issue_comments: 497194179

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/495#issuecomment-497194179 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/495 497194179 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NzE5NDE3OQ== 9599 2019-05-30T04:04:01Z 2019-05-30T04:04:01Z OWNER

I think there are a few steps to solving this:

  • Define a variant of ?_facet_m2m={..} that takes a JSON object which specifies which middle and destination table should be used, and via which columns
  • Teach the Facet ManyToManyFacet.suggest() method to check for multiple conflicting m2m relationships and use the new JSON URL for them. Also pick non-conflicting display names for those facets.
 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 450032134