html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1384#issuecomment-869074701,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1384,869074701,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg2OTA3NDcwMQ==,2670795,2021-06-26T23:45:18Z,2021-06-26T23:45:37Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> Here's where the plugin hook is called, demonstrating the `fallback=` argument:
> 
> https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/05a312caf3debb51aa1069939923a49e21cd2bd1/datasette/app.py#L426-L472
> 
> I'm not convinced of the use-case for passing `fallback=` to the hook here - is there a reason a plugin might care whether fallback is `True` or `False`, seeing as the `metadata()` method already respects that fallback logic on line 459?

I think you're right. I can't think of a reason why the plugin would care about the `fallback` parameter since plugins are currently mandated to return a full, global metadata dict.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",930807135,