home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 761179229

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/657#issuecomment-761179229 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/657 761179229 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MTE3OTIyOQ== 9599 2021-01-15T20:24:35Z 2021-01-15T20:24:35Z OWNER

I'm not sure how I missed this issue but it's almost a year later and I'm finally taking a look at your Parquet work.

This is yet more evidence that allowing plugins to provide their own custom Database objects would be a good idea.

I started exploring what Datasette would like on PostgreSQL in #670 - my concern was that I would need to add a large amount of database abstraction code which would dramatically increase the complexity of the core project, but my thinking now is that it might be tractable - Datasette doesn't actually construct SQL in complex ways anywhere outside of the TableView class so abstracting away just that bit should be feasible.

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
548591089  
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.837ms · About: github-to-sqlite