html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636#issuecomment-1334759315,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636,1334759315,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Pjs-T,9599,2022-12-02T04:46:32Z,2022-12-02T04:46:32Z,OWNER,"Thankfully all of the logic for this already lives in just one place: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/d7e5e3c9f98d194fdfb12f1ecc60ed5b3afbc464/datasette/default_permissions.py#L23-L59","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1138008042, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636#issuecomment-1334758766,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636,1334758766,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Pjs1u,9599,2022-12-02T04:45:16Z,2022-12-02T04:45:16Z,OWNER,"Also, this is another thing which should live in `config.yml` rather than being crammed into `metadata.yml` - but I can fix that when I address: - #493","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1138008042, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636#issuecomment-1334757597,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636,1334757597,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Pjsjd,9599,2022-12-02T04:42:35Z,2022-12-02T04:42:35Z,OWNER,"Should I call this key `permissions` or something else? Some options: - `permissions` - `perms` - shorter to type - `allow` - I like the word, but might be confusing to change its meaning since we use it already","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1138008042, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636#issuecomment-1334673179,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636,1334673179,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5PjX8b,9599,2022-12-02T02:07:20Z,2022-12-02T04:27:07Z,OWNER,"So the new mechanism needs to extend that to handle all of the other permissions as well. The simplest design I can think of is this (here illustrated using YAML): ```yaml # instance-level permissions - give every logged in user the debug menu: permissions: debug-menu: id: * databases: content: # Allow bob to create-table in the content database permissions: create-table: id: bob ```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1138008042, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636#issuecomment-1334666806,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636,1334666806,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5PjWY2,9599,2022-12-02T01:58:40Z,2022-12-02T02:00:53Z,OWNER,"Current design: ```json { ""databases"": { ""private"": { ""allow"": { ""id"": ""*"" } } } } ``` This can be applied at the instance, database, table or query level within the nested JSON. https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/authentication.html#controlling-access-to-specific-databases It's actually controlling the following permissions: - `view-instance` - `view-database` - `view-table` - `view-query` There's also a special case for allowing SQL queries,at the instance and database level: ```json { ""databases"": { ""mydatabase"": { ""allow_sql"": { ""id"": ""root"" } } } } ```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1138008042,