id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1083726550,I_kwDOBm6k_c5AmFrW,1568,Trace should show queries on the write connection too,9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-12-18T02:34:12Z,2022-01-13T22:27:23Z,2021-12-18T02:42:34Z,OWNER,,"> Here's why - `trace` only applies to read, not write SQL operations: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7c8f8aa209e4ba7bf83976f8495d67c28fbfca24/datasette/database.py#L209-L211 _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997128508_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1568/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 776635426,MDU6SXNzdWU3NzY2MzU0MjY=,1165,Mechanism for executing JavaScript unit tests,9599,open,0,,,9,2020-12-30T21:02:34Z,2022-01-13T22:21:29Z,,OWNER,,"> I'm going to need to add JavaScript unit tests for this new plugin system. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752757289_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1165/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1083895395,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Amu5j,1569,"db.execute_write(..., executescript=True) parameter",9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-12-18T18:20:47Z,2022-01-13T22:27:27Z,2021-12-18T18:34:18Z,OWNER,,"> Idea: teach `execute_write` to accept an optional `executescript=True` parameter, like this: ```diff diff --git a/datasette/database.py b/datasette/database.py index 468e936..1a424f5 100644 --- a/datasette/database.py +++ b/datasette/database.py @@ -94,10 +94,14 @@ class Database: f""file:{self.path}{qs}"", uri=True, check_same_thread=False ) - async def execute_write(self, sql, params=None, block=False): + async def execute_write(self, sql, params=None, executescript=False, block=False): + assert not executescript and params, ""Cannot use params with executescript=True"" def _inner(conn): with conn: - return conn.execute(sql, params or []) + if executescript: + return conn.executescript(sql) + else: + return conn.execute(sql, params or []) with trace(""sql"", database=self.name, sql=sql.strip(), params=params): results = await self.execute_write_fn(_inner, block=block) ``` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997248364_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1569/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 776634318,MDU6SXNzdWU3NzY2MzQzMTg=,1164,Mechanism for minifying JavaScript that ships with Datasette,9599,open,0,,,9,2020-12-30T20:59:06Z,2022-01-13T22:21:29Z,,OWNER,,"> If I'm going to minify it I'll need to figure out a build step in Datasette itself so that I can easily work on that minified version. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752748496_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1164/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1083921371,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Am1Pb,1570,Separate db.execute_write() into three methods,9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-12-18T18:45:54Z,2022-01-13T22:27:38Z,2021-12-18T18:57:25Z,OWNER,,"> Rather than adding a `executemany=True` parameter, I'm now thinking a better design might be to have three methods: > > - `db.execute_write(sql, params=None, block=False)` > - `db.execute_write_script(sql, block=False)` > - `db.execute_write_many(sql, params_seq, block=False)` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997267416_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1570/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1081318247,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ac5tn,1556,"Show count of facet values always, not just for `?_facet_size=max`",9599,closed,0,,7571612,1,2021-12-15T17:49:01Z,2022-01-13T22:26:07Z,2021-12-15T17:58:06Z,OWNER,,"> You've caused me to rethink this feature - I no longer think there's value in only showing these numbers if `?_facet_size=max` as opposed to all of the time. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1423#issuecomment-995023410_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1556/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 1, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 534629631,MDU6SXNzdWU1MzQ2Mjk2MzE=,650,Add a glossary to the documentation,9599,open,0,,,3,2019-12-09T00:23:45Z,2022-01-13T22:04:56Z,,OWNER,,"Call it `glossary.rst` - it can use a definition list something like this: ```rst .. _glossary: Glossary ======== Term A definition of the term. Another term Another definition. ```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/650/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 681334912,MDU6SXNzdWU2ODEzMzQ5MTI=,942,Support column descriptions in metadata.json,9599,closed,0,,,18,2020-08-18T20:52:00Z,2022-01-13T22:21:42Z,2021-08-12T23:53:24Z,OWNER,,"Could look something like this: ```json { ""title"": ""Five Thirty Eight"", ""license"": ""CC Attribution 4.0 License"", ""license_url"": ""https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"", ""source"": ""fivethirtyeight/data on GitHub"", ""source_url"": ""https://github.com/fivethirtyeight/data"", ""databases"": { ""fivethirtyeight"": { ""tables"": { ""mueller-polls/mueller-approval-polls"": { ""description_html"": ""
....
"", ""columns"": { ""name_of_column"": ""column_description goes here"" } ```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/942/reactions"", ""total_count"": 4, ""+1"": 4, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 895686039,MDU6SXNzdWU4OTU2ODYwMzk=,1336,Document turning on WAL for live served SQLite databases,9599,open,0,,,1,2021-05-19T17:08:58Z,2022-01-13T21:55:59Z,,OWNER,,"Datasette docs don't talk about WAL yet, which allows you to safely serve reads from a database file while it is accepting writes.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1336/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1087931918,I_kwDOBm6k_c5A2IYO,1579,`.execute_write(... block=True)` should be the default behaviour,9599,closed,0,,7571612,7,2021-12-23T18:54:28Z,2022-01-13T22:28:08Z,2021-12-23T19:18:26Z,OWNER,,"Every single piece of code I've written against the write APIs has used the `block=True` option to wait for the result. Without that, it instead fires the write into the queue but then continues even before it has finished executing. `block=True` should clearly be the default behaviour here!",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1579/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1082564912,I_kwDOBm6k_c5AhqEw,1557,`?_nosuggest=1` parameter for disabling facet suggestions on table view,9599,closed,0,,7571612,1,2021-12-16T19:21:42Z,2022-01-13T22:26:48Z,2021-12-16T19:24:59Z,OWNER,,"Found I wanted this while I was debugging #625 just to clean up the debug traces, but it makes sense as a partner to `?_nofacet=1` and `?_nocount=1` from #1350 and #1353.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1557/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1083718998,I_kwDOBm6k_c5AmD1W,1567,Remove undocumented sqlite_functions mechanism,9599,closed,0,,7571612,0,2021-12-18T01:51:10Z,2022-01-13T22:27:04Z,2021-12-18T01:54:46Z,OWNER,,"I added this in 0b8c1b0a6da9cb8ac0d28cc90dd783de87554036 but it's never been documented and the same thing can now be achieved using the `prepare_connection` plugin hook. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0c91e59d2bbfc08884cfcf5d1b902a2f4968b7ff/datasette/app.py#L262 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0c91e59d2bbfc08884cfcf5d1b902a2f4968b7ff/datasette/app.py#L551-L552 It's used here in the tests: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/69244a617b1118dcbd04a8f102173f04680cf08c/tests/fixtures.py#L156",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1567/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1102568047,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Bt9pv,1596,Documentation page warning of changes coming in 1.0,9599,open,0,,,0,2022-01-13T23:26:04Z,2022-01-13T23:26:04Z,,OWNER,,I should start this relatively soon.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1596/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1067771698,I_kwDOCGYnMM4_pOcy,348,Command for creating an empty database,9599,closed,0,,7558727,6,2021-11-30T23:24:27Z,2022-01-13T07:06:59Z,2022-01-09T20:33:20Z,OWNER,,"I sometimes find the need to create an empty SQLite database file - for example if I want to enable WAL on it before using it with another script. I currently do that like this: sqlite3 my.db vacuum sqlite-utils enable-wal my.db It would be nice if `sqlite-utils` had a convenience command for doing this.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/348/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 642651572,MDU6SXNzdWU2NDI2NTE1NzI=,860,Plugin hook for instance/database/table metadata,9599,closed,0,,,10,2020-06-21T22:20:25Z,2022-01-13T22:21:42Z,2021-06-26T22:56:28Z,OWNER,,"I'm not happy with how `metadata.(json|yaml)` keeps growing new features. Rather than having a single plugin hook for all of `metadata.json` I'm going to split out the feature that shows actual real metadata for tables and databases - `source`, `license` etc - into its own plugin-powered mechanism. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/357#issuecomment-647189045_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/860/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1082746149,I_kwDOBm6k_c5AiWUl,1560,"Table page title has ""where where"" in it",9599,closed,0,,7571612,0,2021-12-17T00:05:48Z,2022-01-13T22:28:35Z,2022-01-13T22:20:15Z,OWNER,,"Just noticed this while working on #1518. ``` % curl -s 'https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_sort=pk&on_earth__exact=1' | grep -C 1 '