html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092357672,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699,1092357672,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHA4o,25778,2022-04-08T01:39:40Z,2022-04-08T01:39:40Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> My best thought on how to differentiate them so far is plugins: if Datasette plugins that provide alternative outputs - like .geojson and .yml and suchlike - also work for the datasette query command that would make a lot of sense to me.

That's my thinking, too. It's really the thing I've been wanting since writing `datasette-geojson`, since I'm always exporting with `datasette --get`. The workflow I'm always looking for is something like this:

```sh
cd alltheplaces-datasette
datasette query dunkin_in_suffolk -f geojson -o dunkin_in_suffolk.geojson
```

I think this probably needs either a new plugin hook separate from `register_output_renderer` or a way to use that without going through the HTTP stack. Or maybe a render mode that writes to a stream instead of a response. Maybe there's a new key in the dictionary that `register_output_renderer` returns that handles CLI exports.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1193090967,