html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-488564761,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427,488564761,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODU2NDc2MQ==,9599,2019-05-02T06:24:49Z,2019-05-03T00:07:16Z,OWNER,"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/facet-refactor-2 is almost ready to merge now. The remaining things to do are listed as TODOs there:

- [x] Ensure facet is not suggested if it is already active
- [x] Don't allow facets to be hidden if they were configured in metadata.json
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",431800286,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/432#issuecomment-488595724,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/432,488595724,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODU5NTcyNA==,45057,2019-05-02T08:50:53Z,2019-05-02T08:50:53Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> Can I pull those needs out of the Facet class somehow?

I was thinking that it might be handy for datasette to have a request object which wraps the Sanic Request. This could include the datasette-specific querystring decoding and the `special_args` parsing from TableView.data.

This would mean that we could expose the request object to plugin hooks without coupling them to Sanic.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",432893491,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-488564891,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427,488564891,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODU2NDg5MQ==,9599,2019-05-02T06:25:41Z,2019-05-02T06:25:41Z,OWNER,It would be neat to ship at least one additional face with this work - probably either `ArrayFacet` or `DateFacet`. I think `ArrayFacet` because it demonstrates the only-if-json1-enabled functionality.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",431800286,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/422#issuecomment-488558896,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/422,488558896,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODU1ODg5Ng==,9599,2019-05-02T05:43:11Z,2019-05-02T05:43:11Z,OWNER,"I'm doing this with time limits right now, which I think is good enough for the moment.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",423316403,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/438#issuecomment-488554835,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/438,488554835,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODU1NDgzNQ==,9599,2019-05-02T05:09:18Z,2019-05-02T05:09:18Z,OWNER,https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/example/simple.html#detect-if-running-from-within-a-pytest-run,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",438200529,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/419#issuecomment-488528111,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/419,488528111,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODUyODExMQ==,9599,2019-05-02T01:14:58Z,2019-05-02T01:14:58Z,OWNER,I just closed #420 - all of the places in the codebase that were using `.inspect()` should have been eliminated.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",421551434,