html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17#issuecomment-689226390,https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17,689226390,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4OTIyNjM5MA==,9599,simonw,2020-09-09T00:36:07Z,2020-09-09T00:36:07Z,MEMBER,"Alternative names:

- type
- record_type
- doctype

I think `type` is right. It matches what Elasticsearch used to call their equivalent of this (before they removed the feature!). https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/removal-of-types.html","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",694500679,"Rename ""table"" to ""type""",
https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17#issuecomment-687880459,https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17,687880459,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4Nzg4MDQ1OQ==,9599,simonw,2020-09-06T19:36:32Z,2020-09-06T19:36:32Z,MEMBER,At some point I may even want to support search types which are indexed from (and inflated from) more than one database file. I'm going to ignore that for the moment though.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",694500679,"Rename ""table"" to ""type""",