html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-755484384,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782,755484384,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NTQ4NDM4NA==,9599,simonw,2021-01-06T18:31:14Z,2021-01-06T18:31:57Z,OWNER,"In building https://latest-with-plugins.datasette.io/github/issue_comments.Notebook?_labels=on I discovered the following patterns for importing data into both Pandas and Observable/d3:
```python
import pandas
df = pandas.read_json(
  ""https://latest-with-plugins.datasette.io/github/issue_comments.json?_shape=array""
)
```
And:
```javascript
d3 = require(""d3@5"")
rows = d3.json(
    ""https://latest-with-plugins.datasette.io/github/issue_comments.json?_shape=array""
)
```
Once again I find myself torn on the best possible default. A list of JSON objects is instantly compatible with both `pandas.read_json()` and `d3.json()` - but it leaves nowhere to put the extra information like pagination and suchlike!

Even given this I still think the correct default is an object with `""rows""`, `""total""` and `""next_url""` keys. I should commit to that and implement it - this thought exercise has been running for far too long.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",627794879,Redesign default .json format,