issue_comments: 1336099368
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1927#issuecomment-1336099368 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927 | 1336099368 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Po0Io | 9599 | 2022-12-03T06:56:36Z | 2022-12-03T06:56:36Z | OWNER | Neither of these options make sense if you didn't pass a My initial implementation spotted if the So maybe this work should expanded to include validation that checks if the table exists already - and if it does, confirms that the primary key (and maybe even the columns) are the same as for that existing table. Of course if you only send |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1473411197 |