issue_comments: 801816980
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/246#issuecomment-801816980 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/246 | 801816980 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMTgxNjk4MA== | 37962604 | 2021-03-18T10:40:32Z | 2021-03-18T10:43:04Z | NONE | I have found a similar problem, but I only when using that type of query (with
I thought I could build a query like the first one using this function:
And then I use the output of that function as the query parameter for the standard However, my use case is different because I'm the one "deciding" when to use a prefix search, not the end user. I also haven't done many tests, but maybe you found that useful. One thing I could think of is checking if the query has an This is just for prefix queries, I think having the escaping function is still useful for other use cases. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
831751367 |