{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-593118471", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46", "id": 593118471, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MzExODQ3MQ==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-03-01T16:53:40Z", "updated_at": "2020-03-01T16:53:40Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "That seems sensible to me. Opening a ticket for it.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 471780443, "label": "extracts= option for insert/update/etc"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-592999503", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46", "id": 592999503, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5Mjk5OTUwMw==", "user": {"value": 35075, "label": "chrishas35"}, "created_at": "2020-02-29T22:08:20Z", "updated_at": "2020-02-29T22:08:20Z", "author_association": "NONE", "body": "@simonw any thoughts on allow extracts to specify the lookup column name? If I'm understanding the documentation right, `.lookup()` allows you to define the \"value\" column (the documentation uses name), but when you use `extracts` keyword as part of `.insert()`, `.upsert()` etc. the lookup must be done against a column named \"value\". I have an existing lookup table that I've populated with columns \"id\" and \"name\" as opposed to \"id\" and \"value\", and seems I can't use `extracts=`, unless I'm missing something...\r\n\r\nInitial thought on how to do this would be to allow the dictionary value to be a tuple of table name column pair... so:\r\n```\r\ntable = db.table(\"trees\", extracts={\"species_id\": (\"Species\", \"name\"})\r\n```\r\n\r\nI haven't dug too much into the existing code yet, but does this make sense? Worth doing?\r\n\r\n", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 471780443, "label": "extracts= option for insert/update/etc"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-514273140", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46", "id": 514273140, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNDI3MzE0MA==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2019-07-23T15:57:53Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-23T15:57:53Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "This will play very well with the new ability to specify these arguments in the class constructor, like so:\r\n\r\n```python\r\n    table = db.table(\"trees\", extracts={\"species_id\": \"Species\"})\r\n    table.insert_all([{\r\n        \"id\": 1,\r\n        \"species_id\": \"Oak\",\r\n    }, {\r\n        \"id\": 2,\r\n        \"species_id\": \"Oak\",\r\n    }, {\r\n        \"id\": 3,\r\n        \"species_id\": \"Palm\",\r\n    }])", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 471780443, "label": "extracts= option for insert/update/etc"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}