html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753587963,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983,753587963,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzU4Nzk2Mw==,154364,dracos,2021-01-03T09:02:50Z,2021-01-03T10:00:05Z,NONE,"> but I'm already commited to requiring support for () => {} arrow functions

Don't think you are :) (e.g. gzipped, using arrow functions in my example saves 2 bytes over spelling out function). On FMS, past month, looking at popular browsers, looks like we'd have 95.41% arrow support, 94.19% module support, and 4.58% (mostly IE9/IE11/Safari 9) supporting neither.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",712260429,JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy,