issue_comments: 747734273
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/461#issuecomment-747734273 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/461 | 747734273 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NzczNDI3Mw== | 9599 | 2020-12-17T22:14:46Z | 2020-12-17T22:14:46Z | OWNER | I've been thinking about this a bunch. For Datasette to be useful as a private repository of data (Datasette Library, #417) it's crucial that it can handle a much, much larger number of databases. This makes me worry about how many connections (and open file handles) it makes sense to have open at one time. I realize now that this is much less of a problem for private instances. Public instances on the internet could get traffic to any database at any time, so connections could easily get out of control. A private instance with only a few users could instead get away with only opening connections to databases in "active use". This does however make it even more important for Datasette to maintain a cached set of metadata about the tables - which is also needed to power this feature. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
443021509 |