home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 754210356

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-754210356 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 754210356 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NDIxMDM1Ng== 222245 2021-01-04T20:49:05Z 2021-01-04T20:49:05Z NONE

For reasons I've written about elsewhere, I'm in favor of modules. It has several beneficial effects. One, old browsers just ignore it all together. Two, if you include the same plain script on the page more than once, it will be executed twice, but if you include the same module script on a page twice, it will only execute once. Three, you get a module local namespace, instead of having to use the global window namespace or a function private namespace.

OTOH, if you are going to use an old style script, the code from before isn't ideal, because you wipe out your registry if the script it included more than once. Also you may as well use object methods and splat arguments.

The event based architecture probably makes more sense though. Just make up some event names prefixed with datasette: and listen for them on the root. The only concern with that approach is it can sometimes be tricky to make sure your plugins are run after datasette has run. Maybe

```js function mycallback(){ // whatever }

if (window.datasette) { window.datasette.init(mycallback); } else { document.addEventListener('datasette:init', mycallback); } ```

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
712260429  
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.164ms · About: github-to-sqlite