issue_comments: 733175454

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/860#issuecomment-733175454 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/860 733175454 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMzE3NTQ1NA== 9599 2020-11-24T19:06:07Z 2020-11-24T19:06:07Z OWNER

I see two ways this plugin hook could work. It could be asked about a specific instance, database or table and return the full metadata for that object. OR it could ask for a specific metadata field - e.g. source_url for table X, and return that.

The more finely grained one would allow plugins to implement their own cascading rules pretty easily. Is there a reason it would be better for the hook to return an entire block of JSON for a specific table or database?

I also need to decide if this hook is just going to be about source/license/about displayed metadata, or if it will include the functionality that has been sneaking into metadata.json over time - stuff like page size, default sort order or default facets.

Perhaps I should split those out into a "configuration" concept first, after renaming --config to --setting in #992.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 642651572