html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350#issuecomment-987016019,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350,987016019,IC_kwDOCGYnMM461KtT,9599,simonw,2021-12-06T17:56:57Z,2021-12-06T17:56:57Z,OWNER,"Would be interesting to micro-benchmark this to get an idea for how much of a performance boost it is, since the indexed SQLite lookups used by `table.lookup()` should be really fast already.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1072435124,Optional caching mechanism for table.lookup(),
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350#issuecomment-987015327,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350,987015327,IC_kwDOCGYnMM461Kif,9599,simonw,2021-12-06T17:56:05Z,2021-12-06T17:56:05Z,OWNER,Should I implement this remember to apply the optimization in `git-history`.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1072435124,Optional caching mechanism for table.lookup(),
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350#issuecomment-987015063,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350,987015063,IC_kwDOCGYnMM461KeX,9599,simonw,2021-12-06T17:55:42Z,2021-12-06T17:55:42Z,OWNER,"API could be this:
```python
id = db[""columns""].lookup(
    {""namespace"": namespace_id, ""name"": column},
    cache=True
)
```
This could default to a 100 item LRU cache. You could perhaps modify that with `cache_size=500` or with `cache_size=None` to disable the size limit on that cache.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1072435124,Optional caching mechanism for table.lookup(),