Database class mechanism for cross-connection in-memory databases,9599,closed,0,,6346396,11,2020-12-17T23:25:43Z,2021-01-26T19:07:44Z,2020-12-18T01:01:26Z,OWNER,,"> Next challenge: figure out how to use the `Database` class from https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.53/datasette/database.py for an in-memory database which persists data for the duration of the lifetime of the server, and allows access to that in-memory database from multiple threads in a way that lets them see each other's changes. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1150#issuecomment-747768112_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1151/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 792904595,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTI5MDQ1OTU=,1201,Release notes for Datasette 0.54,9599,closed,0,,6346396,5,2021-01-24T21:22:28Z,2021-01-25T17:42:21Z,2021-01-25T17:42:21Z,OWNER,,"These will incorporate the release notes from the alpha, much expanded: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.54a0",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1201/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 793086333,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTYwODMxNjM4,1206,Release 0.54,9599,closed,0,,,3,2021-01-25T06:45:47Z,2021-01-25T17:33:30Z,2021-01-25T17:33:29Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1206,Refs #1201,107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1206/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 788447787,MDU6SXNzdWU3ODg0NDc3ODc=,1194,?_size= argument is not persisted by hidden form fields in the table filters,9599,closed,0,,6346396,3,2021-01-18T17:41:52Z,2021-01-25T03:10:23Z,2021-01-25T03:10:23Z,OWNER,,"Click ""Apply"" on https://covid-19.datasettes.com/covid/ny_times_us_counties?_size=1000&county__exact=San+Francisco&state__exact=California&_sort_desc=date#g.mark=line&g.x_column=date&g.x_type=temporal&g.y_column=cases&g.y_type=quantitative and the `?_size=1000` parameter from the URL will no longer apply on the reloaded page.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1194/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 777145954,MDU6SXNzdWU3NzcxNDU5NTQ=,1167,Add Prettier to contributing documentation,9599,closed,0,,6346396,3,2020-12-31T22:00:55Z,2021-01-25T02:01:19Z,2021-01-25T01:58:28Z,OWNER,,"Following #1166 - the docs at https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/contributing.html should include a section about JavaScript, and it should document how to run Prettier. I run it in VS Code but it can be run on the command-line too: npx prettier 'datasette/static/*[!.min].js' --write ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1167/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 792958773,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTYwNzI1NzE0,1203,Easier way to run Prettier locally,9599,closed,0,,,0,2021-01-25T01:39:06Z,2021-01-25T01:41:46Z,2021-01-25T01:41:46Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1203,Refs #1167,107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1203/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 771208009,MDU6SXNzdWU3NzEyMDgwMDk=,1154,Documentation for new _internal database and tables,9599,closed,0,,6346396,2,2020-12-18T22:34:52Z,2021-01-25T00:09:22Z,2021-01-25T00:08:41Z,OWNER,,"> Needs documentation, but I can wait to write that until I've tested out the feature a bit more. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1150#issuecomment-748352106_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1154/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 792931244,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTI5MzEyNDQ=,1202,Documentation convention for marking unstable APIs.,9599,closed,0,,6346396,2,2021-01-24T23:47:18Z,2021-01-25T00:01:02Z,2021-01-25T00:01:02Z,OWNER,,"> I'm going to document this but mark it as unstable, using a new documentation convention for marking unstable APIs. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1154#issuecomment-766462197_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1202/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 785588942,MDU6SXNzdWU3ODU1ODg5NDI=,1187,"extra_body_script() support for script type=""module""",9599,closed,0,,6346396,1,2021-01-14T02:01:47Z,2021-01-24T21:21:44Z,2021-01-14T02:14:39Z,OWNER,,"Follows #1186. The `extra_body_script()` plugin hook should provide a mechanism for specifying that the script should use `