id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
1822934563,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp8Yj,2109,Plan for getting the new JSON format query views working,9599,closed,0,,9700784,5,2023-07-26T18:20:18Z,2023-07-27T00:24:47Z,2023-07-26T18:25:34Z,OWNER,,"I've been stuck on this for too long. I'm breaking it down into a full milestone:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/milestone/29",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2109/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1822936521,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp83J,2110,Merge database index page and query view,9599,closed,0,,9700784,1,2023-07-26T18:21:57Z,2023-07-26T19:53:25Z,2023-07-26T19:53:25Z,OWNER,,"Refs:
- #2109

The idea here is that hitting `/content` without a `?sql=` will show an empty result set AND default to including a bunch of extras about the list of tables in the database.

Then I won't have to think about `/content` and `/content?sql=` as separate pages any more.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2110/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1822937426,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp9FS,2111,Implement new /content.json?sql=...,9599,closed,0,,9700784,4,2023-07-26T18:22:39Z,2023-08-08T02:00:37Z,2023-08-08T02:00:22Z,OWNER,,"This will be the base that the remaining work builds on top of. Refs:
- #2109 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2111/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1822938661,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp9Yl,2112,Build HTML version of /content?sql=...,9599,closed,0,,9700784,5,2023-07-26T18:23:34Z,2023-08-08T02:01:09Z,2023-08-08T02:01:01Z,OWNER,,"This will help make the hook as robust as possible.
- #2109 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2112/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1822940263,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp9xn,2114,Implement canned queries against new query JSON work,9599,closed,0,,9700784,3,2023-07-26T18:24:50Z,2023-08-09T15:26:58Z,2023-08-09T15:26:57Z,OWNER,,- #2109 ,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2114/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1822940964,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp98k,2115,Ensure all tests pass against new query view JSON,9599,closed,0,,9700784,0,2023-07-26T18:25:20Z,2023-08-08T02:01:39Z,2023-08-08T02:01:38Z,OWNER,,- #2109 ,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2115/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1822949756,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sqAF8,2116,Turn DatabaseDownload into an async view function,9599,closed,0,,9700784,3,2023-07-26T18:31:59Z,2023-07-26T18:44:00Z,2023-07-26T18:44:00Z,OWNER,,"A minor refactor, but it is a good starting point for this new branch. Refs:
- #2109",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2116/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1822982933,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sqIMV,2117,Figure out what to do about `DatabaseView.name`,9599,closed,0,,9700784,1,2023-07-26T18:58:06Z,2023-08-08T02:02:07Z,2023-08-08T02:02:07Z,OWNER,,"In the old code:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/08181823990a71ffa5a1b57b37259198eaa43e06/datasette/views/database.py#L34-L35

This `name` class attribute was later used by some of the plugin hooks, passed as `view_name`: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/18dd88ee4d78fe9d760e9da96028ae06d938a85c/datasette/hookspecs.py#L50-L54

Figure out how that should work once I've refactored those classes to view functions instead.

Refs:
- #2109 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2117/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1823352380,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5Wfgd9,2118,New JSON design for query views,9599,closed,0,,9700784,11,2023-07-26T23:29:21Z,2023-08-08T01:47:40Z,2023-08-08T01:47:39Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/2118,"WIP. Refs:
- #2109 

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette start -->
----
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--2118.org.readthedocs.build/en/2118/

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette end -->",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2118/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
1840329615,I_kwDOBm6k_c5tsTOP,2130,Render plugin mechanism needs `error` and `truncated` fields,9599,closed,0,,9700784,2,2023-08-07T23:19:19Z,2023-08-08T01:51:54Z,2023-08-08T01:47:42Z,OWNER,,"While working on:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2118

It became clear that the `render` callback function documented here: https://docs.datasette.io/en/0.64.3/plugin_hooks.html#register-output-renderer-datasette

Needs to grow the ability to be told if an error occurred (an `error` string) and if the results were truncated (a `truncated` boolean).",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2130/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1841343173,I_kwDOBm6k_c5twKrF,2132,Get form fields on query page working again ,9599,closed,0,,9700784,1,2023-08-08T13:39:05Z,2023-08-08T13:45:10Z,2023-08-08T13:45:09Z,OWNER,,"Caused by:
- #2112

https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select+pk1%2C+pk2%2C+pk3%2C+content+from+compound_three_primary_keys+where+%22pk1%22+%3D+%3Ap0+order+by+pk1%2C+pk2%2C+pk3+limit+101&p0=b

<img width=""1100"" alt=""image"" src=""https://github.com/simonw/datasette/assets/9599/7ca20120-923b-4b7d-988d-cdb0e7c30afb"">

The `:p0` form field is missing. Submitting the form results in this error:

<img width=""687"" alt=""image"" src=""https://github.com/simonw/datasette/assets/9599/f900ee16-71fd-42aa-86d7-0058af8457aa"">
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2132/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1843600087,I_kwDOBm6k_c5t4xrX,2135,Release notes for 1.0a3,9599,closed,0,,9700784,3,2023-08-09T16:09:26Z,2023-08-09T19:17:07Z,2023-08-09T19:17:06Z,OWNER,,118 commits! https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/1.0a2...26be9f0445b753fb84c802c356b0791a72269f25,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2135/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1843710170,I_kwDOBm6k_c5t5Mja,2136,Query view shouldn't return `columns`,9599,closed,0,,9700784,4,2023-08-09T17:23:57Z,2023-08-09T19:03:04Z,2023-08-09T19:03:04Z,OWNER,,"I just noticed that https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/roadside_attraction_characteristics.json?_labels=on&_size=1 returns:
```json
{
  ""ok"": true,
  ""next"": ""1"",
  ""rows"": [
    {
      ""rowid"": 1,
      ""attraction_id"": {
        ""value"": 1,
        ""label"": ""The Mystery Spot""
      },
      ""characteristic_id"": {
        ""value"": 2,
        ""label"": ""Paranormal""
      }
    }
  ],
  ""truncated"": false
}
```
But https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures.json?sql=select+rowid%2C+attraction_id%2C+characteristic_id+from+roadside_attraction_characteristics+order+by+rowid+limit+1 returns:
```json
{
  ""rows"": [
    {
      ""rowid"": 1,
      ""attraction_id"": 1,
      ""characteristic_id"": 2
    }
  ],
  ""columns"": [
    ""rowid"",
    ""attraction_id"",
    ""characteristic_id""
  ],
  ""ok"": true,
  ""truncated"": false
}
```
The `columns` key in the query response is inconsistent with the table response.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2136/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1700936245,I_kwDOCGYnMM5lYjo1,542,Remove `skip_false=True` and `--no-skip-false` in `sqlite-utils` 4.0,9599,open,0,,9374594,1,2023-05-08T21:04:28Z,2023-05-08T21:07:41Z,,OWNER,,"Following:
- #527

The only reason I didn't remove fix this mis-feature entirely is that it represents a backwards incompatible change. I'll make that change in 4.0.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/542/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
627794879,MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjc3OTQ4Nzk=,782,Redesign default .json format,9599,closed,0,,8755003,55,2020-05-30T18:47:07Z,2023-08-10T00:07:17Z,2023-08-10T00:07:17Z,OWNER,,The default JSON just isn't right. I find myself using `?_shape=array` for almost everything I build against the API.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1197926598,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZujG,1705,How to upgrade your plugin for 1.0 documentation,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-08T23:16:47Z,2022-12-13T05:29:05Z,,OWNER,,"Among other things, needed by:
- #1704",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1705/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1200649124,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHOk,1708,Datasette 1.0 alpha upcoming release notes,9599,open,0,,8755003,2,2022-04-11T22:57:12Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,"I'm going to try writing the release notes first, to see if that helps unblock me.

# ⚠️ Any release notes in this issue are a draft, and should not be treated as the real thing ⚠️ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1708/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1200649502,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHUe,1709,Redesigned JSON API with ?_extra= parameters,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-11T22:57:49Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,This will be the single biggest breaking change for the 1.0 release.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1709/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1200650491,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHj7,1711,Template context powered entirely by the JSON API format,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-11T22:59:27Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,Datasette 1.0 will have a stable template context. I'm going to achieve this by refactoring the templates to work only with keys returned by the API (or some of its extras) - then the API documentation will double up as template documentation.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1711/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1216436131,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IgVej,1721,"Implement plugin hooks: `register_table_extras`, `register_row_extras`, `register_query_extras`",9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-04-26T20:21:49Z,2022-12-13T05:29:07Z,,OWNER,,"Designed in:
- #1720

Part of:
- #262
- #1709",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1721/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1219385669,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IrllF,1729,Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView,9599,open,0,,8755003,12,2022-04-28T22:28:14Z,2022-12-13T05:29:07Z,,OWNER,,"Part of:
- #262
- #1518",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1426080014,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAEEO,1867,/db/table/-/rename API (also allows atomic replace),9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-10-27T18:13:23Z,2023-01-09T15:34:12Z,,OWNER,,"> There's one catch with batched inserts: if your CLI tool fails half way through you could end up with a partially populated table - since a bunch of batches will have succeeded first.
>
> ...
>
> If people care about that kind of thing they could always push all of their inserts to a table called `_tablename` and then atomically rename that once they've uploaded all of the data (assuming I provide an atomic-rename-this-table mechanism).

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1866#issuecomment-1293893789_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1867/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1428630253,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VJyrt,1873,Ensure insert API has good tests for rowid and compound primark key tables,9599,open,0,,8755003,11,2022-10-30T06:22:17Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"Following:
- #1866

I need to design and implement various edge-cases or primary keys:

- Table without an auto-incrementing primary key
- Table with compound primary keys
- Table with just a `rowid`",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1873/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,reopened
1430797211,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VSDub,1875,Figure out design for JSON errors (consider RFC 7807),9599,open,0,,8755003,7,2022-11-01T03:14:15Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis/ is a brand new standard.

Since I need a neat, predictable format for my JSON errors, maybe I should use this one?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1875/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1447465004,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRpAs,1889,Ability to create new tokens via the API,9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-11-14T06:21:36Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"Refs:
- #1850

Initially I decided that the API shouldn't be able to create new tokens at all - I don't like the idea of an API token holder creating themselves additional tokens.

Then I realized that two of the API features are specifically more useful if you can generate fresh tokens via the API:

- Tokes that expire after a time limit are MUCH more useful if they can be automatically generated
- Likewise, tokens that are restricted to a subset of permissions (see #1855) make more sense to be generated like this, especially in conjunction with expiry times",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1889/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1468495358,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh3X-,1910,Check incoming column types on various write APIs,9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-11-29T18:09:10Z,2022-12-13T05:29:09Z,,OWNER,,"> I do think this needs type checking - I just tried and you really can send a string to an integer column and have it work, which feels bad.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1331089156_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1910/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1468689139,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ximrz,1914,Finalize design of JSON for Datasette 1.0,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-11-29T20:59:10Z,2022-12-13T06:15:54Z,,OWNER,,"Tracking issue.

- [ ] #1709
- [ ] #1729
- [ ] #1875",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1914/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1490576818,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Y2GWy,1943,`/-/permissions` should list available permissions,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-12-11T23:38:03Z,2022-12-15T00:41:37Z,,OWNER,,"> Idea: a `/-/permissions` introspection endpoint for listing registered permissions

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1939#issuecomment-1345691103_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1943/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1493471221,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZBI_1,1949,`.json` errors should be returned as JSON,9599,open,0,,8755003,10,2022-12-13T06:14:12Z,2022-12-15T00:46:27Z,,OWNER,,"Eg the error in this issue:
- #1945 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1949/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1495716243,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZJtGT,1952,Improvements to /-/create-token restrictions interface,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-12-14T05:22:39Z,2022-12-14T05:23:13Z,,OWNER,,"> It would be neat not to show write permissions against immutable databases too - and not hard from a performance perspective since it doesn't involve hundreds more permission checks.
>
> That will need permissions to grow a flag for if they need a mutable database though, which is a bigger job.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1947#issuecomment-1350414402_

Also, DO show the `_memory` database there if Datasette was started in `--crossdb` mode.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1952/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1633077183,I_kwDOBm6k_c5hVse_,2041,Remove obsolete table POST code,9599,closed,0,,8755003,2,2023-03-21T01:01:40Z,2023-03-21T01:17:44Z,2023-03-21T01:17:43Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this in:
- #1999

`POST /db/table` currently executes obsolete code for inserting a row - I replaced that with `/db/table/-/insert` in 
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/6e788b49edf4f842c0817f006eb9d865778eea5e but forgot to remove the old code.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2041/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1646734246,I_kwDOBm6k_c5iJyum,2049,Custom SQL queries should use new JSON ?_extra= format,9599,open,0,,8755003,4,2023-03-30T00:42:53Z,2023-04-05T23:29:27Z,,OWNER,,"Related:
- #262

I've made the change to the table view, now I need the new format to work for arbitrary SQL queries too.

Note that this incorporates both arbitrary SQL queries and canned queries.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2049/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1649791661,I_kwDOBm6k_c5iVdKt,2050,Row page JSON should use new ?_extra= format,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2023-03-31T17:56:53Z,2023-03-31T17:59:49Z,,OWNER,,"https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable/2.json

Related:
- #2049
- #1709 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2050/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1822939274,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp9iK,2113,Implement and document extras for the new query view page,9599,open,0,,8755003,3,2023-07-26T18:24:01Z,2023-08-09T17:35:22Z,,OWNER,,- #2109 ,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2113/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1843821954,I_kwDOBm6k_c5t5n2C,2137,Redesign row default JSON,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2023-08-09T18:49:11Z,2023-08-09T19:02:47Z,,OWNER,,"This URL here:

https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/simple_primary_key/1.json?_extras=foreign_key_tables

```json
{
  ""database"": ""fixtures"",
  ""table"": ""simple_primary_key"",
  ""rows"": [
    {
      ""id"": ""1"",
      ""content"": ""hello""
    }
  ],
  ""columns"": [
    ""id"",
    ""content""
  ],
  ""primary_keys"": [
    ""id""
  ],
  ""primary_key_values"": [
    ""1""
  ],
  ""units"": {},
  ""foreign_key_tables"": [
    {
      ""other_table"": ""foreign_key_references"",
      ""column"": ""id"",
      ""other_column"": ""foreign_key_with_blank_label"",
      ""count"": 0,
      ""link"": ""/fixtures/foreign_key_references?foreign_key_with_blank_label=1""
    },
    {
      ""other_table"": ""foreign_key_references"",
      ""column"": ""id"",
      ""other_column"": ""foreign_key_with_label"",
      ""count"": 1,
      ""link"": ""/fixtures/foreign_key_references?foreign_key_with_label=1""
    },
    {
      ""other_table"": ""complex_foreign_keys"",
      ""column"": ""id"",
      ""other_column"": ""f3"",
      ""count"": 1,
      ""link"": ""/fixtures/complex_foreign_keys?f3=1""
    },
    {
      ""other_table"": ""complex_foreign_keys"",
      ""column"": ""id"",
      ""other_column"": ""f2"",
      ""count"": 0,
      ""link"": ""/fixtures/complex_foreign_keys?f2=1""
    },
    {
      ""other_table"": ""complex_foreign_keys"",
      ""column"": ""id"",
      ""other_column"": ""f1"",
      ""count"": 1,
      ""link"": ""/fixtures/complex_foreign_keys?f1=1""
    }
  ],
  ""query_ms"": 4.226590999678592,
  ""source"": ""tests/fixtures.py"",
  ""source_url"": ""https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/tests/fixtures.py"",
  ""license"": ""Apache License 2.0"",
  ""license_url"": ""https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/LICENSE"",
  ""ok"": true,
  ""truncated"": false
}
```

That `?_extras=` should be `?_extra=` - plus the row JSON should be redesigned to fit the new default JSON representation.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2137/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1844213115,I_kwDOBm6k_c5t7HV7,2138,on_success_message_sql option for writable canned queries,9599,closed,0,,8755003,2,2023-08-10T00:20:14Z,2023-08-10T00:39:40Z,2023-08-10T00:34:26Z,OWNER,,"> Or... how about if the `on_success_message` option could define a SQL query to be executed to generate that message? Maybe `on_success_message_sql`.

- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2134",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2138/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1846076261,I_kwDOBm6k_c5uCONl,2139,border-color: ##ff0000 bug - two hashes,9599,closed,0,,8755003,2,2023-08-11T01:22:58Z,2023-08-11T05:16:24Z,2023-08-11T05:16:24Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this on https://latest.datasette.io/extra_database

```html
<div class=""page-header"" style=""border-color: ##ff0000"">
```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2139/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1978023780,I_kwDOBm6k_c515j9k,2205,request.post_vars() method obliterates form keys with multiple values,9599,open,0,,8755003,3,2023-11-05T23:25:08Z,2023-11-06T04:10:34Z,,OWNER,,"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/452a587e236ef642cbc6ae345b58767ea8420cb5/datasette/utils/asgi.py#L137-L139

In GET requests you can do `?foo=1&foo=2` - you can do the same in POST requests, but the `dict()` call here eliminates those duplicates.

You can't even try calling `post_body()` and implement your own custom parsing because of:
- #2204",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2205/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1138008042,I_kwDOBm6k_c5D1J_q,1636,"""permissions"" propery in metadata for configuring arbitrary permissions",9599,closed,0,,8711695,14,2022-02-15T00:25:59Z,2022-12-13T02:40:50Z,2022-12-13T02:40:50Z,OWNER,,"The `""allow""` block mechanism can already be used to configure various default permissions. When adding permissions to `datasette-tiddlywiki` I realized it would be good to be able to configure arbitrary permissions such as `edit-tiddlywiki` there too.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1423336089,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1mKZ,1855,`datasette create-token` ability to create tokens with a reduced set of permissions,9599,closed,0,,8711695,19,2022-10-26T02:20:52Z,2022-12-14T01:24:49Z,2022-12-13T05:20:24Z,OWNER,,"Initial design ideas: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1289733483

> Token design concept:
> 
> ```json
> {
>     ""t"": {
>         ""a"": [""ir"", ""ur"", ""dr""],
>         ""d"": {
>             ""fixtures"": [""ir"", ""ur"", ""dr""]
>         },
>         ""t"": {
>             ""fixtures"": {
>                 ""searchable"": [""ir""]
>             }
>         }
>     }
> }
> ```
> 
> That JSON would be minified and signed.
> 
> Minified version of the above looks like this (101 characters):
> 
> `{""t"":{""a"":[""ir"",""ur"",""dr""],""d"":{""fixtures"":[""ir"",""ur"",""dr""]},""t"":{""fixtures"":{""searchable"":[""ir""]}}}}`
> 
> The `""t""` key shows this is a token that as a default API key.
> 
> `""a""` means ""all"" - these are permissions that have been granted on all tables and databases.
> 
> `""d""` means ""databases"" - this is a way to set permissions for all tables in a specific database.
> 
> `""t""` means ""tables"" - this lets you set permissions at a finely grained table level.
> 
> Then the permissions themselves are two character codes which are shortened versions - so:
> 
> * `ir` = `insert-row`
> * `ur` = `update-row`
> * `dr` = `delete-row`

## Remaining tasks

- [x] Add these options to the `datasette create-token` command
- [x] Tests for `datasette create-token` options
- [x] Documentation for those options at https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/authentication.html#datasette-create-token
- [x] A way to handle permissions that don't have known abbreviations (permissions added by plugins). Probably need to solve the plugin permission registration problem as part of that
- [x] Stop hard-coding names of actions in the `permission_allowed_actor_restrictions` function",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1855/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1432013704,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWsuI,1878,/db/table/-/upsert API,9599,closed,0,,8711695,8,2022-11-01T20:01:18Z,2022-12-08T01:12:18Z,2022-12-08T01:12:17Z,OWNER,,Equivalent to `sqlite-utils upsert`: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/python-api.html#upserting-data,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1878/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1473411197,I_kwDOBm6k_c5X0nh9,1927,ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API,9599,closed,0,,8711695,5,2022-12-02T20:32:30Z,2022-12-15T01:47:01Z,2022-12-08T01:43:01Z,OWNER,,"See also:
- #1924

It turns out I want to be able to call `/db/-/create` multiple times with the `rows` argument, so that I don't have to worry about creating the table first.

As such I find myself wanting support for the `""insert"": true` and `""replace"": true` options as well.

Still TODO:

- [x] A test for the case where you call `/-/create` twice with `rows` without using these options
- [x] `pk` should be required if you are using these options
- [x] Error if you pass `pk` and the table exists already but has a different `pk`
- [x] Documentation for `insert` and `replace` - and what happens if you repeat a `/-/create` with rows generally
- [x] Documentation should explain that you are allowed to call `/-/create` more than once using `rows`.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1473814539,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5EMVug,1931,/db/table/-/upsert,9599,closed,0,,8711695,8,2022-12-03T07:01:44Z,2022-12-08T01:12:17Z,2022-12-08T01:12:16Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1931,"Refs #1878

Still todo:
- [x] Support `""return"": true` properly for upserts (with tests)
- [x] Require both `insert-row` and `update-row` permissions
- [x] Tests are going to need to cover both rowid-only and compound primary key tables, including all of the error states
- [x] Documentation

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette start -->
----
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1931.org.readthedocs.build/en/1931/

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette end -->",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1931/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
1483320357,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Yaawl,1937,/db/-/create API should require insert-rows permission to use row: or rows: option,9599,closed,0,,8711695,2,2022-12-08T01:33:09Z,2022-12-14T20:21:26Z,2022-12-14T20:21:26Z,OWNER,,Otherwise someone with `create-table` but no` insert-rows` permission could abuse it to insert data.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1937/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1485488236,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5E1iJG,1938,"""permissions"" blocks in metadata.json/yaml",9599,closed,0,,8711695,3,2022-12-08T22:07:36Z,2022-12-13T05:23:18Z,2022-12-13T05:23:18Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1938,"Refs #1636

- [x] Documentation
- [ ] Implementation
- [ ] Validate metadata to check there are no nonsensical permissions (like `debug-menu` set at the table level)
- [ ] Tests

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette start -->
----
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1938.org.readthedocs.build/en/1938/

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette end -->",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1938/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
1485757511,I_kwDOBm6k_c5YjtxH,1939,register_permissions(datasette) plugin hook,9599,closed,0,,8711695,20,2022-12-09T01:33:25Z,2022-12-13T02:07:50Z,2022-12-13T02:05:56Z,OWNER,,"A plugin hook that adds more named permissions to the list which is initially populated here:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e539c1c024bc62d88df91d9107cbe37e7f0fe55f/datasette/permissions.py#L1-L19

Originally imagined this hook in this comment:

- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1881#issuecomment-1301639370

I need this for a few reasons:

- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636
  - Needs it in order to validate that permissions defined in `metadata.json` are set in the right place (don't set an instance permissions at table level for example)
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855
  - Needs it to be able to register additional abbreviations for use in signed cookies
  - And for validation when you use `datasette create-token` and pass in extra permissions
- The https://latest.datasette.io/-/permissions debug interface needs it to add extra debug options to the `<select>`",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1939/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1486011362,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5E3XqB,1940,register_permissions() plugin hook,9599,closed,0,,8711695,6,2022-12-09T05:09:28Z,2022-12-13T02:05:55Z,2022-12-13T02:05:54Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1940,"Refs #1939

From this comment: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1939#issuecomment-1343872168

- [x] Unit test for the registration plugin hook itself
- [x] Use them in `check_permission_actions_are_documented` test in `conftest.py`
- [x] Add description field to `Permissions` (and update tests and docs)
- [x] Documentation for `datasette.permissions` dictionary
- [x] If no `default=` provided in call to `permission_allowed()` then use default from `datasette.permissions` list
- [x] Remove `default=` from a bunch of places
- [x] Throw an error if two permissions are registered with the same name or abbreviation (but other attributes differ)
- [x] Update authentication and permissions documentation to explain that permissions are now registered and have a registered default

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette start -->
----
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1940.org.readthedocs.build/en/1940/

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette end -->",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1940/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
1493306655,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZAg0f,1945,`view-instance` should not be checked for /-/actor.json,9599,closed,0,,8711695,0,2022-12-13T04:01:46Z,2022-12-13T04:11:56Z,2022-12-13T04:11:56Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this while testing:

- #1855
```
export TOKEN=$(datasette create-token root --secret s -a foo)
curl -H ""Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"" http://localhost:8002/-/actor.json
```
Returned a Forbidden error (and not in JSON either).",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1945/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1493339206,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZAoxG,1946,`datasette --get` mechanism for sending tokens,9599,closed,0,,8711695,2,2022-12-13T04:25:05Z,2022-12-13T04:36:57Z,2022-12-13T04:36:57Z,OWNER,,"> For the tests for `datasette create-token` it would be useful if `datasette --get` had a mechanism for sending an `Authorization: Bearer X` header.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855#issuecomment-1347731288_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1946/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1493390939,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZA1Zb,1947,UI to create reduced scope tokens from the `/-/create-token` page,9599,closed,0,,8711695,22,2022-12-13T05:10:48Z,2022-12-14T05:22:00Z,2022-12-14T05:13:24Z,OWNER,,"Split from:
- #1855",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1947/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1495431932,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZInr8,1951,`datasette.create_token(...)` method for creating signed API tokens,9599,closed,0,,8711695,6,2022-12-14T01:25:34Z,2022-12-14T02:43:45Z,2022-12-14T02:42:05Z,OWNER,,"I need this for:
- #1947

And I can refactor this to use it too:
- #1855

By making this a documented internal API it can be used by other plugins too. It's also going to be really useful for writing tests.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1951/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1495821607,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZKG0n,1953,Release notes for Datasette 1.0a2,9599,closed,0,,8711695,2,2022-12-14T06:26:40Z,2022-12-15T02:02:15Z,2022-12-15T02:01:08Z,OWNER,,"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/milestone/27?closed=1

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/1.0a1...9ad76d279e2c3874ca5070626a25458ce129f126",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1953/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1497288666,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZPs_a,1956,Handle abbreviations properly in permission_allowed_actor_restrictions,9599,closed,0,,8711695,2,2022-12-14T19:54:21Z,2022-12-14T20:04:29Z,2022-12-14T20:04:28Z,OWNER,,"This code currently assumes abbreviations are:

 ```pyton
action_initials = """".join([word[0] for word in action.split(""-"")])
```

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1a3dcf494376e32f7cff110c86a88e5b0a3f3924/datasette/default_permissions.py#L182-L208

That's no longer correct, they are now registered by the new plugin hook:
- #1939 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1956/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1421529723,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UutJ7,1850,Write API in Datasette core,9599,closed,0,,8658075,13,2022-10-24T22:13:24Z,2022-11-29T20:11:20Z,2022-11-29T20:11:20Z,OWNER,,"I need this for Datasette Cloud, and in thinking it through I realized that it's really time Datasette grew a default write API as well.

I'm going to mostly model this off `sqlite-utils`, since I've spent a bunch of time iterating on a pseudo-JSON API for that over the past few years (piping JSON to stdin etc).

I want this for Datasette 1.0. I'm going to be building it in the new [1.0-dev](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/tree/1.0-dev) branch, which is automatically deployed to https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/ running on Cloud Run.

API features to build:

- [x] #1852
  - [x] #1856
  - [x] #1857
  - [x] #1858
  - [x] #1859
- [x] #1871
  - [x] #1888
- [x] #1868
- [x] #1851
- [x] #1863
- [x] #1864
- [x] #1866
- [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882
- [x] #1862
- [x] #1874
  - [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1887
- [x] #1877

Bumped to later on:

- #1855
- #1878
- #1873
- #1875
- Make sure CORS works
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1889
- Alter a table - `sqlite-utils transform` style (more powerful than straight ALTER)
- Execute SQL against a write connection
- Maybe even multiple write SQL statements bundled in a single transaction
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1867
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1850/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1421544654,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UuwzO,1851,API to insert a single record into an existing table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,22,2022-10-24T22:24:21Z,2022-11-15T19:59:18Z,2022-10-28T00:59:25Z,OWNER,,Controlled by a new `insert-row` permission.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1421552095,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Uuynf,1852,Default API token authentication mechanism,9599,closed,0,,8658075,30,2022-10-24T22:31:07Z,2022-11-15T19:57:00Z,2022-10-26T02:19:54Z,OWNER,,"API authentication will be via `Authorization: Bearer XXX` request headers.

I'm inclined to add a default token mechanism to Datasette based on tokens that are signed with the `DATASETTE_SECRET`. Maybe the root user can access `/-/create-token` which provides a UI for generating a time-limited signed token? Could also have a `datasette token` command for creating such tokens at the command-line.

Plugins can then define alternative ways of creating tokens, such as the existing https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-auth-tokens plugin.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1289706439_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1423336122,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1mK6,1856,allow_signed_tokens setting for disabling API signed token mechanism,9599,closed,0,,8658075,3,2022-10-26T02:20:55Z,2022-11-15T19:57:05Z,2022-10-26T02:58:35Z,OWNER,,"Had some design thoughts here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291272280

I liked this option the most:

    --setting allow_create_tokens off",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1856/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1423347412,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1o7U,1857,Prevent API tokens from using /-/create-token to create more tokens,9599,closed,0,,8658075,1,2022-10-26T02:38:09Z,2022-11-15T19:57:11Z,2022-10-26T02:57:26Z,OWNER,,"> It strikes me that users should NOT be able to use a token to create additional tokens.
>
> The current design actually does allow that, since the `dstok_` Bearer token can be used to authenticate calls to the `/-/create-token` page.
>
> So I think I need a mechanism whereby that page can only allow access to users authenticated by cookie.
> 
> Not obvious how to do that though, since Datasette's authentication actor system is designed to abstract that detail away!

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1291417100_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1857/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1423364990,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1tN-,1858,`max_signed_tokens_ttl` setting for a maximum duration on API tokens,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-10-26T03:05:53Z,2022-11-15T19:58:52Z,2022-10-27T03:15:05Z,OWNER,,"It's currently possible to use `/-/create-token` to create a token that lasts forever.

Some administrators may wish to have a maximum expiry instead. I should support that with a setting.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1858/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1423369494,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1uUW,1859,datasette create-token CLI command,9599,closed,0,,8658075,3,2022-10-26T03:12:59Z,2022-11-15T19:59:00Z,2022-10-26T04:31:39Z,OWNER,,The CLI equivalent of the `/-/create-token` page.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1859/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1425011030,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U7_FW,1862,"Create a new table from one or more records, `sqlite-utils` style",9599,closed,0,,8658075,5,2022-10-27T04:25:02Z,2022-11-15T19:59:47Z,2022-11-15T06:42:09Z,OWNER,,"It's interesting to also think about what the form-based UI for this could look like - since that would involve users creating new columns of different types on the fly.

Will need the `create-table` permission.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1862/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1425029242,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U8Dh6,1863,Update a single record in an existing table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,16,2022-10-27T04:53:17Z,2022-11-29T18:08:53Z,2022-11-29T18:06:37Z,OWNER,,"API design:

```
POST /db/table/row-pks/-/update
{
   ""field"": ""updated_value""
}
```
Only the fields that you pass will be updated.

Maybe this is the wrong design though? The design for insert currently looks like this:

- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1294224185

```
POST /db/table/-/insert
Authorization: Bearer xxx
Content-Type: application/json
{
  ""row"": {
    ""id"": 1,
    ""name"": ""New name""
  }
}
```
I could use the same format for `/-/update`, but in this case the API doesn't require you to pass every field so `""row""` doesn't seem like the right key.

I think I'll go with this:

```
POST /db/table/1/-/update
Authorization: Bearer xxx
Content-Type: application/json
{
  ""update"": {
    ""name"": ""New name""
  }
}
```
The benefit of having an `""update""` key is that it allows me to use other keys in the future. Maybe a `""alter"": true` key to indicate that new columns should be added if they are missing.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1425029275,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U8Dib,1864,Delete a single record from an existing table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-10-27T04:53:22Z,2022-11-29T18:54:04Z,2022-11-29T18:54:04Z,OWNER,,"API design:
```
POST /db/table/row-pks/-/delete
Or...
DELETE /db/table/row-pks/-/delete
```
I'm just going to do `POST` for the moment, like I did here:
- #1874

Permission: `delete-row`

Still needed:

- [ ] Tests for rowid tables
- [ ] Tests for compound primary keys",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1864/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1426001541,I_kwDOBm6k_c5U_w6F,1866,API for bulk inserting records into a table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,12,2022-10-27T17:19:25Z,2022-11-15T19:59:34Z,2022-10-30T06:04:07Z,OWNER,,"Similar to https://github.com/simonw/datasette-insert/blob/0.8/README.md#inserting-data-and-creating-tables

I expect this to become by far the most common way that data gets into a Datasette instance - more so than the individual row API in:
- #1851 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1866/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1426195437,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAgPt,1868,Design URLs for the write API,9599,closed,0,,8658075,5,2022-10-27T19:55:30Z,2022-11-15T19:59:14Z,2022-10-27T20:07:01Z,OWNER,,"My original design for this issue:
- #1851

Was `POST /db/table` with JSON of `{""insert"": {...}}`.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1868/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1427293909,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VEsbV,1871,API explorer tool,9599,closed,0,,8658075,24,2022-10-28T13:49:11Z,2022-11-15T19:59:05Z,2022-11-14T04:59:59Z,OWNER,,The API will be much easier to develop if there's a page that helps you execute JSON POSTs against it.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1871/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1429030341,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VLUXF,1874,API to drop a table,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-10-30T21:55:11Z,2022-11-15T19:59:53Z,2022-11-14T05:45:06Z,OWNER,,"`POST /db/table/-/drop`

Require `drop-table` permission.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1874/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1435294468,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VjNsE,1882,`/db/-/create` API for creating tables,9599,closed,0,,8658075,12,2022-11-03T21:44:32Z,2022-11-15T19:59:43Z,2022-11-15T06:00:41Z,OWNER,,">  It really feels like this should be accompanied by a `/db/-/create` API for creating tables. I had to add that to `sqlite-utils` eventually (initially it only supported creating by passing in an example document):
>
> https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#cli-create-table

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1862#issuecomment-1299073433_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1447388809,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRWaJ,1887,Add a confirm step to the drop table API,9599,closed,0,,8658075,2,2022-11-14T04:59:53Z,2022-11-15T19:59:59Z,2022-11-14T05:18:51Z,OWNER,,"> In playing with the API explorer just now I realized it's way too easy to accidentally drop a table using it.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1871#issuecomment-1313097057_

Added drop table API in:
- #1874",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1887/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1447439985,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRi5x,1888,API explorer should take immutability into account,9599,closed,0,,8658075,1,2022-11-14T06:00:14Z,2022-11-15T19:59:10Z,2022-11-14T06:04:48Z,OWNER,,"Refs:
- #1871

I noticed the API explorer doesn't show any links on https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/-/api because the `fixtures` database is immutable.

It should still show read examples there.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1888/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1450303205,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wcd7l,1891,1.0a0 release notes,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-11-15T19:58:20Z,2022-11-29T19:23:41Z,2022-11-29T19:23:41Z,OWNER,,"This release will mainly help preview the new Datasette write API:
- #1850",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1891/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1450312343,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WcgKX,1892,Merge 1.0-dev branch back to main,9599,closed,0,,8658075,3,2022-11-15T20:04:25Z,2022-11-29T19:40:23Z,2022-11-29T19:40:23Z,OWNER,,"I'm committed enough to the 1.0 work now that I'm ready for the `main` branch to reflect that instead.

If I need to make any dot-releases against 0.63 I can do those from a branch.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1892/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1452364777,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WkVPp,1896,Extract logic for resolving a URL to a database / table / row,9599,closed,0,,8658075,4,2022-11-16T22:25:20Z,2022-11-18T22:57:47Z,2022-11-18T22:56:55Z,OWNER,,">  In trying to write this I realize that there's a lot of duplicated code with delete row, specifically around resolving the incoming URL into a row (or a database or a table).
>
> Since this is so common, I think it's worth extracting the logic out first.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1317755263_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1896/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1455932972,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx8Ys,1904,Datasette Lite tests failing due to httpx upgrade,9599,closed,0,,8658075,0,2022-11-18T22:49:31Z,2022-11-18T22:57:48Z,2022-11-18T22:52:22Z,OWNER,,"Same problem as this one:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-lite/issues/56

Caused this failure: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3500765964",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1904/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1468519699,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh9UT,1911,`/db/-/create` should support creating tables with compound primary keys,9599,closed,0,,8658075,2,2022-11-29T18:30:47Z,2022-11-29T18:50:58Z,2022-11-29T18:48:05Z,OWNER,,"Found myself needing this to write the tests for:
- #1864 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1911/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1468603401,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XiRwJ,1913,Release Datasette 1.0a0,9599,closed,0,,8658075,9,2022-11-29T19:41:42Z,2022-11-29T20:10:35Z,2022-11-29T20:10:35Z,OWNER,,"I attempted the release just now - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/1.0a0 -  and got an unexpected test failure:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3577355358/attempts/1

```
>       assert delete_response.status_code == 200
E       assert 404 == 200
E        +  where 404 = <Response [404 Not Found]>.status_code

/home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/tests/test_api_write.py:396: AssertionError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_api_write.py::test_delete_row[compound_pk_table-row_for_create2-pks2-article,k] - assert 404 == 200
 +  where 404 = <Response [404 Not Found]>.status_code
```
I hit ""retry"" on that test but I expect it to fail again.

",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1913/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1319881016,PR_kwDOCGYnMM48Mmde,457,Link to installation instructions,9599,closed,0,,8355157,2,2022-07-27T17:38:36Z,2022-08-27T03:55:52Z,2022-07-27T17:57:50Z,OWNER,simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/457,Also testing https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/pull-requests.html,140912432,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/457/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
1320243134,I_kwDOCGYnMM5OsU--,458,Support custom names for registered functions,9599,closed,0,,8355157,1,2022-07-28T00:13:00Z,2022-08-27T03:56:01Z,2022-07-28T00:13:57Z,OWNER,,"In this example:

```python
    @db.register_function
    def reverse_string(s):
        return """".join(reversed(list(s)))

    print(db.execute('select reverse_string(""hello"")').fetchone()[0])
```
There's currently no way to over-ride the automatically selected name for the SQL function.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/458/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1348169997,I_kwDOCGYnMM5QW3EN,467,Mechanism for ensuring a table has all the columns,9599,closed,0,,8355157,13,2022-08-23T15:50:23Z,2022-08-27T23:19:41Z,2022-08-27T23:17:56Z,OWNER,,Suggested by @jefftriplett on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/997738192360964156/1011655389063958600,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/467/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1348294436,PR_kwDOCGYnMM49qP2V,468,"db[table].create(..., transform=True) and create-table --transform",9599,closed,0,,8355157,6,2022-08-23T17:27:58Z,2022-08-27T23:17:55Z,2022-08-27T23:17:55Z,OWNER,simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/468,"Work in progress. Still needs documentation and tests (and to cover more cases of things that might have changed).

Refs:
- #467

<!-- readthedocs-preview sqlite-utils start -->
----
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://sqlite-utils--468.org.readthedocs.build/en/468/

<!-- readthedocs-preview sqlite-utils end -->",140912432,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/468/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
1352931464,I_kwDOCGYnMM5QpBiI,469,sqlite-utils rows --order option,9599,closed,0,,8355157,1,2022-08-27T03:49:51Z,2022-08-27T04:30:49Z,2022-08-27T04:10:32Z,OWNER,,"For consistency with `search`: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli-reference.html#search

```
  -o, --order TEXT       Order by ('column' or 'column desc')
```

I wanted to run `sqlite-utils rows db.db mytable --order 'rowid desc'` to see the most recently imported rows.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/469/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1352932038,I_kwDOCGYnMM5QpBrG,470,Upgrade `--load-extension` to accept entrypoints like Datasette,9599,closed,0,,8355157,6,2022-08-27T03:53:20Z,2022-08-27T05:55:49Z,2022-08-27T05:55:48Z,OWNER,,"Imitate:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1789
```
# would load default entrypoint like before
datasette data.db --load-extension ext

# loads the extensions with the ""sqlite3_foo_init"" entrpoint
datasette data.db --load-extension ext:sqlite3_foo_init

# loads the extensions with the ""sqlite3_bar_init"" entrpoint
datasette data.db --load-extension ext:sqlite3_bar_init
```",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/470/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1352932716,I_kwDOCGYnMM5QpB1s,471,sqlite-utils query --functions mechanism for registering extra functions,9599,closed,0,,8355157,12,2022-08-27T03:57:53Z,2022-09-07T03:46:26Z,2022-08-27T05:10:57Z,OWNER,,"It would be really cool if you could register additional custom SQL functions for use with the `sqlite-utils query` command - something like this:

```
sqlite-utils data.db 'update images set domain = extract_domain(url)' --functions '
from urllib.parse import urlparse

def extract_domain(url):
    return urlparse(url).netloc
'
```
Every function defined in that code block would be registered with the connection, unless the name began with an underscore.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/471/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1352946135,I_kwDOCGYnMM5QpFHX,472,Reuse the locals/globals fix from --functions for other code accepting options,9599,closed,0,,8355157,2,2022-08-27T05:12:05Z,2022-08-27T05:20:12Z,2022-08-27T05:20:12Z,OWNER,,"I figured out a workaround for the ugly `global x` hack here:
- https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/471#issuecomment-1229120653",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/472/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1353189941,I_kwDOCGYnMM5QqAo1,475,table.default_values introspection property,9599,closed,0,,8355157,1,2022-08-27T22:33:31Z,2022-08-27T22:44:46Z,2022-08-27T22:43:02Z,OWNER,,"> Interesting challenge with `default_value`: I need to be able to tell if the default values passed to `.create()` differ from those in the database already.
>
> Introspecting that is a bit tricky:
>
> ```pycon
> >>> import sqlite_utils
> >>> db = sqlite_utils.Database(memory=True)
> >>> db[""blah""].create({""id"": int, ""name"": str}, not_null=(""name"",), defaults={""name"": ""bob""})
> <Table blah (id, name)>
> >>> db[""blah""].columns
> [Column(cid=0, name='id', type='INTEGER', notnull=0, default_value=None, is_pk=0), Column(cid=1, name='name', type='TEXT', notnull=1, default_value=""'bob'"", is_pk=0)]
> ```
> Note how a default value of the Python string `bob` is represented in the results of `PRAGMA table_info()` as `default_value=""'bob'""` - it's got single quotes added to it!
> 
> So comparing default values from introspecting the database needs me to first parse that syntax. This may require a new table introspection method.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/468#issuecomment-1229279539_",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/475/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1353196970,I_kwDOCGYnMM5QqCWq,476,Release notes for 3.29,9599,closed,0,,8355157,2,2022-08-27T23:21:21Z,2022-08-28T04:07:15Z,2022-08-28T04:07:03Z,OWNER,,https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/compare/3.28...104f37fa4d2e7e5999c1d829267b62c737f74d3e,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/476/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1223527226,I_kwDOBm6k_c5I7Ys6,1738,"""Cannot use _sort and _sort_desc at the same time""",9599,closed,0,,8303187,2,2022-05-03T01:06:24Z,2022-08-14T16:13:55Z,2022-08-14T16:13:55Z,OWNER,,"Triggered this error while playing with the sort desc checkbox and the apply button that are only visible on this page at mobile screen width:

https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys?_sort_desc=pk1

Navigate to that page (with the browser narrow enough to show the box), un-check the box and click Apply:

![sort-bug](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/166390804-cb289b29-63dc-4986-b7f9-81cf2ae04914.gif)

Also notable: I managed to get to a page with `?_sort_desk=pk1` in the URL three times by clicking around with that button.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1738/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1296222572,I_kwDOBm6k_c5NQsls,1768,Upgrade to 3.10.6-slim-bullseye Docker base image,9599,closed,0,,8303187,5,2022-07-06T18:37:49Z,2022-08-14T15:54:36Z,2022-08-14T15:54:11Z,OWNER,,For the package published to Docker Hub and also the containers used by `datasette package` and `datasette publish cloudrun`.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1768/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1306492437,I_kwDOBm6k_c5N334V,1770,`handle_exception` plugin hook for custom error handling,9599,closed,0,,8303187,14,2022-07-15T20:52:49Z,2022-08-14T15:25:51Z,2022-08-14T15:25:51Z,OWNER,,"I need this for a couple of plugins, both of which are broken at the moment:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-sentry/issues/1
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-show-errors/issues/2",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1770/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1318907685,I_kwDOBm6k_c5OnO8l,1773,500 error if sorted by a column not in the ?_col= list,9599,closed,0,,8303187,4,2022-07-27T01:20:27Z,2022-08-14T16:06:25Z,2022-08-14T15:44:05Z,OWNER,,"For example: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/sortable?_sort_desc=sortable&_col=sortable_with_nulls

That's `?_sort_desc=sortable&_col=sortable_with_nulls`

<img width=""494"" alt=""image"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/181139719-06e3bf66-3fde-4f9a-bfd1-62b326121601.png"">
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1773/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1338137350,I_kwDOBm6k_c5PwlsG,1781,Ensure Datasette Lite is promoted in docs and README,9599,closed,0,,8303187,1,2022-08-14T05:12:35Z,2022-08-14T15:24:40Z,2022-08-14T15:24:40Z,OWNER,,As of 0.62 https://lite.datasette.io is a supported piece of the overall Datasette ecosystem.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1781/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1338278056,I_kwDOBm6k_c5PxICo,1782,Release notes for Datasette 0.62,9599,closed,0,,8303187,2,2022-08-14T15:26:45Z,2022-08-14T17:40:45Z,2022-08-14T17:32:54Z,OWNER,,"I've written a lot of these already for the alphas:

- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.62a0
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.62a1",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1782/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1469015001,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj2PZ,1916,GET requests against POST endpoints should not 500 error,9599,closed,0,,7867486,1,2022-11-30T04:04:43Z,2022-11-30T05:15:19Z,2022-11-30T05:15:19Z,OWNER,,"![CF37BA4D-0677-4DDD-A339-EAF163BB63B7](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/204705025-6f88e9f7-757d-45e8-a89c-ab97e84781e8.png)
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1916/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1469043836,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj9R8,1917,Don't allow writable API to edit the `_memory` database,9599,closed,0,,7867486,2,2022-11-30T04:51:59Z,2022-11-30T05:07:56Z,2022-11-30T05:07:55Z,OWNER,,"It shows up on https://latest.datasette.io/-/api (once you are signed in as root) - but there's no point in creating tables in it because they likely won't persist from one request to the next, as it's not a shared named database.

<img width=""1122"" alt=""image"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/204710529-bfab8442-d89b-4928-9b9a-e39bc53c1673.png"">
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1917/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1469044738,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj9gC,1918,API explorer should list mutable databases first,9599,closed,0,,7867486,1,2022-11-30T04:53:33Z,2022-11-30T05:22:07Z,2022-11-30T05:07:56Z,OWNER,,"https://latest.datasette.io/-/api hides `ephemeral` down at the bottom, would be more interesting if it was at the top.

Related:
- #1915 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1918/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1469973742,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XngTu,1922,Make sure CORS works for write APIs,9599,closed,0,,7867486,13,2022-11-30T17:15:55Z,2022-12-01T18:47:00Z,2022-12-01T18:47:00Z,OWNER,,"Split from:
- #1850",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1922/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1470509936,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XpjNw,1924,Docs for replace:true and ignore:true options for insert API,9599,closed,0,,7867486,4,2022-12-01T01:33:25Z,2022-12-01T18:15:15Z,2022-12-01T02:08:02Z,OWNER,,Equivalent to https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#insert-replacing-data,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1924/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1471969984,I_kwDOBm6k_c5XvHrA,1926,Release notes for 1.0a1 (and release it),9599,closed,0,,7867486,1,2022-12-01T21:18:12Z,2022-12-01T22:06:13Z,2022-12-01T22:06:12Z,OWNER,,"Mainly CORS support and a few small bug fixes.

Changes: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/1.0a0...99da46f7258225fc6fd8e94ddc20859ccccc4109",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1926/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
520740741,MDU6SXNzdWU1MjA3NDA3NDE=,625,If you apply ?_facet_array=tags then &_facet=tags does nothing,9599,closed,0,,7571612,13,2019-11-11T04:59:29Z,2022-01-13T22:26:58Z,2021-12-16T20:12:22Z,OWNER,,"Start here: https://v0-30-2.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_facet_array=tags

<img width=""969"" alt=""fixtures__facetable__15_rows"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/68562011-c0d44480-03fc-11ea-8354-def0ba35d365.png"">

Note that `tags` is offered as a suggested facet. But if you click that you get this:

https://v0-30-2.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_facet_array=tags&_facet=tags

The `_facet=tags` is added to the URL and it's removed from the list of suggested tags... but the facet itself is not displayed:

<img width=""950"" alt=""fixtures__facetable__15_rows"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/68562039-df3a4000-03fc-11ea-9778-81f7a931d608.png"">

The `_facet=tags` facet should look like this:

<img width=""946"" alt=""fixtures__facetable__15_rows"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/68562067-f8db8780-03fc-11ea-8211-26281b7df9f9.png"">
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/625/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
991467558,MDU6SXNzdWU5OTE0Njc1NTg=,1466,Add Datasette Desktop to installation documentation,9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-09-08T19:41:27Z,2022-01-13T22:28:28Z,2022-01-13T21:55:18Z,OWNER,,See https://datasette.io/desktop and https://simonwillison.net/2021/Sep/8/datasette-desktop/,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1466/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1059555791,I_kwDOBm6k_c4_J4nP,1527,Columns starting with an underscore behave poorly in filters,9599,closed,0,,7571612,7,2021-11-22T01:01:36Z,2022-01-14T00:57:08Z,2022-01-14T00:57:08Z,OWNER,,"Similar bug to #1525 (and #1506 before it). Start on https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_facet=_neighborhood - then select a neighborhood - then try to remove that filter using the little ""x"" and submitting the form again.

![filter-bug](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/142786754-31d265a2-944d-4ea2-af6f-305d445a2ccb.gif)
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1527/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed