issue_comments: 1105642187
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1101#issuecomment-1105642187 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1101 | 1105642187 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5B5sLL | 25778 | 2022-04-21T18:59:08Z | 2022-04-21T18:59:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ha! That was your idea (and a good one). But it's probably worth measuring to see what overhead it adds. It did require both passing in the database and making the whole thing Just timing the queries themselves:
Looking at the network panel:
I'm not sure how best to time the GeoJSON generation, but it would be interesting to check. Maybe I'll write a plugin to add query times to response headers. The other thing to consider with async streaming is that it might be well-suited for a slower response. When I have to get the whole result and send a response in a fixed amount of time, I need the most efficient query possible. If I can hang onto a connection and get things one chunk at a time, maybe it's ok if there's some overhead. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
749283032 |