html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691554088,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782,691554088,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTU1NDA4OA==,9599,simonw,2020-09-12T21:39:03Z,2020-09-12T21:39:03Z,OWNER,"Plan: release a new release of Datasette (probably 0.49) with the new JSON API design, but provide a plugin called something like `datasette-api-0-48` which runs as ASGI wrapping middleware and internally rewrites incoming requests to e.g. `/db/table.json` to behave if they have the `?_extra=` params on them necessary to produce the 0.48 version of the JSON.

Anyone who has built applications against 0.48 can install that plugin.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",627794879,Redesign default .json format,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691526878,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782,691526878,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTUyNjg3OA==,9599,simonw,2020-09-12T18:21:41Z,2020-09-12T18:22:20Z,OWNER,"Would it be so bad if the default format had a `""rows""` key containing the array of rows? Maybe it wouldn't. The reason I always use `?_shape=array` is because I want an array of objects, rather than an array of arrays that I have to match up again with their columns.

A default format that's an object rather than array also gives something for the `?_extra=` parameter to add its extras to.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",627794879,Redesign default .json format,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691526762,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782,691526762,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTUyNjc2Mg==,9599,simonw,2020-09-12T18:20:19Z,2020-09-12T18:20:19Z,OWNER,"I'd like to revisit the idea of using `?_extra=x` to opt-in to extra blocks of JSON, from #262","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",627794879,Redesign default .json format,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691526489,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782,691526489,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTUyNjQ4OQ==,9599,simonw,2020-09-12T18:17:16Z,2020-09-12T18:17:16Z,OWNER,(I think I may have been over-thinking the details of this is for a couple of years now.),"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",627794879,Redesign default .json format,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691526416,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782,691526416,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTUyNjQxNg==,9599,simonw,2020-09-12T18:16:36Z,2020-09-12T18:16:36Z,OWNER,I'm going to hack together a preview of this in a branch and deploy it somewhere so people can see what I've got planned. Much easier to evaluate a working prototype than static examples.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",627794879,Redesign default .json format,