html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/8#issuecomment-618100658,https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/8,618100658,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxODEwMDY1OA==,9599,simonw,2020-04-23T00:03:35Z,2020-04-23T00:03:35Z,MEMBER,"Also MD5 isn't guaranteed for the ETag:
> If an object is created by either the Multipart Upload or Part Copy operation, the ETag is not an MD5 digest, regardless of the method of encryption.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",605147638,Should I have used MD5 instead of SHA256?,
https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/8#issuecomment-618100434,https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/8,618100434,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxODEwMDQzNA==,9599,simonw,2020-04-23T00:02:53Z,2020-04-23T00:02:53Z,MEMBER,"I don't think it matters one way or the other - I'm storing the sha256 in the filename, so the fact that I could read the MD5 back from the list bucket operation doesn't give me any benefits.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",605147638,Should I have used MD5 instead of SHA256?,