issue_comments: 1613887492
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2093#issuecomment-1613887492 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2093 | 1613887492 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5gMfgE | 9599 | 2023-06-29T22:40:25Z | 2023-06-29T22:40:25Z | OWNER | I'm strongly in favour of combining settings, configuration and plugin configuration. I'm not keen on mixing in metadata as well - that feels like a different concept to me, and I'm unhappy with how that's already had things like plugin settings leak into it. I'm not yet sold on TOML - I actually find it less intuitive than YAML, surprisingly. They all have their warts I guess. Datasette already has the ability to consume JSON or YAML for metadata - maybe it could grow TOML support too? That way users could have a In terms of metadata: since that's means to be driven by a plugin hook anyway, maybe one of the potential sources of metadata is a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1781530343 |