html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-692967733,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877,692967733,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5Mjk2NzczMw==,9599,simonw,2020-09-15T20:42:04Z,2020-09-15T20:42:04Z,OWNER,"I'm not going to drop CSRF protection - it's still needed for older browsers - but I have relaxed the circumstances under which it is applied. It only applies to requests that include cookies for example, so API clients that don't send cookies don't need to worry about it.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",648421105,Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely?,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652597975,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877,652597975,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjU5Nzk3NQ==,9599,simonw,2020-07-01T19:12:15Z,2020-07-01T19:12:15Z,OWNER,The latest release of https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens (0.2) now supports SQL configuration of tokens.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",648421105,Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely?,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652520496,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877,652520496,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjUyMDQ5Ng==,9599,simonw,2020-07-01T16:26:52Z,2020-07-01T16:26:52Z,OWNER,Tokens get verified by plugins. So far there's only one: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens - which has you hard-coding plugins in a configuration file. I have a issue there to add support for database-backed tokens too: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens/issues/1,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",648421105,Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely?,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652182990,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877,652182990,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjE4Mjk5MA==,9599,simonw,2020-07-01T04:29:38Z,2020-07-01T04:42:59Z,OWNER,"Have you tried the method described here? https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/internals.html#csrf-protection - I'm happy to bulk out that section of the documentation if that doesn't help solve your problem.

I just closed #835 which should make CSRF protection easier to work with - it won't interfere with requests without cookies or requests with `Authentication: Bearer token` tokens. See also https://github.com/simonw/asgi-csrf/issues/11

You can try out `pip install datasette==0.45a5` to get those features. Hopefully releasing a full 0.45 tomorrow.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",648421105,Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely?,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-651984989,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877,651984989,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk4NDk4OQ==,9599,simonw,2020-06-30T19:03:25Z,2020-06-30T19:03:25Z,OWNER,Relevant: #835,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",648421105,Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely?,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-651984355,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877,651984355,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk4NDM1NQ==,9599,simonw,2020-06-30T19:02:15Z,2020-06-30T19:02:15Z,OWNER,"https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html#login-csrf

> Login CSRF can be mitigated by creating pre-sessions (sessions before a user is authenticated) and including tokens in login form.

Sounds like regular CSRF protection to me.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",648421105,Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely?,