issue_comments: 1460943097

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1999#issuecomment-1460943097 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1999 1460943097 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5XFDj5 9599 2023-03-08T22:09:24Z 2023-03-08T22:09:47Z OWNER

The ease with which I added that ?_extra=query feature in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1999/commits/96e94f9b7b2db53865e61390bcce6761727f26d8 made me feel really confident that this architecture is going in the right direction.

```diff diff --git a/datasette/views/table.py b/datasette/views/table.py index 8d3bb2c930..3e1db9c85f 100644 --- a/datasette/views/table.py +++ b/datasette/views/table.py @@ -1913,6 +1913,13 @@ async def extra_request(): "args": request.args._data, }

  • async def extra_query():
  • "Details of the underlying SQL query"
  • return {
  • "sql": sql,
  • "params": params,
  • } + async def extra_extras(): "Available ?_extra= blocks" return { @@ -1938,6 +1945,7 @@ async def extra_extras(): extra_primary_keys, extra_debug, extra_request,
  • extra_query, extra_extras, ) ```
 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 1551694938