html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240#issuecomment-786037219,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240,786037219,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjAzNzIxOQ==,9599,simonw,2021-02-25T16:39:23Z,2021-02-25T16:39:23Z,OWNER,"Example from the docs:
```pycon
>>> db = sqlite_utils.Database(memory=True)
>>> db[""dogs""].insert({""name"": ""Cleo""})
>>> for pk, row in db[""dogs""].pks_and_rows_where():
... print(pk, row)
1 {'rowid': 1, 'name': 'Cleo'}
>>> db[""dogs_with_pk""].insert({""id"": 5, ""name"": ""Cleo""}, pk=""id"")
>>> for pk, row in db[""dogs_with_pk""].pks_and_rows_where():
... print(pk, row)
5 {'id': 5, 'name': 'Cleo'}
>>> db[""dogs_with_compound_pk""].insert(
... {""species"": ""dog"", ""id"": 3, ""name"": ""Cleo""},
... pk=(""species"", ""id"")
... )
>>> for pk, row in db[""dogs_with_compound_pk""].pks_and_rows_where():
... print(pk, row)
('dog', 3) {'species': 'dog', 'id': 3, 'name': 'Cleo'}
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",816560819,table.pks_and_rows_where() method returning primary keys along with the rows,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240#issuecomment-786036355,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240,786036355,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjAzNjM1NQ==,9599,simonw,2021-02-25T16:38:07Z,2021-02-25T16:38:07Z,OWNER,Documentation: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/python-api.html#listing-rows-with-their-primary-keys,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",816560819,table.pks_and_rows_where() method returning primary keys along with the rows,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240#issuecomment-786016380,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240,786016380,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjAxNjM4MA==,9599,simonw,2021-02-25T16:10:01Z,2021-02-25T16:10:01Z,OWNER,"I prototyped this and I like it:
```
In [1]: import sqlite_utils
In [2]: db = sqlite_utils.Database(""/Users/simon/Dropbox/Development/datasette/fixtures.db"")
In [3]: list(db[""compound_primary_key""].pks_and_rows_where())
Out[3]: [(('a', 'b'), {'pk1': 'a', 'pk2': 'b', 'content': 'c'})]
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",816560819,table.pks_and_rows_where() method returning primary keys along with the rows,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240#issuecomment-786007209,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240,786007209,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjAwNzIwOQ==,9599,simonw,2021-02-25T15:57:50Z,2021-02-25T15:57:50Z,OWNER,`table.pks_and_rows_where(...)` is explicit and I think less ambiguous than the other options.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",816560819,table.pks_and_rows_where() method returning primary keys along with the rows,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240#issuecomment-786006794,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240,786006794,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjAwNjc5NA==,9599,simonw,2021-02-25T15:57:17Z,2021-02-25T15:57:28Z,OWNER,"I quite like `pks_with_rows_where(...)` - but grammatically it suggests it will return the primary keys that exist where their rows match the criteria - ""pks with rows"" can be interpreted as ""pks for the rows that..."" as opposed to ""pks accompanied by rows""","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",816560819,table.pks_and_rows_where() method returning primary keys along with the rows,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240#issuecomment-786005078,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240,786005078,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjAwNTA3OA==,9599,simonw,2021-02-25T15:54:59Z,2021-02-25T15:56:16Z,OWNER,"Is `pk_rows_where()` a good name? It sounds like it returns ""primary key rows"" which isn't a thing. It actually returns rows along with their primary key.
Other options:
- `table.rows_with_pk_where(...)` - should this return `(row, pk)` rather than `(pk, row)`?
- `table.rows_where_pk(...)`
- `table.pk_and_rows_where(...)`
- `table.pk_with_rows_where(...)`
- `table.pks_with_rows_where(...)` - because rows is pluralized, so pks should be pluralized too?
- `table.pks_rows_where(...)`","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",816560819,table.pks_and_rows_where() method returning primary keys along with the rows,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240#issuecomment-786001768,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240,786001768,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjAwMTc2OA==,9599,simonw,2021-02-25T15:50:28Z,2021-02-25T15:52:12Z,OWNER,"One option: `.rows_where()` could grow a `ensure_pk=True` option which checks to see if the table is a `rowid` table and, if it is, includes that in the `select`.
Or... how about you can call `.rows_where(..., pks=True)` and it will yield `(pk, rowdict)` tuple pairs instead of just returning the sequence of dictionaries?
I'm always a little bit nervous of methods that vary their return type based on their arguments. Maybe this would be a separate method instead?
```python
for pk, row in table.pk_rows_where(...):
# ...
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",816560819,table.pks_and_rows_where() method returning primary keys along with the rows,