html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1202#issuecomment-766464136,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1202,766464136,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2NjQ2NDEzNg==,9599,simonw,2021-01-25T00:01:02Z,2021-01-25T00:01:02Z,OWNER,I'm going to use the existing `.. warning::` pattern for this.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",792931244,Documentation convention for marking unstable APIs.,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1202#issuecomment-766462475,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1202,766462475,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2NjQ2MjQ3NQ==,9599,simonw,2021-01-24T23:49:28Z,2021-01-24T23:50:33Z,OWNER,"Can use an ""admonition"" similar to this:
```sphinx
.. warning::
    Restricting access to tables and views in this way will NOT prevent users from querying them using arbitrary SQL queries, `like this <https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select+*+from+facetable>`__ for example.
```
As seen on https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/authentication.html#controlling-access-to-specific-tables-and-views

Documentation: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#specific-admonitions","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",792931244,Documentation convention for marking unstable APIs.,