html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117#issuecomment-648442511,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117,648442511,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0ODQ0MjUxMQ==,9599,2020-06-23T21:39:41Z,2020-06-23T21:39:41Z,OWNER,"So there are two sides to supporting this:
- Being able to sensibly introspect composite foreign keys
- Being able to define composite foreign keys when creating a table","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",644161221,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117#issuecomment-648440634,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117,648440634,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0ODQ0MDYzNA==,9599,2020-06-23T21:35:16Z,2020-06-23T21:35:16Z,OWNER,Relevant discussion: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-generate/issues/8#issuecomment-648438056,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",644161221,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117#issuecomment-648440525,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117,648440525,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0ODQ0MDUyNQ==,9599,2020-06-23T21:35:01Z,2020-06-23T21:35:01Z,OWNER,"Here's what's missing:
```
In [11]: db.conn.execute('PRAGMA foreign_key_list(song)').fetchall()
Out[11]:
[(0,
0,
'album',
'songartist',
'albumartist',
'NO ACTION',
'NO ACTION',
'NONE'),
(0, 1, 'album', 'songalbum', 'albumname', 'NO ACTION', 'NO ACTION', 'NONE')]
```
Compare with this code here:
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/d0cdaaaf00249230e847be3a3b393ee2689fbfe4/sqlite_utils/db.py#L563-L579
The first two columns returned by `PRAGMA foreign_key_list(table)` are `id` and `seq` - these show when two foreign key records are part of the same compound foreign key. `sqlite-utils` entirely ignores those at the moment.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",644161221,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/116#issuecomment-648434885,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/116,648434885,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0ODQzNDg4NQ==,9599,2020-06-23T21:21:33Z,2020-06-23T21:21:33Z,OWNER,New docs: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/2.10.1/docs/python-api.rst#introspection,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",644122661,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/116#issuecomment-648403834,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/116,648403834,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0ODQwMzgzNA==,9599,2020-06-23T20:36:29Z,2020-06-23T20:36:29Z,OWNER,Should go in this section https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/stable/python-api.html#introspection - under `.columns_dict` and before `.foreign_keys`.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",644122661,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/859#issuecomment-648234787,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/859,648234787,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0ODIzNDc4Nw==,9599,2020-06-23T15:22:51Z,2020-06-23T15:22:51Z,OWNER,"I wonder if this is a SQLite caching issue then?
Datasette has a configuration option for this but I haven't spent much time experimenting with it so I don't know how much of an impact it can have: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/stable/config.html#cache-size-kb","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",642572841,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/859#issuecomment-648163272,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/859,648163272,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0ODE2MzI3Mg==,9599,2020-06-23T13:52:23Z,2020-06-23T13:52:23Z,OWNER,"I'm chunking inserts at 100 at a time right now: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/4d9a3204361d956440307a57bd18c829a15861db/sqlite_utils/db.py#L1030
I think the performance is more down to using Faker to create the test data - generating millions of entirely fake, randomized records takes a fair bit of time.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",642572841,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/859#issuecomment-647894903,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/859,647894903,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Nzg5NDkwMw==,9599,2020-06-23T04:07:59Z,2020-06-23T04:07:59Z,OWNER,"Just to check: are you seeing the problem on this page: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures (the database page) - or this page (the table page): https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys
If it's the table page then the problem may well be #862.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",642572841,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/596#issuecomment-647893140,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596,647893140,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Nzg5MzE0MA==,9599,2020-06-23T03:59:51Z,2020-06-23T03:59:51Z,OWNER,Related: #862 - a time limit on the total time spent considering suggested facets for a table.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",507454958,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/862#issuecomment-647892930,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/862,647892930,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Nzg5MjkzMA==,9599,2020-06-23T03:58:48Z,2020-06-23T03:58:48Z,OWNER,Should this be controlled be a separate configuration setting? I'm inclined to say no - I think instead I'll set the limit to be 10 * whatever `facet_suggest_time_limit_ms` is.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",643510821,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/859#issuecomment-647890619,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/859,647890619,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Nzg5MDYxOQ==,9599,2020-06-23T03:48:21Z,2020-06-23T03:48:21Z,OWNER," sqlite-generate many-cols.db --tables 2 --rows 200000 --columns 50
Looks like that will take 35 minutes to run (it's not a particularly fast tool).
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",642572841,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/859#issuecomment-647890378,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/859,647890378,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Nzg5MDM3OA==,9599,2020-06-23T03:47:19Z,2020-06-23T03:47:19Z,OWNER,"I generated a 600MB database using [sqlite-generate](https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-generate) just now - with 100 tables at 100,00 rows and 3 tables at 1,000,000 rows - and performance of the database page was fine, 250ms.
Those tables only had 4 columns each though.
You said ""200k+, 50+ rows in a couple of tables"" - does that mean 50+ columns? I'll try with larger numbers of columns and see what difference that makes.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",642572841,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/861#issuecomment-647889674,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/861,647889674,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Nzg4OTY3NA==,9599,2020-06-23T03:44:17Z,2020-06-23T03:44:17Z,OWNER,https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-generate is now ready to be used - see also https://pypi.org/project/sqlite-generate/,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",642652808,