{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/268#issuecomment-876721585", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/268", "id": 876721585, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3NjcyMTU4NQ==", "user": {"value": 9308268, "label": "rayvoelker"}, "created_at": "2021-07-08T20:22:17Z", "updated_at": "2021-07-08T20:22:17Z", "author_association": "NONE", "body": "I do like the idea of there being a option for turning that on by default so that you could use those terms in the default \"Search\" bar presented when you browse to a table where FTS has been enabled. Maybe even a small inline pop up with a short bit explaining the FTS feature and the keywords (e.g. case matters). What are the side-effects of turning that on in the query string, or even by default as you suggested? I see that you stated in the docs... \"to ensure they do not cause any confusion for users who are not aware of them\", but I'm not sure what those could be.\r\n\r\nIsn't it the case that those keywords are only picked up by sqlite in where you're using the MATCH clause?\r\n\r\nSeems like a really powerful feature (even though there are a lot of hurdles around setting it up in the sqlite db ... sqlite-utils makes that so simple by the way!)", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 323718842, "label": "Mechanism for ranking results from SQLite full-text search"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/268#issuecomment-876428348", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/268", "id": 876428348, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3NjQyODM0OA==", "user": {"value": 9308268, "label": "rayvoelker"}, "created_at": "2021-07-08T13:13:12Z", "updated_at": "2021-07-08T13:13:12Z", "author_association": "NONE", "body": "I had setup a full text search on my instance of Datasette for title data for our public library, and was noticing that some of the features of the SQLite FTS weren't working as expected ... and maybe the issue is in the `escape_fts()` function\r\n\r\n\r\nvs removing the function...\r\n\r\n\r\nAlso, on the issue of sorting by rank by default .. perhaps something like this could work for the baked-in default SQL query for Datasette?\r\n\r\n\r\n[link to the above search in my instance of Datasette](https://ilsweb.cincinnatilibrary.org/collection-analysis/current_collection-87a9011?sql=with+fts_search+as+%28%0D%0A++select%0D%0A++rowid%2C%0D%0A++rank%0D%0A++++from%0D%0A++++++bib_fts%0D%0A++++where%0D%0A++++++bib_fts+match+%3Asearch%0D%0A%29%0D%0A%0D%0Aselect%0D%0A++%0D%0A++bib_record_num%2C%0D%0A++creation_date%2C%0D%0A++record_last_updated%2C%0D%0A++isbn%2C%0D%0A++best_author%2C%0D%0A++best_title%2C%0D%0A++publisher%2C%0D%0A++publish_year%2C%0D%0A++bib_level_callnumber%2C%0D%0A++indexed_subjects%0D%0Afrom%0D%0A++fts_search%0D%0A++join+bib+on+bib.rowid+%3D+fts_search.rowid%0D%0A++%0D%0Aorder+by%0D%0Arank%0D%0A&search=black+death+NOT+fiction)", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 323718842, "label": "Mechanism for ranking results from SQLite full-text search"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}