html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/288#issuecomment-483458569,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/288,483458569,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MzQ1ODU2OQ==,9599,2019-04-15T23:45:04Z,2019-04-15T23:45:04Z,OWNER,https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?tags__arraycontains=tag1&tags__arraycontains=tag2 now works.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",326767626,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/288#issuecomment-392288531,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/288,392288531,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MjI4ODUzMQ==,9599,2018-05-26T21:14:37Z,2019-04-15T23:01:17Z,OWNER,"This might also be an opportunity to support an __in= operator - though that's an odd one as it acts equivalent to an OR whereas every other parameter is combined with an AND

UPDATE 15th April 2019: I implemented `?column__in=` in a different way, see #433 ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",326767626,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/288#issuecomment-483106262,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/288,483106262,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MzEwNjI2Mg==,9599,2019-04-15T04:48:59Z,2019-04-15T04:48:59Z,OWNER,"This has got more urgent now that I've added the `?column__arraycontains=foo` filter as part of the effort to implement facet-by-array for #359

I added that filter in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/78e45ead4d771007c57b307edf8fc920101f8733 but it can only be applied once - for proper faceting this needs to work:

https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?tags__arraycontains=tag1&tags__arraycontains=tag2","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",326767626,