html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008166084,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008166084,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F2TE,536941,fgregg,2022-01-08T22:32:47Z,2022-01-08T22:32:47Z,CONTRIBUTOR,or using “ pragma optimize”,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,create-index should run analyze after creating index,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008164786,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008164786,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F1-y,536941,fgregg,2022-01-08T22:24:19Z,2022-01-08T22:24:19Z,CONTRIBUTOR,the out-of-date scenario you describe could be addressed by automatically adding an analyze to the insert or convert commands if they implicate an index,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,create-index should run analyze after creating index,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008164116,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008164116,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F10U,536941,fgregg,2022-01-08T22:18:57Z,2022-01-08T22:18:57Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"the table with the query ran so bad was about 50k.
i think the scenario should not be worse than no stats.
i also did not know that sqlite was so different from postgres and needed an explicit analyze call.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,create-index should run analyze after creating index,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008161965,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1008161965,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F1St,536941,fgregg,2022-01-08T22:02:56Z,2022-01-08T22:02:56Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"for options 2 and 3, i would worry about discoverablity.
in other db’s it is not necessary to explicitly call analyze for most indices. ie for postgres
> The system regularly collects statistics on all of a table's columns. Newly-created non-expression indexes can immediately use these statistics to determine an index's usefulness.
i suppose i would propose raising a warning if the stats table is created that explains what is going on and informs users about a —no-analyze argument.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,create-index should run analyze after creating index,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1574#issuecomment-1007844190,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1574,1007844190,IC_kwDOBm6k_c48Ente,536941,fgregg,2022-01-08T00:42:12Z,2022-01-08T00:42:12Z,CONTRIBUTOR,is there a reason to not always use the slim option?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1084193403,introduce new option for datasette package to use a slim base image,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1007636709,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365,1007636709,IC_kwDOCGYnMM48D1Dl,536941,fgregg,2022-01-07T18:28:33Z,2022-01-07T18:29:43Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"i added an index to one table with sqlite-utils, and then a query that used to take about 1 second started taking hundreds of seconds.
running analyze got me back to sub second speed.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1096558279,create-index should run analyze after creating index,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1583#issuecomment-1002825217,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1583,1002825217,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47xeYB,536941,fgregg,2021-12-30T00:34:16Z,2021-12-30T00:34:16Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"if that is not desirable, it might be good to document that users might want to set up a lifecycle rule to automatically delete these build artifacts. something like https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59937542/can-i-delete-container-images-from-google-cloud-storage-artifacts-bucket","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1090810196,consider adding deletion step of cloudbuild artifacts to gcloud publish,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1561#issuecomment-997128712,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1561,997128712,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvoI,536941,fgregg,2021-12-18T02:35:48Z,2021-12-18T02:35:48Z,CONTRIBUTOR,interesting! i love this feature. this + full caching with cloudflare is really super!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1082765654,"add hash id to ""_memory"" url if hashed url mode is turned on and crossdb is also turned on",
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-993078038,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526,993078038,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47MSsW,536941,fgregg,2021-12-14T01:46:52Z,2021-12-14T01:46:52Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"the nested query idea is very nice, and i stole if for [my client side paginator](https://observablehq.com/d/1d5da3a3c3f2f347#DatasetteClient). However, it won't do the right thing if the original query orders by random().
If you go the nested query route, maybe raise a 4XX status code if the query has such a clause?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",459882902,Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1553#issuecomment-993014772,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1553,993014772,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47MDP0,536941,fgregg,2021-12-13T23:46:18Z,2021-12-13T23:46:18Z,CONTRIBUTOR,these headers would also be relevant for json exports of custom queries,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079111498,if csv export is truncated in non streaming mode set informative response header,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1553#issuecomment-992986587,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1553,992986587,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47L8Xb,536941,fgregg,2021-12-13T22:57:04Z,2021-12-13T22:57:04Z,CONTRIBUTOR,would also be good if the header said the what the max row limit was,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079111498,if csv export is truncated in non streaming mode set informative response header,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-992971072,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526,992971072,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47L4lA,536941,fgregg,2021-12-13T22:29:34Z,2021-12-13T22:29:34Z,CONTRIBUTOR,just came by to open this issue. would make my data analysis in observable a lot better!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",459882902,Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1549#issuecomment-991754237,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1549,991754237,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47HPf9,536941,fgregg,2021-12-11T19:14:39Z,2021-12-11T19:14:39Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"that option is not available on [custom queries](https://labordata.bunkum.us/odpr-962a140?sql=with+local_union_filings+as+%28%0D%0A++select+*+from+lm_data+%0D%0A++where%0D%0A++++yr_covered+%3E+cast%28strftime%28%27%25Y%27%2C+%27now%27%2C+%27-5+years%27%29+as+int%29%0D%0A++++and+desig_name+%3D+%27LU%27%0D%0A++order+by+yr_covered+desc%0D%0A%29%2C%0D%0Amost_recent_filing+as+%28%0D%0A++select%0D%0A++++*%0D%0A++from+local_union_filings%0D%0A++group+by%0D%0A++++f_num%0D%0A%29%0D%0Aselect%0D%0A++*%0D%0Afrom%0D%0A++most_recent_filing%0D%0Awhere%0D%0A++next_election+%3E%3D+strftime%28%27%25Y-%25m%27%2C+%27now%27%29%0D%0A++and+next_election+%3C+strftime%28%27%25Y-%25m%27%2C+%27now%27%2C+%27%2B1+year%27%29%0D%0Aorder+by%0D%0A++members+desc%3B).
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1077620955,Redesign CSV export to improve usability,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353#issuecomment-991405755,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353,991405755,IC_kwDOCGYnMM47F6a7,536941,fgregg,2021-12-11T01:38:29Z,2021-12-11T01:38:29Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"wow! that's awesome! thanks so much, @simonw!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1077102934,"Allow passing a file of code to ""sqlite-utils convert""",
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26#issuecomment-964205475,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26,964205475,IC_kwDOCGYnMM45eJuj,536941,fgregg,2021-11-09T14:31:29Z,2021-11-09T14:31:29Z,CONTRIBUTOR,i was just reaching for a tool to do this this morning,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",455486286,Mechanism for turning nested JSON into foreign keys / many-to-many,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1495#issuecomment-954384496,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1495,954384496,IC_kwDOBm6k_c444sBw,536941,fgregg,2021-10-29T03:07:13Z,2021-10-29T03:07:13Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"okay @simonw, made the requested changes. tests are running locally. i think this is ready for you to look at again.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1033678984,Allow routes to have extra options,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1284#issuecomment-949604763,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1284,949604763,IC_kwDOBm6k_c44mdGb,536941,fgregg,2021-10-22T12:54:34Z,2021-10-22T12:54:34Z,CONTRIBUTOR,i'm going to take a swing at this today. we'll see.,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",845794436,Feature or Documentation Request: Individual table as home page template,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1419#issuecomment-893114612,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1419,893114612,IC_kwDOBm6k_c41O9j0,536941,fgregg,2021-08-05T02:29:06Z,2021-08-05T02:29:06Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"there's a lot of complexity here, that's probably not worth addressing. i got what i needed by patching the dockerfile that cloudrun uses to install a newer version of sqlite.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",959710008,`publish cloudrun` should deploy a more recent SQLite version,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1419#issuecomment-892276385,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1419,892276385,IC_kwDOBm6k_c41Lw6h,536941,fgregg,2021-08-04T00:58:49Z,2021-08-04T00:58:49Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"yes, [filter clause on aggregate queries were added to sqlite3 in 3.30](https://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_30_1.html)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",959710008,`publish cloudrun` should deploy a more recent SQLite version,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1401#issuecomment-884910320,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1401,884910320,IC_kwDOBm6k_c40vqjw,536941,fgregg,2021-07-22T13:26:01Z,2021-07-22T13:26:01Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"ordered lists didn't work either, btw","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",950664971,unordered list is not rendering bullet points in description_html on database page,