html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996084899,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552,996084899,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xwyj,9599,2021-12-16T18:48:14Z,2021-12-16T18:48:14Z,OWNER,Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/20a2ed6bec367d2f6759be4a879364a72780b59d/docs/facets.rst#facets-in-metadatajson,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1078702875,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996077053,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552,996077053,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xu39,9599,2021-12-16T18:36:41Z,2021-12-16T18:36:41Z,OWNER,"... actually no, I WILL document this, because not documenting this is what got us to this point in the first place!","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 1, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1078702875,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996076373,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552,996076373,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XutV,9599,2021-12-16T18:35:40Z,2021-12-16T18:35:40Z,OWNER,"I'm going to ship your fix now, but I'm not going to add this to the documentation yet because I hope to improve the design prior to Datasette 1.0.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1078702875,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996046304,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552,996046304,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XnXg,9599,2021-12-16T17:53:40Z,2021-12-16T18:16:12Z,OWNER,"I'm also not convinced that this configuration syntax is right. It's a bit weird having a `""facets""` list that can either by column-name-strings or `{""type-of-facet"": ""column-name""}` objects. Maybe there's a better design for this?

Part of the problem here is that facets were designed to accept optional extra configuration - partly to support `m2m` facets in #495 - but I haven't actually shipped any facets that use that ability.

Facet by delimiter would be a good one to exercise that ability:
- #510","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1078702875,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996045776,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552,996045776,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XnPQ,9599,2021-12-16T17:52:54Z,2021-12-16T17:52:54Z,OWNER,"I tried that fix you suggested and now this `metadata.json` does the right thing:
```json
{
    ""databases"": {
        ""fixtures"": {
            ""tables"": {
                ""facetable"": {
                    ""facets"": [
                        {
                            ""array"": ""tags""
                        }
                    ]
                }
            }
        }
    }
}
```
It does further highlight the bug in #625 though - since then if you try to add `?_facet=tags` to facet by tags treating them NOT as an array your request to do so is ignored.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1078702875,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996034408,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552,996034408,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xkdo,9599,2021-12-16T17:37:37Z,2021-12-16T17:37:37Z,OWNER,"I think you're right! I had completely forgotten that piece of code.

This just turned into a bug fix and a documentation update. Thanks for the research!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1078702875,