html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1713#issuecomment-1103312860,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1713,1103312860,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Bwzfc,536941,2022-04-20T00:52:19Z,2022-04-20T00:52:19Z,CONTRIBUTOR,feels related to #1402 ,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1203943272,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1549#issuecomment-1087428593,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1549,1087428593,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5A0Nfx,536941,2022-04-04T11:17:13Z,2022-04-04T11:17:13Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"another way to get the behavior of downloading the file is to use the download attribute of the anchor tag

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/a#attr-download","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1077620955,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1684#issuecomment-1078126065,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1684,1078126065,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5AQuXx,536941,2022-03-24T20:08:56Z,2022-03-24T20:13:19Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"would be nice if the behavior was

1. try to facet all the columns
2. for bigger tables try to facet the indexed columns
3. for the biggest tables, turn off autofacetting completely

This is based on my assumption that what determines autofaceting is the rarity of unique values. Which may not be true!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1179998071,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1581#issuecomment-1077047295,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1581,1077047295,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5AMm__,536941,2022-03-24T04:08:18Z,2022-03-24T04:08:18Z,CONTRIBUTOR,this has been addressed by the datasette-hashed-urls plugin,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1089529555,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1582#issuecomment-1077047152,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1582,1077047152,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5AMm9w,536941,2022-03-24T04:07:58Z,2022-03-24T04:07:58Z,CONTRIBUTOR,this has been obviated by the datasette-hashed-urls plugin,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1090055810,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1655#issuecomment-1062450649,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1655,1062450649,IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_U7XZ,536941,2022-03-09T01:10:46Z,2022-03-09T01:10:46Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"i increased the max_returned_row, because I have some scripts that get CSVs from this site, and this makes doing pagination of CSVs less annoying for many cases. i know that's streaming csvs is something you are hoping to address in 1.0. let me know if there's anything i can do to help with that.

as for what if anything can be done about the size of the dom, I don't have any ideas right now, but i'll poke around.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1163369515,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1641#issuecomment-1049879118,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1641,1049879118,IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-k-JO,536941,2022-02-24T13:49:26Z,2022-02-24T13:49:26Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"maybe worth considering adding buttons for paren, asterisk, etc. under the input text box on mobile?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1149310456,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/403#issuecomment-1033332570,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/403,1033332570,IC_kwDOCGYnMM49l2da,536941,2022-02-09T04:22:43Z,2022-02-09T04:22:43Z,CONTRIBUTOR,dddoooope,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1126692066,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/403#issuecomment-1032126353,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/403,1032126353,IC_kwDOCGYnMM49hP-R,536941,2022-02-08T01:45:15Z,2022-02-08T01:45:31Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"you can hack something like this to achieve this result:

`sqlite-utils convert my_database my_table rowid ""{'id': value}"" --multi`","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1126692066,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26#issuecomment-1032120014,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26,1032120014,IC_kwDOCGYnMM49hObO,536941,2022-02-08T01:32:34Z,2022-02-08T01:32:34Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"if you are curious about prior art, https://github.com/jsnell/json-to-multicsv is really good!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",455486286,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1009548580,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1009548580,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48LH0k,536941,2022-01-11T02:43:34Z,2022-01-11T02:43:34Z,CONTRIBUTOR,thanks so much! always a pleasure to see how you work through these things,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008275546,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008275546,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48GRBa,536941,2022-01-09T11:01:15Z,2022-01-09T13:37:51Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"i don’t want to be such a partisan for analyze, but the query planner deciding *not* to use an index based on information collected by analyze is not necessarily a bug, but could be the correct choice.

<s>the original poster in that stack overflow doesn’t say there’s a performance regression </s>","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008166084,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008166084,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F2TE,536941,2022-01-08T22:32:47Z,2022-01-08T22:32:47Z,CONTRIBUTOR,or using “ pragma optimize”,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008164786,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008164786,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F1-y,536941,2022-01-08T22:24:19Z,2022-01-08T22:24:19Z,CONTRIBUTOR,the out-of-date scenario you describe could be addressed by automatically adding an analyze to the insert or convert commands if they implicate an index,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008164116,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008164116,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F10U,536941,2022-01-08T22:18:57Z,2022-01-08T22:18:57Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"the table with the query ran so bad was about 50k. 

i think the scenario should not be worse than no stats. 

i also did not know that sqlite was so different from postgres and needed an explicit analyze call.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008161965,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008161965,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F1St,536941,2022-01-08T22:02:56Z,2022-01-08T22:02:56Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"for options 2 and 3, i would worry about discoverablity. 

in other db’s it is not necessary to explicitly call analyze for most indices. ie for postgres

> The system regularly collects statistics on all of a table's columns. Newly-created non-expression indexes can immediately use these statistics to determine an index's usefulness.

i suppose i would propose raising a warning if the stats table is created that explains what is going on and informs users about a —no-analyze argument.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1574#issuecomment-1007844190,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1574,1007844190,IC_kwDOBm6k_c48Ente,536941,2022-01-08T00:42:12Z,2022-01-08T00:42:12Z,CONTRIBUTOR,is there a reason to not always use the slim option?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1084193403,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1007636709,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1007636709,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48D1Dl,536941,2022-01-07T18:28:33Z,2022-01-07T18:29:43Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"i added an index to one table with sqlite-utils, and then a query that used to take about 1 second started taking hundreds of seconds. 

running analyze got me back to sub second speed.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1583#issuecomment-1002825217,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1583,1002825217,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47xeYB,536941,2021-12-30T00:34:16Z,2021-12-30T00:34:16Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"if that is not desirable, it might be good to document that users might want to set up a lifecycle rule to automatically delete these build artifacts. something like https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59937542/can-i-delete-container-images-from-google-cloud-storage-artifacts-bucket","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1090810196,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1561#issuecomment-997128712,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1561,997128712,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvoI,536941,2021-12-18T02:35:48Z,2021-12-18T02:35:48Z,CONTRIBUTOR,interesting! i love this feature. this + full caching with cloudflare is really super!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1082765654,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-993078038,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526,993078038,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47MSsW,536941,2021-12-14T01:46:52Z,2021-12-14T01:46:52Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"the nested query idea is very nice, and i stole if for [my client side paginator](https://observablehq.com/d/1d5da3a3c3f2f347#DatasetteClient). However,  it won't do the right thing if the original query orders by random().

If you go the nested query route, maybe raise a 4XX status code if the query has such a clause?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",459882902,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1553#issuecomment-993014772,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1553,993014772,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47MDP0,536941,2021-12-13T23:46:18Z,2021-12-13T23:46:18Z,CONTRIBUTOR,these headers would also be relevant for json exports of custom queries,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079111498,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1553#issuecomment-992986587,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1553,992986587,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47L8Xb,536941,2021-12-13T22:57:04Z,2021-12-13T22:57:04Z,CONTRIBUTOR,would also be good if the header said the what the max row limit was,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079111498,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-992971072,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526,992971072,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47L4lA,536941,2021-12-13T22:29:34Z,2021-12-13T22:29:34Z,CONTRIBUTOR,just came by to open this issue. would make my data analysis in observable a lot better!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",459882902,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1549#issuecomment-991754237,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1549,991754237,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47HPf9,536941,2021-12-11T19:14:39Z,2021-12-11T19:14:39Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"that option is not available on [custom queries](https://labordata.bunkum.us/odpr-962a140?sql=with+local_union_filings+as+%28%0D%0A++select+*+from+lm_data+%0D%0A++where%0D%0A++++yr_covered+%3E+cast%28strftime%28%27%25Y%27%2C+%27now%27%2C+%27-5+years%27%29+as+int%29%0D%0A++++and+desig_name+%3D+%27LU%27%0D%0A++order+by+yr_covered+desc%0D%0A%29%2C%0D%0Amost_recent_filing+as+%28%0D%0A++select%0D%0A++++*%0D%0A++from+local_union_filings%0D%0A++group+by%0D%0A++++f_num%0D%0A%29%0D%0Aselect%0D%0A++*%0D%0Afrom%0D%0A++most_recent_filing%0D%0Awhere%0D%0A++next_election+%3E%3D+strftime%28%27%25Y-%25m%27%2C+%27now%27%29%0D%0A++and+next_election+%3C+strftime%28%27%25Y-%25m%27%2C+%27now%27%2C+%27%2B1+year%27%29%0D%0Aorder+by%0D%0A++members+desc%3B).

","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1077620955,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353#issuecomment-991405755,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353,991405755,IC_kwDOCGYnMM47F6a7,536941,2021-12-11T01:38:29Z,2021-12-11T01:38:29Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"wow! that's awesome! thanks so much, @simonw!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1077102934,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26#issuecomment-964205475,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26,964205475,IC_kwDOCGYnMM45eJuj,536941,2021-11-09T14:31:29Z,2021-11-09T14:31:29Z,CONTRIBUTOR,i was just reaching for a tool to do this this morning,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",455486286,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1495#issuecomment-954384496,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1495,954384496,IC_kwDOBm6k_c444sBw,536941,2021-10-29T03:07:13Z,2021-10-29T03:07:13Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"okay @simonw, made the requested changes. tests are running locally. i think this is ready for you to look at again.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1033678984,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1284#issuecomment-949604763,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1284,949604763,IC_kwDOBm6k_c44mdGb,536941,2021-10-22T12:54:34Z,2021-10-22T12:54:34Z,CONTRIBUTOR,i'm going to take a swing at this today. we'll see.,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",845794436,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1419#issuecomment-893114612,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1419,893114612,IC_kwDOBm6k_c41O9j0,536941,2021-08-05T02:29:06Z,2021-08-05T02:29:06Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"there's a lot of complexity here, that's probably not worth addressing. i got what i needed by patching the dockerfile that cloudrun uses to install a newer version of sqlite.

","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",959710008,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1419#issuecomment-892276385,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1419,892276385,IC_kwDOBm6k_c41Lw6h,536941,2021-08-04T00:58:49Z,2021-08-04T00:58:49Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"yes, [filter clause on aggregate queries were added to sqlite3 in 3.30](https://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_30_1.html)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",959710008,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1401#issuecomment-884910320,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1401,884910320,IC_kwDOBm6k_c40vqjw,536941,2021-07-22T13:26:01Z,2021-07-22T13:26:01Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"ordered lists didn't work either, btw","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",950664971,