issue_comments: 541837823
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/578#issuecomment-541837823 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/578 | 541837823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MTgzNzgyMw== | 887095 | 2019-10-14T18:19:42Z | 2019-10-14T18:19:42Z | NONE | My use case was: I wanted to use datasette on a Raspberry Pi. You are right, the build method is quite new and I would not be surprised if the syntax / command will change in future. The outcome however, a Docker multi-architecture manifest, is aligned with Docker's strategy on how to tackle multiple architectures: transparently, on the registry-side. I just thought it would be nice to have the official image ready for multiple architectures. But I fully understand if the current methods feel too experimental to be mergable... |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
499954048 |