{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-723365651", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197", "id": 723365651, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzM2NTY1MQ==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-11-07T01:06:32Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-07T01:06:32Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "Documentation: https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/latest/python-api.html#searching-with-table-search", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 737153927, "label": "Rethink how table.search() method works"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-723360842", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197", "id": 723360842, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzM2MDg0Mg==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-11-07T00:40:55Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-07T00:40:55Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "The `order=` parameter should be called `order_by` for consistency with this:\r\n```python\r\nfor row in db[\"dogs\"].rows_where(\"age > 1\", order_by=\"age\"):\r\n```", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 737153927, "label": "Rethink how table.search() method works"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-723230732", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197", "id": 723230732, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzIzMDczMg==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-11-06T18:24:29Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-06T18:24:29Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "Still need to update docs.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 737153927, "label": "Rethink how table.search() method works"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-723148310", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197", "id": 723148310, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzE0ODMxMA==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-11-06T15:42:43Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-06T15:42:43Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "Having `.search()` return tuples when `.rows_where()` returns dictionaries just feels like bad API design to me - it's inconsistent. ", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 737153927, "label": "Rethink how table.search() method works"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197#issuecomment-722545442", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197", "id": 722545442, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMjU0NTQ0Mg==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-11-05T18:05:33Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-05T18:05:33Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "This is likely to result in a 3.0 release due to a backwards-incompatible change to the current `.search()` method - #194", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 737153927, "label": "Rethink how table.search() method works"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}