issue_comments: 1696709110

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2162#issuecomment-1696709110 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2162 1696709110 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5lIbn2 9599 2023-08-29T03:20:40Z 2023-08-29T03:22:47Z OWNER

However, one important notes about those new core_ tables: If a --internal DB is passed in, that means those core_ tables will persist across multiple Datasette instances. This wasn't the case before, since _internal was always an in-memory database created from scratch.

I'm completely happy for the core_* tables (or datasette_* or some other name) to live in the persisted-to-disk internal.db database, even though they're effectively meant to be an in-memory cache.

I don't think it causes any harm, and it could even be quite useful to have them visible on disk - other applications could read the internal.db database while Datasette itself is running, should they have some weird reason to want to do that!

Having those tables stick around in internal.db after Datasette shuts down could be useful for other debugging activities as well.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 1870672704