html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-652103895,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,652103895,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjEwMzg5NQ==,9599,2020-06-30T23:41:22Z,2020-06-30T23:41:22Z,OWNER,I don't think this needs any additional documentation - the new behaviour matches how the permissions are documented here: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/0.44/authentication.html#built-in-permissions,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651999516,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,651999516,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk5OTUxNg==,9599,2020-06-30T19:33:49Z,2020-06-30T21:34:59Z,OWNER,"Tests needed for this:

- If a user has view table but NOT view database / view instance, can they view the table page?
- If a user has view canned query but NOT view database / view instance, can they view the canned query page?
- If a user has view database but NOT view instance, can they view the database page?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651995453,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,651995453,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk5NTQ1Mw==,9599,2020-06-30T19:25:13Z,2020-06-30T19:25:26Z,OWNER,I'm going to put the new `check_permissions()` method on `BaseView` as well. If I want that method to be available to plugins I can do so by turning that `BaseView` class into a documented API that plugins are encouraged to use themselves.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651994978,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,651994978,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk5NDk3OA==,9599,2020-06-30T19:24:12Z,2020-06-30T19:24:12Z,OWNER,"Hah... but check_permission` is a method on `BaseView`. Here are the various permission methods at the moment:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/6c2634583627bfab750c115cb13850252821d637/datasette/default_permissions.py#L5-L14

And on BaseView:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/a8a5f813722f72703a7aae41135ccc40635cc02f/datasette/views/base.py#L65-L70","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651993977,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,651993977,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk5Mzk3Nw==,9599,2020-06-30T19:22:06Z,2020-06-30T19:22:06Z,OWNER,`permission_allowed` is already the name of the pugin hook. It's actually a bit confusing that it's also the name of a method on `datasette.`.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651993537,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,651993537,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk5MzUzNw==,9599,2020-06-30T19:21:15Z,2020-06-30T19:21:15Z,OWNER,"I could rename `permission_allowed()` to `check_permission()` and have a complementary `check_permissions()` method.

This is a breaking change but we're pre-1.0 so I think that's OK. I could even set up a temporary `permission_allowed()` alias which prints a deprecation warning to the console, then remove that at 1.0.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651992737,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,651992737,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTk5MjczNw==,9599,2020-06-30T19:19:33Z,2020-06-30T19:20:02Z,OWNER,"I already have this method on Datasette:
```python
async def permission_allowed(self, actor, action, resource=None, default=False):
```
What would be a good method name that complements that and indicates ""check a list of permissions in order""? Should it even run against the request or should you have to hand it `request.actor`?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-642907021,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,642907021,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MjkwNzAyMQ==,9599,2020-06-11T20:20:35Z,2020-06-11T20:20:35Z,OWNER,"I think the new `.check_permissions()` should be a documented utility that is available to plugins.
 Maybe a method on `datasette`?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-642906681,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,642906681,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MjkwNjY4MQ==,9599,2020-06-11T20:19:47Z,2020-06-11T20:20:02Z,OWNER,"So for the following:
```
await self.check_permissions(request, [
    (""view-table"", (database, table)),
    (""view-database"", database),
    ""view-instance"",
])
```
The logic is: if the first test returns `True`, you get access. If it returns `False` you are denied. If it says `None` then move on to the next check in the list and repeat.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-642795966,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,642795966,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Mjc5NTk2Ng==,9599,2020-06-11T16:37:21Z,2020-06-11T16:37:21Z,OWNER,"How would I document this? Probably in another section on https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/authentication.html#permissions

But I'd also need to add documentation to the individual views stating what permissions are checked and in what order. I could do that on this page: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pages.html","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-642741930,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,642741930,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Mjc0MTkzMA==,9599,2020-06-11T15:35:53Z,2020-06-11T15:36:05Z,OWNER,"May the fix here is to implement a `.check_permissions()` method which passes when the first permission passes?
```python
await self.check_permissions(request, [
    (""view-table"", (database, table)),
    (""view-database"", database),
    ""view-instance"",
])
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-642412017,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832,642412017,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MjQxMjAxNw==,9599,2020-06-11T05:13:59Z,2020-06-11T05:13:59Z,OWNER,"Relevant code:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ce4958018ede00fbdadf0c37a99889b6901bfb9b/datasette/views/table.py#L267-L272","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",636722501,