{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008166084", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365", "id": 1008166084, "node_id": "IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F2TE", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2022-01-08T22:32:47Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-08T22:32:47Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "or using \u201c pragma optimize\u201d", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1096558279, "label": "create-index should run analyze after creating index"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008164786", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365", "id": 1008164786, "node_id": "IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F1-y", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2022-01-08T22:24:19Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-08T22:24:19Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "the out-of-date scenario you describe could be addressed by automatically adding an analyze to the insert or convert commands if they implicate an index", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1096558279, "label": "create-index should run analyze after creating index"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008164116", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365", "id": 1008164116, "node_id": "IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F10U", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2022-01-08T22:18:57Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-08T22:18:57Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "the table with the query ran so bad was about 50k. \r\n\r\ni think the scenario should not be worse than no stats. \r\n\r\ni also did not know that sqlite was so different from postgres and needed an explicit analyze call.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1096558279, "label": "create-index should run analyze after creating index"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1008161965", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365", "id": 1008161965, "node_id": "IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F1St", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2022-01-08T22:02:56Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-08T22:02:56Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "for options 2 and 3, i would worry about discoverablity. \r\n\r\nin other db\u2019s it is not necessary to explicitly call analyze for most indices. ie for postgres\r\n\r\n> The system regularly collects statistics on all of a table's columns. Newly-created non-expression indexes can immediately use these statistics to determine an index's usefulness.\r\n\r\ni suppose i would propose raising a warning if the stats table is created that explains what is going on and informs users about a \u2014no-analyze argument.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1096558279, "label": "create-index should run analyze after creating index"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1574#issuecomment-1007844190", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1574", "id": 1007844190, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c48Ente", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2022-01-08T00:42:12Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-08T00:42:12Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "is there a reason to not always use the slim option?", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1084193403, "label": "introduce new option for datasette package to use a slim base image"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365#issuecomment-1007636709", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/365", "id": 1007636709, "node_id": "IC_kwDOCGYnMM48D1Dl", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2022-01-07T18:28:33Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-07T18:29:43Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "i added an index to one table with sqlite-utils, and then a query that used to take about 1 second started taking hundreds of seconds. \r\n\r\nrunning analyze got me back to sub second speed.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1096558279, "label": "create-index should run analyze after creating index"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1583#issuecomment-1002825217", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1583", "id": 1002825217, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c47xeYB", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-12-30T00:34:16Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-30T00:34:16Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "if that is not desirable, it might be good to document that users might want to set up a lifecycle rule to automatically delete these build artifacts. something like https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59937542/can-i-delete-container-images-from-google-cloud-storage-artifacts-bucket", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1090810196, "label": "consider adding deletion step of cloudbuild artifacts to gcloud publish"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1561#issuecomment-997128712", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1561", "id": 997128712, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvoI", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-12-18T02:35:48Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-18T02:35:48Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "interesting! i love this feature. this + full caching with cloudflare is really super!", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1082765654, "label": "add hash id to \"_memory\" url if hashed url mode is turned on and crossdb is also turned on"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-993078038", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526", "id": 993078038, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c47MSsW", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-12-14T01:46:52Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-14T01:46:52Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "the nested query idea is very nice, and i stole if for [my client side paginator](https://observablehq.com/d/1d5da3a3c3f2f347#DatasetteClient). However,  it won't do the right thing if the original query orders by random().\r\n\r\nIf you go the nested query route, maybe raise a 4XX status code if the query has such a clause?", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 459882902, "label": "Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1553#issuecomment-993014772", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1553", "id": 993014772, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c47MDP0", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-12-13T23:46:18Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-13T23:46:18Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "these headers would also be relevant for json exports of custom queries", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1079111498, "label": "if csv export is truncated in non streaming mode set informative response header"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1553#issuecomment-992986587", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1553", "id": 992986587, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c47L8Xb", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-12-13T22:57:04Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-13T22:57:04Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "would also be good if the header said the what the max row limit was", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1079111498, "label": "if csv export is truncated in non streaming mode set informative response header"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-992971072", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526", "id": 992971072, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c47L4lA", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-12-13T22:29:34Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-13T22:29:34Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "just came by to open this issue. would make my data analysis in observable a lot better!", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 459882902, "label": "Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1549#issuecomment-991754237", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1549", "id": 991754237, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c47HPf9", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-12-11T19:14:39Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-11T19:14:39Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "that option is not available on [custom queries](https://labordata.bunkum.us/odpr-962a140?sql=with+local_union_filings+as+%28%0D%0A++select+*+from+lm_data+%0D%0A++where%0D%0A++++yr_covered+%3E+cast%28strftime%28%27%25Y%27%2C+%27now%27%2C+%27-5+years%27%29+as+int%29%0D%0A++++and+desig_name+%3D+%27LU%27%0D%0A++order+by+yr_covered+desc%0D%0A%29%2C%0D%0Amost_recent_filing+as+%28%0D%0A++select%0D%0A++++*%0D%0A++from+local_union_filings%0D%0A++group+by%0D%0A++++f_num%0D%0A%29%0D%0Aselect%0D%0A++*%0D%0Afrom%0D%0A++most_recent_filing%0D%0Awhere%0D%0A++next_election+%3E%3D+strftime%28%27%25Y-%25m%27%2C+%27now%27%29%0D%0A++and+next_election+%3C+strftime%28%27%25Y-%25m%27%2C+%27now%27%2C+%27%2B1+year%27%29%0D%0Aorder+by%0D%0A++members+desc%3B).\r\n\r\n", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1077620955, "label": "Redesign CSV export to improve usability"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353#issuecomment-991405755", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353", "id": 991405755, "node_id": "IC_kwDOCGYnMM47F6a7", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-12-11T01:38:29Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-11T01:38:29Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "wow! that's awesome! thanks so much, @simonw!", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1077102934, "label": "Allow passing a file of code to \"sqlite-utils convert\""}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26#issuecomment-964205475", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26", "id": 964205475, "node_id": "IC_kwDOCGYnMM45eJuj", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-11-09T14:31:29Z", "updated_at": "2021-11-09T14:31:29Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "i was just reaching for a tool to do this this morning", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 455486286, "label": "Mechanism for turning nested JSON into foreign keys / many-to-many"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1495#issuecomment-954384496", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1495", "id": 954384496, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c444sBw", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-10-29T03:07:13Z", "updated_at": "2021-10-29T03:07:13Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "okay @simonw, made the requested changes. tests are running locally. i think this is ready for you to look at again.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 1033678984, "label": "Allow routes to have extra options"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1284#issuecomment-949604763", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1284", "id": 949604763, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c44mdGb", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-10-22T12:54:34Z", "updated_at": "2021-10-22T12:54:34Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "i'm going to take a swing at this today. we'll see.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 845794436, "label": "Feature or Documentation Request: Individual table as home page template"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1419#issuecomment-893114612", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1419", "id": 893114612, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c41O9j0", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-08-05T02:29:06Z", "updated_at": "2021-08-05T02:29:06Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "there's a lot of complexity here, that's probably not worth addressing. i got what i needed by patching the dockerfile that cloudrun uses to install a newer version of sqlite.\r\n\r\n", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 959710008, "label": "`publish cloudrun` should deploy a more recent SQLite version"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1419#issuecomment-892276385", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1419", "id": 892276385, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c41Lw6h", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-08-04T00:58:49Z", "updated_at": "2021-08-04T00:58:49Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "yes, [filter clause on aggregate queries were added to sqlite3 in 3.30](https://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_30_1.html)", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 959710008, "label": "`publish cloudrun` should deploy a more recent SQLite version"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1401#issuecomment-884910320", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1401", "id": 884910320, "node_id": "IC_kwDOBm6k_c40vqjw", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "created_at": "2021-07-22T13:26:01Z", "updated_at": "2021-07-22T13:26:01Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "ordered lists didn't work either, btw", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 950664971, "label": "unordered list is not rendering bullet points in description_html on database page"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}