{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753587963", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983", "id": 753587963, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzU4Nzk2Mw==", "user": {"value": 154364, "label": "dracos"}, "created_at": "2021-01-03T09:02:50Z", "updated_at": "2021-01-03T10:00:05Z", "author_association": "NONE", "body": "> but I'm already commited to requiring support for () => {} arrow functions\r\n\r\nDon't think you are :) (e.g. gzipped, using arrow functions in my example saves 2 bytes over spelling out function). On FMS, past month, looking at popular browsers, looks like we'd have 95.41% arrow support, 94.19% module support, and 4.58% (mostly IE9/IE11/Safari 9) supporting neither.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 712260429, "label": "JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}