html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752882797,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,752882797,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjg4Mjc5Nw==,154364,2020-12-31T08:07:59Z,2020-12-31T15:04:32Z,NONE,"If you're using arrow functions, you can presumably use default parameters, not much difference in support. That would save you 9 bytes. But OTOH you need `""use strict"";` to use arrow functions etc, and that's 13 bytes. Your latest 250-byte one, with use strict, gzips to 199 bytes. The following might be 292 bytes, but compresses to 204, basically the same, and works in any browser (well, IE9+) at all: `var datasette=datasette||{};datasette.plugins=function(){var d={};return{register:function(b,c,e){d[b]||(d[b]=[]);d[b].push([c,e])},call:function(b,c){c=c||{};var e=[];(d[b]||[]).forEach(function(a){a=a[0].apply(a[0],a[1].map(function(a){return c[a]}));void 0!==a&&e.push(a)});return e}}}();` Source for that is below; I replaced the [fn,parameters] because closure-compiler includes a polyfill for that, and I ran `closure-compiler --language_out ECMASCRIPT3`: ```js var datasette = datasette || {}; datasette.plugins = (() => { var registry = {}; return { register: (hook, fn, parameters) => { if (!registry[hook]) { registry[hook] = []; } registry[hook].push([fn, parameters]); }, call: (hook, args) => { args = args || {}; var results = []; (registry[hook] || []).forEach((data) => { /* Call with the correct arguments */ var result = data[0].apply(data[0], data[1].map(parameter => args[parameter])); if (result !== undefined) { results.push(result); } }); return results; } }; })(); ```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752888552,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,752888552,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjg4ODU1Mg==,154364,2020-12-31T08:33:11Z,2020-12-31T08:34:27Z,NONE,"If you could say that all hook functions had to accept one options parameter (and could use object destructuring if they wished to only see a subset), you could have this, which minifies (to all-browser-JS) to 200 bytes, gzips to 146, and works practically the same: ```js var datasette = datasette || {}; datasette.plugins = (() => { var registry = {}; return { register: (hook, fn) => { registry[hook] = registry[hook] || []; registry[hook].push(fn); }, call: (hook, args) => { var results = (registry[hook] || []).map(fn => fn(args||{})); return results; } }; })(); ``` `var datasette=datasette||{};datasette.plugins=function(){var b={};return{register:function(a,c){b[a]=b[a]||[];b[a].push(c)},call:function(a,c){return(b[a]||[]).map(function(a){return a(c||{})})}}}();` Called the same, definitions tiny bit different: ```js datasette.plugins.register('numbers', ({a, b}) => a + b) datasette.plugins.register('numbers', o => o.a * o.b) datasette.plugins.call('numbers', {a: 4, b: 6}) ```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753215545,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,753215545,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxNTU0NQ==,9599,2020-12-31T22:05:41Z,2020-12-31T22:05:41Z,OWNER,Using object destructuring like that is a great idea. I'm going to play with your version - it's delightfully succinct.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753215761,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,753215761,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxNTc2MQ==,9599,2020-12-31T22:07:31Z,2020-12-31T22:07:31Z,OWNER,"I think I need to keep the mechanism whereby a plugin can return `undefined` in order to indicate that it has nothing to say for that specific item - that's borrowed from Pluggy and I've used it a bunch in my Python plugins. That makes the code a bit longer. I'll write some example plugins to help me decide if the filtering-out-of-undefined mechanism is needed or not.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753217714,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,753217714,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxNzcxNA==,9599,2020-12-31T22:21:33Z,2020-12-31T22:21:33Z,OWNER,"Eventually I'd like to provide a whole bunch of other `datasette.X` utility functions that plugins can use - things like `datasette.addTabbedContentPane()` or similar. But I don't want to inline those into the page. So... I think the basic plugin system remains inline - maybe from an inlined file called `plugins-bootstrap.js`. Then a separate `plugins.js` contains the rest of the API functionality. If a plugin wants to take advantage of those APIs, maybe it registers itself using `datasette.plugins.register('load', () => ...)` - that `load` hook can then be fired once the bulkier plugin code has been loaded.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753217917,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,753217917,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxNzkxNw==,9599,2020-12-31T22:23:29Z,2020-12-31T22:23:36Z,OWNER,"If I'm going to do that, it would be good if subsequent plugins that register against the `load` event are executed straight away. That's a bit of a weird edge-case in plugin world - it would involve the bulkier code that gets loaded redefining how `datasette.plugins.register` works to special-case the `'load'` hook. Maybe the tiny bootstrap code could define a `datasette.plugins.onload(callbackFunction)` method which gets upgraded later into something that fires straight away? Would add more bytes though.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753218817,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,753218817,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxODgxNw==,173848,2020-12-31T22:32:25Z,2020-12-31T22:32:25Z,NONE,"Amazing work! And you've put in far more work than I'd expect to reduce the payload (which is admirable). So, to add a plugin with the current design, it goes in (a) the template or (b) a bookmarklet, right?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753219407,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,753219407,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxOTQwNw==,9599,2020-12-31T22:38:45Z,2020-12-31T22:39:10Z,OWNER,"You'll be able to add JavaScript plugins using a bunch of different mechanisms: - In a custom template, dropping the code in to a `