{"html_url": "https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17#issuecomment-689226390", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17", "id": 689226390, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4OTIyNjM5MA==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-09-09T00:36:07Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-09T00:36:07Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "body": "Alternative names:\r\n\r\n- type\r\n- record_type\r\n- doctype\r\n\r\nI think `type` is right. It matches what Elasticsearch used to call their equivalent of this (before they removed the feature!). https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/removal-of-types.html", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 694500679, "label": "Rename \"table\" to \"type\""}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17#issuecomment-687880459", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17", "id": 687880459, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4Nzg4MDQ1OQ==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-09-06T19:36:32Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-06T19:36:32Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "body": "At some point I may even want to support search types which are indexed from (and inflated from) more than one database file. I'm going to ignore that for the moment though.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 694500679, "label": "Rename \"table\" to \"type\""}, "performed_via_github_app": null}