issue_comments: 851115805
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1345#issuecomment-851115805 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1345 | 851115805 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg1MTExNTgwNQ== | 9599 | 2021-05-31T01:59:39Z | 2021-05-31T01:59:39Z | OWNER | Maybe there's a concept here of the columns that are required by a selected facet? Those can then be included as I can also use them to provide a better error message than "no such column: state" - I can verify that There is one other option here: I could still include the columns that are known to be needed for faceting in the faceting SQL queries, but leave them out of the query that is used to return the results! That's actually a pretty tempting (albeit more complex) option. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
904071938 |