html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1302790013,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863,1302790013,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Npv99,9599,2022-11-03T23:32:30Z,2022-11-03T23:32:30Z,OWNER,"I'm not going to allow updates to primary keys. If you need to do that, you can instead delete the record and then insert a new one with the new primary keys you wanted - or maybe use a custom SQL query.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1425029242,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1302785086,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863,1302785086,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Npuw-,9599,2022-11-03T23:24:33Z,2022-11-03T23:24:56Z,OWNER,"Thinking more about validation: I'm considering if this should validate that columns which are defined as SQLite foreign keys are being updated to values that exist in those other tables.

I like the sound of this. It seems like a sensible default behaviour for Datasette. And it fits with the fact that Datasette treats foreign keys specially elsewhere in the interface.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1425029242,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1302760549,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863,1302760549,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Npoxl,9599,2022-11-03T22:43:04Z,2022-11-03T23:21:31Z,OWNER,"The `id=(int, ...)` thing is weird, but is apparently Pydantic syntax for a required field?

https://cs.github.com/starlite-api/starlite/blob/28ddc847c4cb072f0d5d21a9ecd5259711f12ec9/docs/usage/11-data-transfer-objects.md#L161 confirms:

> 1. For required fields use a tuple of type + ellipsis, for example `(str, ...)`.
> 2. For optional fields use a tuple of type + `None`, for example `(str, None)`
> 3. To set a default value use a tuple of type + default value, for example `(str, ""Hello World"")`","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1425029242,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1302760382,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863,1302760382,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Npou-,9599,2022-11-03T22:42:47Z,2022-11-03T22:42:47Z,OWNER,"```python
print(create_model('document', id=(int, ...), title=(str, None)).schema_json(indent=2))
```
```json
{
  ""title"": ""document"",
  ""type"": ""object"",
  ""properties"": {
    ""id"": {
      ""title"": ""Id"",
      ""type"": ""integer""
    },
    ""title"": {
      ""title"": ""Title"",
      ""type"": ""string""
    }
  },
  ""required"": [
    ""id""
  ]
}
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1425029242,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1302759174,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863,1302759174,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NpocG,9599,2022-11-03T22:40:47Z,2022-11-03T22:40:47Z,OWNER,"I'm considering Pydantic for this, see:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1302716350

In particular the `create_model()` method: https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/usage/models/#dynamic-model-creation

This would give me good validation. It would also, weirdly, give me the ability to output JSON schema. Maybe I could have this as the JSON schema for a row?

`/db/table/-/json-schema`","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1425029242,