issue_comments: 1684488526
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2143#issuecomment-1684488526 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2143 | 1684488526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5kZ0FO | 9599 | 2023-08-18T22:18:39Z | 2023-08-18T22:18:39Z | OWNER |
I'm not a fan of that. I feel like software history is full of examples of projects that implemented configuration-as-code and then later regretted it - the most recent example is I don't think having people dynamically generate JSON/YAML for their configuration is a big burden. I'd have to see some very compelling use-cases to convince me otherwise. That said, I do really like a bias towards settings that can be changed at runtime. Datasette has suffered a bit from some settings that can't be easily changed at runtime already - hence my gnarly https://github.com/simonw/datasette-remote-metadata plugin. For things like Datasette Cloud for example the more people can configure without rebooting their container the better! I don't think live reconfiguration at runtime is incompatible with JSON/YAML configuration though. Caddy is one of my favourite examples of software that can be entirely re-configured at runtime by POSTING a big blob of JSON to it: https://caddyserver.com/docs/quick-starts/api |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1855885427 |