html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-723365651,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197,723365651,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzM2NTY1MQ==,9599,simonw,2020-11-07T01:06:32Z,2020-11-07T01:06:32Z,OWNER,Documentation: https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/latest/python-api.html#searching-with-table-search,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",737153927,Rethink how table.search() method works,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-723360842,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197,723360842,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzM2MDg0Mg==,9599,simonw,2020-11-07T00:40:55Z,2020-11-07T00:40:55Z,OWNER,"The `order=` parameter should be called `order_by` for consistency with this:
```python
for row in db[""dogs""].rows_where(""age > 1"", order_by=""age""):
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",737153927,Rethink how table.search() method works,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-723230732,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197,723230732,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzIzMDczMg==,9599,simonw,2020-11-06T18:24:29Z,2020-11-06T18:24:29Z,OWNER,Still need to update docs.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",737153927,Rethink how table.search() method works,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-723148310,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197,723148310,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzE0ODMxMA==,9599,simonw,2020-11-06T15:42:43Z,2020-11-06T15:42:43Z,OWNER,Having `.search()` return tuples when `.rows_where()` returns dictionaries just feels like bad API design to me - it's inconsistent. ,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",737153927,Rethink how table.search() method works,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-722545442,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197,722545442,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMjU0NTQ0Mg==,9599,simonw,2020-11-05T18:05:33Z,2020-11-05T18:05:33Z,OWNER,This is likely to result in a 3.0 release due to a backwards-incompatible change to the current `.search()` method - #194,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",737153927,Rethink how table.search() method works,