html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/394#issuecomment-602904184,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/394,602904184,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwMjkwNDE4NA==,1448859,betatim,2020-03-23T23:03:42Z,2020-03-23T23:03:42Z,NONE,"On mybinder.org we allow access to arbitrary processes listening on a port inside the container via a [reverse proxy](https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy).

This means we need support for a proxy prefix as the proxy ends up running at a URL like `/something/random/proxy/datasette/...`

An example that shows the problem is https://github.com/psychemedia/jupyterserverproxy-datasette-demo. Launch directly into a datasette instance on mybinder.org with https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/psychemedia/jupyterserverproxy-datasette-demo/master?urlpath=datasette then try to follow links inside the UI.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",396212021,base_url configuration setting,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/97#issuecomment-614073859,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/97,614073859,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDA3Mzg1OQ==,1448859,betatim,2020-04-15T14:29:30Z,2020-04-15T14:29:30Z,NONE,"Woah! Thanks a lot. Next time I will add a more obvious/explicit ""if you like this idea let me know I'd love to work on it to get my feet wet here"" :D","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",593751293,"Adding a ""recreate"" flag to the `Database` constructor",
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/441#issuecomment-1155515426,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/441,1155515426,IC_kwDOCGYnMM5E38Qi,1448859,betatim,2022-06-14T17:53:43Z,2022-06-14T17:53:43Z,NONE,"That would be handy (additional where filters) but I think the trick with the `with` statement is already an order of magnitude better than what I had thought of, so my problem is solved by it (plus I got to learn about `with` today!)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1257724585,Combining `rows_where()` and `search()` to limit which rows are searched,