issue_comments: 495059236

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/355#issuecomment-495059236 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/355 495059236 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NTA1OTIzNg== 9599 2019-05-23T04:03:04Z 2019-05-23T04:03:04Z OWNER

This assumes that our current table has a single, unambiguous foreign key relationship with the table indicated by the ?through= parameter.

I think that's reasonable. The JSON format could be extended to allow that side of the relationship to optionally be defined there (if the foreign key relationship is missing).

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 346027040